Talk:Vexnews: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Please indent and sign your comments. |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::::Please indent and sign your comments. wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 23:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
::::Please indent and sign your comments. wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 23:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::::Straight up ad that tries to cover its political bias. Either needs to be removed or re-worked in its entirety.[[Special:Contributions/121.208.114.70|121.208.114.70]] ([[User talk:121.208.114.70|talk]]) 06:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:56, 13 November 2010
Neutrality
To me, it looks like this article is coming off as more of an advertisement for the website, rather than encyclopedic information. Maybe try to have someone more removed from the website rewrite the article? --Warbirdadmiral (talk) 05:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Clearly an advertisement.Sfcardwell (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- If anything, there's probably too much criticism in the article, should be more balanced. Gerrydavidson (talk) 07:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have to agree. This page lacks neutrality. Equally worrying is the fact that the references cited often don't appear to back up what is claimed in the text.
- Serious consideration needs to be given to the deletion of this page. Attempts to enhance it are immediately undone by someone who appears to have a vested interest in maintaining the site in the way he or she originally wrote it. Obscure and strange threats are also made to those who try to improve the site. This is not in the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia. The page is a blight on Wikipedia and needs to be removed.
- Please indent and sign your comments. wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 23:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Straight up ad that tries to cover its political bias. Either needs to be removed or re-worked in its entirety.121.208.114.70 (talk) 06:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)