Jump to content

Talk:Chilean transition to democracy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rd232 (talk | contribs)
project banners
5 years outdated: new section
Line 20: Line 20:


I think that section is too leftist to be considered neutral. It is also too long, talking about the South America as a whole while this article should only be about the chilean transition. Please and a '''Template:Neutral''' if you concur.
I think that section is too leftist to be considered neutral. It is also too long, talking about the South America as a whole while this article should only be about the chilean transition. Please and a '''Template:Neutral''' if you concur.

== 5 years outdated ==

This article is 5 years outdated, since 2007 to 2011. Many things have happened since then, and lost of superficial thing are written here instead of core socio political issues.--[[Special:Contributions/190.101.78.192|190.101.78.192]] ([[User talk:190.101.78.192|talk]]) 02:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:48, 30 August 2011

WikiProject iconChile C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

1988 elections

I think it not fair to assume Pinochet wasn´t going to accept the 88 elections, and that what you have lightly done having a long section of mostly base-less guessing why he decided to accept the results. And all that of "worldwide context" is too long. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viva Chile (talkcontribs) 16:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be only about the transition - 2000s is not transition anymore! Other information should be in History of Chile (1990-). Luis Napoles (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will move the article to History of Chile (1991-), similar to History of Chile during the Parliamentary Era (1891-1925).Luis Napoles (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


No. I don't think it should...The current lead starts by saying

The Chilean transition to democracy (colloquially known in Chile as the Transición) began on September 11, 1980, when a Constitution establishing a transition itinerary was approved in a plebiscite. From March 11, 1981 to March 11, 1990, several organic constitutional laws were approved leading to the final restoration of democracy.

Clearly going back way before 1990.
Likeminas (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Then this article should be split. 2000s is not transition anymore.Luis Napoles (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Contexs and Causes' section

I think that section is too leftist to be considered neutral. It is also too long, talking about the South America as a whole while this article should only be about the chilean transition. Please and a Template:Neutral if you concur.

5 years outdated

This article is 5 years outdated, since 2007 to 2011. Many things have happened since then, and lost of superficial thing are written here instead of core socio political issues.--190.101.78.192 (talk) 02:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]