Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IGot a Hot Room: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tartar789 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Television
Line 19: Line 19:


*''' Delete''' Not neccecary athe episode is just a regular one. I vote Delete.[[User:Tartar789|Tartar789]] ([[User talk:Tartar789|talk]]) 17:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
*''' Delete''' Not neccecary athe episode is just a regular one. I vote Delete.[[User:Tartar789|Tartar789]] ([[User talk:Tartar789|talk]]) 17:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television|list of Television-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:29, 3 August 2010 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 17:29, 3 August 2010

IGot a Hot Room (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maybe I'm not looking in the right places, but I do not see why this episode is so special it deserves it's own article. Does not establish notability, so fails WP:N. If I'm wrong, and this is notable, I'll happily withdraw this. — dαlus Contribs 06:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to note that the single source doesn't even appear to be reliable, and more of a 'gossip' site.— dαlus Contribs 06:59, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]