Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas D. Stauffer: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ohnoitsjamie (talk | contribs) more |
Bible1611man (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Douglas D. Stauffer}}) |
:({{Find sources|Douglas D. Stauffer}}) |
||
Has published a few books, but only real claim of notability is being a "featured speaker" on radio programs. Doesn't appear to meet [[WP:BIO]]. I suspect a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] as well given the page creator's edits. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC) |
Has published a few books, but only real claim of notability is being a "featured speaker" on radio programs. Doesn't appear to meet [[WP:BIO]]. I suspect a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] as well given the page creator's edits. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
A few books--three of the books are hardbacks and two of over 400 pages each in their fifth printings. Another significant factor is being an editor for Oxford University Press, something that many other parties cannot lay claim to. Some of the material is controversial and those most anxious to criticize and delete would probably like the material removed because of their conflicts of interest. |
|||
Revision as of 14:27, 7 December 2010
- Douglas D. Stauffer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has published a few books, but only real claim of notability is being a "featured speaker" on radio programs. Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO. I suspect a conflict of interest as well given the page creator's edits. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
A few books--three of the books are hardbacks and two of over 400 pages each in their fifth printings. Another significant factor is being an editor for Oxford University Press, something that many other parties cannot lay claim to. Some of the material is controversial and those most anxious to criticize and delete would probably like the material removed because of their conflicts of interest.