Fair Share Health Care Act: Difference between revisions
Bsmithpoop (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Empty Buffer (talk | contribs) m Reverted 1 edit by Bsmithpoop identified as vandalism to last revision by Quackslikeaduck. (TW) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Healthcare in the United States}} |
{{Healthcare in the United States}} |
||
[[Maryland Senate]] Bill 790, known as the '''Fair Share Health Care Act''', also nicknamed the ''"Wal-Mart Bill"'', was a legislative act passed in the state of [[Maryland]] in 2005. The act would have required for-profit employers with more than |
[[Maryland Senate]] Bill 790, known as the '''Fair Share Health Care Act''', also nicknamed the ''"Wal-Mart Bill"'', was a legislative act passed in the state of [[Maryland]] in 2005. The act would have required for-profit employers with more than 10,000 workers in the state of Maryland to spend at least 8% of their payroll on employee health benefits or make a contribution to the state's insurance program for the poor. Non-profit employers were required to do the same, but with a lower, 6% benchmark. |
||
The Maryland legislature initially passed the bill on April 5, 2005.<ref>{{cite news |title=Md. Passes Rules on Wal-Mart Insurance |work=The Washington Post |date=April 6, 2005 |page=A01 |last= Wagner |first=John; Barbaro, Michael |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28219-2005Apr5.html }}</ref> Though its supporters contended that it did not single out [[Wal-Mart]], Wal-Mart was the only private, for-profit employer in the state that would have been affected. |
The Maryland legislature initially passed the bill on April 5, 2005.<ref>{{cite news |title=Md. Passes Rules on Wal-Mart Insurance |work=The Washington Post |date=April 6, 2005 |page=A01 |last= Wagner |first=John; Barbaro, Michael |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28219-2005Apr5.html }}</ref> Though its supporters contended that it did not single out [[Wal-Mart]], Wal-Mart was the only private, for-profit employer in the state that would have been affected. |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
In 2006, such a bill was vetoed by the governor of [[Colorado]].<ref>[http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/government/article/0,2777,DRMN_23906_4748013,00.html]{{dl|date=April 2010}}</ref> |
In 2006, such a bill was vetoed by the governor of [[Colorado]].<ref>[http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/government/article/0,2777,DRMN_23906_4748013,00.html]{{dl|date=April 2010}}</ref> |
||
In the same year, a version of the bill that would have required companies with |
In the same year, a version of the bill that would have required companies with 5,000 or more employees to spend 9% of their payroll on health care benefits was defeated<ref>{{cite news |title= |
||
Wal-Mart bill likely dead; unions upset with Chopp |work=Seattle Times |date=February 15, 2006 |first=Ralph |last=Thomas |url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002806194_walmart15m.html }}</ref> |
Wal-Mart bill likely dead; unions upset with Chopp |work=Seattle Times |date=February 15, 2006 |first=Ralph |last=Thomas |url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002806194_walmart15m.html }}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 21:50, 19 July 2010
| Healthcare in the United States |
|---|
Maryland Senate Bill 790, known as the Fair Share Health Care Act, also nicknamed the "Wal-Mart Bill", was a legislative act passed in the state of Maryland in 2005. The act would have required for-profit employers with more than 10,000 workers in the state of Maryland to spend at least 8% of their payroll on employee health benefits or make a contribution to the state's insurance program for the poor. Non-profit employers were required to do the same, but with a lower, 6% benchmark.
The Maryland legislature initially passed the bill on April 5, 2005.[1] Though its supporters contended that it did not single out Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart was the only private, for-profit employer in the state that would have been affected.
The bill was vetoed by then-Governor Robert L. Ehrlich[2] On January 12, 2006, the Senate decided to override Ehrlich's veto, thereby passing the act into law.[3][4]
On July 18, 2006, a federal judge struck down the law as preempted by ERISA. On January 17, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the decision.[5]
Similar measures
While the Maryland bill drew the most national media attention, similar measures were considered in other states but also failed.
In 2006, such a bill was vetoed by the governor of Colorado.[6]
In the same year, a version of the bill that would have required companies with 5,000 or more employees to spend 9% of their payroll on health care benefits was defeated[7]
External links
- Details of the Fair Share Health Care Act. Maryland General Assembly.
References
- ^ Wagner, John; Barbaro, Michael (April 6, 2005). "Md. Passes Rules on Wal-Mart Insurance". The Washington Post. p. A01.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Armour, Stephanie (January 13, 2006). "Maryland first to OK 'Wal-Mart bill'". USA Today.
- ^ Wagner, John (January 13, 2006). "Md. Legislature Overrides Veto on Wal-Mart Bill". The Washington Post.
- ^ Coulter, Michael (March 2006). "Md. Enacts 'Wal-Mart' Bill". The Heartland Institute.
- ^ Barbaro, Michael (January 18, 2007). "Appeals Court Rules for Wal-Mart in Maryland Health Care Case". New York Times.
- ^ [1][dead link]
- ^ Thomas, Ralph (February 15, 2006). "Wal-Mart bill likely dead; unions upset with Chopp". Seattle Times.
 | This Maryland-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |