Jump to content

Talk:Butlin's Barry Island: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Would have been a C class article if the main external cites were not dead
New Cites: new section
Line 6: Line 6:


:Agree, although we should wait for any other editors' views, as it was only recently moved here. Five days should be enough. [[User:Daicaregos|Daicaregos]] ([[User talk:Daicaregos|talk]]) 14:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
:Agree, although we should wait for any other editors' views, as it was only recently moved here. Five days should be enough. [[User:Daicaregos|Daicaregos]] ([[User talk:Daicaregos|talk]]) 14:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

== New Cites ==

Given the potential to move from Start Class to C Class, I've found secondary sources which are probably where the original tertiary cites were taken from and replaced all the dead sites with these new ones. [[User:Stuart.Jamieson|Stuart.Jamieson]] ([[User talk:Stuart.Jamieson|talk]]) 19:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:13, 13 September 2010

WikiProject iconWales Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Naming

Previously the article was titled Barry Island Resort now it's been renamed Butlins Barry Island while both names were applied to the camp the only cover part of it's lifespan perhaps we should consider Barry Island (Holiday Camp) with redirects from the Previous two? Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 17:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, although we should wait for any other editors' views, as it was only recently moved here. Five days should be enough. Daicaregos (talk) 14:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Cites

Given the potential to move from Start Class to C Class, I've found secondary sources which are probably where the original tertiary cites were taken from and replaced all the dead sites with these new ones. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 19:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]