Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Ogden: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Jessica Ogden: Speedy delete |
d |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Delete'''. I could find no entry for any "Jessica Ogden" in BGMI (Biography and Genealogy Master Index - heck, I'm in there). A search for "Jessica Ogden" and archaeology in Lexis-Nexis Academic (all newspapers, all time periods) turned up a potential candidate who graduated from Dartmouth and got some accolades (potential USA Today academic award?). In any case, those two proprietary sources didn't turn up anything that convinced me that this article should be retained. Mind you, someone developing software for ground penetrating radar has the potential for being famous some day, but nothing shows that that day is today. --[[User:Quartermaster|Quartermaster]] ([[User talk:Quartermaster|talk]]) 20:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. I could find no entry for any "Jessica Ogden" in BGMI (Biography and Genealogy Master Index - heck, I'm in there). A search for "Jessica Ogden" and archaeology in Lexis-Nexis Academic (all newspapers, all time periods) turned up a potential candidate who graduated from Dartmouth and got some accolades (potential USA Today academic award?). In any case, those two proprietary sources didn't turn up anything that convinced me that this article should be retained. Mind you, someone developing software for ground penetrating radar has the potential for being famous some day, but nothing shows that that day is today. --[[User:Quartermaster|Quartermaster]] ([[User talk:Quartermaster|talk]]) 20:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Speedy delete''' … Does not come close to [[WP:ACADEMIC]] or even [[WP:GNG]] … why are we still discussing this one? Happy Editing! — '''{{User|70.21.16.94}}''' <sub>21:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)</sub> |
*'''Speedy delete''' … Does not come close to [[WP:ACADEMIC]] or even [[WP:GNG]] … why are we still discussing this one? Happy Editing! — '''{{User|70.21.16.94}}''' <sub>21:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)</sub> |
||
*'''Strong delete'''. According to [http://jrogden.wordpress.com/author/jrogden/ what seems to be her blog] she's two years out from a masters degree, so clearly [[WP:ACADEMIC]] doesn't apply. Potentially, [[WP:GNG]] could be used, if there were third-party sources about her, but there don't seem to be any. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 07:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:35, 21 December 2010
- Jessica Ogden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references and seemingly no notability, just someone doing their job. Heiro 21:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. —Heiro 21:15, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- delete, no claim of notability and no evidence for it, would have been candidate for speedy deletion (and in my view the AfD should be closed that way even if no one else contributes). Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. I could find no entry for any "Jessica Ogden" in BGMI (Biography and Genealogy Master Index - heck, I'm in there). A search for "Jessica Ogden" and archaeology in Lexis-Nexis Academic (all newspapers, all time periods) turned up a potential candidate who graduated from Dartmouth and got some accolades (potential USA Today academic award?). In any case, those two proprietary sources didn't turn up anything that convinced me that this article should be retained. Mind you, someone developing software for ground penetrating radar has the potential for being famous some day, but nothing shows that that day is today. --Quartermaster (talk) 20:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delete … Does not come close to WP:ACADEMIC or even WP:GNG … why are we still discussing this one? Happy Editing! — 70.21.16.94 (talk · contribs) 21:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Strong delete. According to what seems to be her blog she's two years out from a masters degree, so clearly WP:ACADEMIC doesn't apply. Potentially, WP:GNG could be used, if there were third-party sources about her, but there don't seem to be any. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)