Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Five (orchestras): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MUSIKVEREIN (talk | contribs) Big Five (orchestras) - Proposed deletion |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I have nominated this article for deletions for the following reasons: It is lacking inline citations; Portions of the article, notably the Modern Use section, appear to be original research; The article has been tagged with requests for citation for several months with no action taken.[[User:THD3|THD3]] ([[User talk:THD3|talk]]) 12:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC) |
I have nominated this article for deletions for the following reasons: It is lacking inline citations; Portions of the article, notably the Modern Use section, appear to be original research; The article has been tagged with requests for citation for several months with no action taken.[[User:THD3|THD3]] ([[User talk:THD3|talk]]) 12:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
I agree with THD3. In addition to his reasons, this has really become an outdated concept. [[User:MUSIKVEREIN|MUSIKVEREIN]] ([[User talk:MUSIKVEREIN|talk]]) 13:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC). |
|||
Revision as of 13:36, 16 July 2010
- Big Five (orchestras) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacking proper citaions, speculative
I have nominated this article for deletions for the following reasons: It is lacking inline citations; Portions of the article, notably the Modern Use section, appear to be original research; The article has been tagged with requests for citation for several months with no action taken.THD3 (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree with THD3. In addition to his reasons, this has really become an outdated concept. MUSIKVEREIN (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC).