Jump to content

Talk:Alfred Pullin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
GA bot (talk | contribs)
m Transcluding GA review
on hold
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|09:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Sarastro1|Sarastro1]] ([[User talk:Sarastro1|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Sports and recreation|status=onreview|note=}}
{{GA nominee|09:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Sarastro1|Sarastro1]] ([[User talk:Sarastro1|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Sports and recreation|status=on hold|note=}}
{{WikiProject Cricket|class=|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Cricket|class=B|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Journalism}}
{{WikiProject Journalism}}



Revision as of 21:33, 9 September 2010

WikiProject iconCricket B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Cricket To-do list:
Article assessment
Verifiability
Cleanup
Infoboxes
Cricket people
Cricket teams & countries
Images
On this day in cricket
Umpires
Women
Update
Other
WikiProject iconJournalism Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alfred Pullin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Brad78 (talk) 21:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • One minor issue. Do you think it's worth saying Pullin was Welsh/British in the first line?
Done. Said British rather than Welsh as he had no association with Wales for most of his life. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Early life
  • Do you have any further details about Pullin's aborted rugby career or his refereeing?
No, it was very obscure and not really recorded. Just local stuff. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while this is a moot point regarding the review itself, should this be listed under journalism rather than sport?

Quite possibly, but I had him down as a sports journalist who was firmly associated with cricket. But on reflection, journalism would have made more sense! --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other than those two issues, this is a smashing, little piece. Brad78 (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    A short and sweet biography. It's very well-written and remains focused. It any further details come to light, it would be great to expand the article. Similarly the article uses few sources at the moment, so maybe that may help to expand it. Finally, there are no images, but that's not a requirement for GA. Brad78 (talk) 22:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]