User talk:Willmcw~enwiki: Difference between revisions
Mel Etitis (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
A blast from the past. A Protest Warrior member is trying to rewrite the article to suit his personal view of the organisation. Any chance that you could take a look at it and see what you think? --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]] ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 14:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC) |
A blast from the past. A Protest Warrior member is trying to rewrite the article to suit his personal view of the organisation. Any chance that you could take a look at it and see what you think? --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]] ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>]]) 14:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Cosmotheism Disambiguation Page == |
|||
Will, I am registerd user "Oklahoma" I anonymously edited the Cosmotheism page and was banned by Mel Etitis for "Vandalism". If you look at the history you will see that what I did was not vandalism. Since then I have registerd as user "Oklahoma". The issue under dispute is whether Mordecay Nesiyahu "created the term" Cosmotheism. I gave evidence on the discussion page that he in fact did not, but Mel did not respond, he just changed it back and locked the page. Is this how Wikipedia is supposed to work? I think that it gives Wikipedia a "black eye" when someone puts up information that is demonstrably false. Could you tell me why Mel Etitis would do this? Some help in restoring truth to the Cosmotheism Disambiguation page would be greatly appreciated. |
|||
Thank you, registerd user "Oklahoma" |
Revision as of 00:31, 7 February 2006
- User talk:Willmcw/archive1
- User talk:Willmcw/archive2
- User talk:Willmcw/archive3
- User talk:Willmcw/archive4
- User talk:Willmcw/archive5 July 2005
- User talk:Willmcw/archive6 August 2005
- User talk:Willmcw/archive7 September 2005
- User talk:Willmcw/archive8 October 2005
- User talk:Willmcw/archive9 November 2005
- User talk:Willmcw/archive10 December 2005
Lyndon LaRouche associate Paul Gallagher
Did you ever find out the particulars of his conviction? The main article on LaRouche lists him as convicted but with no particulars. Thanks!--Beth Wellington 21:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Oh well. Thanks anyway. I was looking for a specific source and only found stuff on Larouche's own site.--Beth Wellington 01:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the link, but I was looking for non Larouche sources. See {http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/intro.htm#schiller} which explains that it was published in a pubication by "Larouche collaborators." Sigh. --Beth Wellington 22:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Can....
Can you transfer copies of all remaining Wikipedia links to my Userpage, including the one concerning editing a article. I am planning to create a article in which these may be listed as some sort of directory, so that Users will not have to go all over the place to find the info. that they are requesting. The Wiki-links that I already have in my own directory have been useful. In this "Wiki Directory", I can access different Wiki-sections rapidly and easily, instead of having to go all over the place. I believe that a Wiki-Directory, such as I've set up is a good idea. Also, can you archive my User Talk page for me. I don't want to mess it up, or get accused of vandalisim.
By the way, I did read the indicated source. 04:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Admin.
Where are you listed in the Wikipedia:Administrators:list of Administrators ? Martial Law 04:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
User:Willmcw can now be found at User:Will Beback
virago
see this: [1] Slrubenstein | Talk 23:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Just stopped by to thank you (belatedly) for your good wishes. In archiving my talk page this a.m., I came across your entry. Peace. deeceevoice 11:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Question
Why the change of name? Is it meant to confuse me, specifically? If so, success! Best regards, El_C 16:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I have never 'vandalised' an article on 'Cattle'
I must say that I found your note to me somewhat offensive as I never vandalised wikipedia or even looked at the article you refer to - on cattle. It may be that every AOL user comes up the same (as we sem to be classified as multiple users) but rest assured I have not done anything untoward. Ben
Dsol again
Please check disruptive edits by DSOL and Ryan Utt on the page Mark Ames
Attack on Pearl Harbor spoken article
Hi - I saw you were listed as working on the Attack on Pearl Harbor article - just letting you know I recorded this article and uploaded it a week or so ago (hope you didn't get too far w/ it). Thanks for your help w/ the spoken article project BTW. Athf1234 16:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Blocking over fair-use image disputes
Will, your input would be very much appreciated at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Blocking_over_fair-use_image_disputes, regarding the circumstances in which it is okay to block a user over a fair-use (or other copyright) dispute. We're trying to find a balance between wording that is tough on copyright violation but that also offers some protection to good-faith editors. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
A blast from the past. A Protest Warrior member is trying to rewrite the article to suit his personal view of the organisation. Any chance that you could take a look at it and see what you think? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Cosmotheism Disambiguation Page
Will, I am registerd user "Oklahoma" I anonymously edited the Cosmotheism page and was banned by Mel Etitis for "Vandalism". If you look at the history you will see that what I did was not vandalism. Since then I have registerd as user "Oklahoma". The issue under dispute is whether Mordecay Nesiyahu "created the term" Cosmotheism. I gave evidence on the discussion page that he in fact did not, but Mel did not respond, he just changed it back and locked the page. Is this how Wikipedia is supposed to work? I think that it gives Wikipedia a "black eye" when someone puts up information that is demonstrably false. Could you tell me why Mel Etitis would do this? Some help in restoring truth to the Cosmotheism Disambiguation page would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, registerd user "Oklahoma"