Jump to content

User talk:Logicalthinker33: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jehovah's Witnesses: sounds reasonable to me
m my sign change
Line 24: Line 24:
Hi, just wondering why you removed the sources at the JW article [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jehovah%27s_Witnesses&diff=next&oldid=393723410 here]. I'm not complaining or criticizing but didn't fully understand and just wanted to be clear. Thanks [[User:JodyB|'''JodyB''']]<sub>[[User talk:JodyB| <font color="red">talk</font>]]</sub> 12:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, just wondering why you removed the sources at the JW article [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jehovah%27s_Witnesses&diff=next&oldid=393723410 here]. I'm not complaining or criticizing but didn't fully understand and just wanted to be clear. Thanks [[User:JodyB|'''JodyB''']]<sub>[[User talk:JodyB| <font color="red">talk</font>]]</sub> 12:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


:Actually, I went through those references and found that all those four are not necessary to support the statement given there. So I removed two of them which are from old magazines and thus saved the space.--<span style="border: 2px dashed #BDBDBD;">[[User talk:Logicalthinker33|'''<span style="background-color:#F7F7F7; color:#696969"> &nbsp;Logical Thinker&nbsp;</span>''']]</span> 16:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
:Actually, I went through those references and found that all those four are not necessary to support the statement given there. So I removed two of them which are from old magazines and thus saved the space.--[[User:Logicalthinker33|Logical Thinker]]''':'''<font color="green" style="font-size: 70%">[[User talk:Logicalthinker33|talk]]</font> 16:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


::Ok, sounds good to me. I didn't really think it was a vandal edit as that would not be your style but I'm always curious when I see sources removed from a page. Have a great day! [[User:JodyB|'''JodyB''']]<sub>[[User talk:JodyB| <font color="red">talk</font>]]</sub> 21:22, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
::Ok, sounds good to me. I didn't really think it was a vandal edit as that would not be your style but I'm always curious when I see sources removed from a page. Have a great day! [[User:JodyB|'''JodyB''']]<sub>[[User talk:JodyB| <font color="red">talk</font>]]</sub> 21:22, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:42, 3 November 2010

Logicalthinker33 says that he had quit contributing for Wikipedia-:).

User page

Go to my User page
Go to my User page

Talk

Leave me a message.
Leave me a message.

Sandbox

The testing zone
The testing zone

Barnstars

View shinies!
View shinies!

Logo shop

Request a logo for your user page
Request a logo for your user page

Contributions

What I've done.
What I've done.

E-mail

E-mail me.
E-mail me.

Local time: 05:28, 6 January 2025 IST [refresh].

Hi, just wondering why you removed the sources at the JW article here. I'm not complaining or criticizing but didn't fully understand and just wanted to be clear. Thanks JodyB talk 12:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I went through those references and found that all those four are not necessary to support the statement given there. So I removed two of them which are from old magazines and thus saved the space.--Logical Thinker:talk 16:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sounds good to me. I didn't really think it was a vandal edit as that would not be your style but I'm always curious when I see sources removed from a page. Have a great day! JodyB talk 21:22, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]