User talk:Active Banana

Welcome!

hi

erm i'm not good at editting, i cited the article already, why was it removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystalfriend (talk • contribs) 16:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Active Banana, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Laurinavicius (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

For future reference

[1]

[2]

martin bormann

hullo why did you remove my martin bormann in popular culture ref

Sankurathri Foundation in need of monitoring and clean up

To do

Policy Regarding Unsourced Material

"If a claim is doubtful but not harmful, use the tag, which will add "citation needed," but remember to go back and remove the claim if no source is produced within a reasonable time." Please add the fact tag in the future, instead of simply undoing the changes that have been made.

You can choose to do otherwise, but the policy does suggest that you add fact tags for information that is not harmful. You're free to believe what you want, but it's hard for me to believe that being listed as an associated act is harmful to the article when the article already references that association.

Talkback

Hello, Active Banana. You have new messages at Basuupendra's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Active Banana. You have new messages at Achshar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Malizia Clinic pics

Hi Banana. I orig. left this article for user:tnxman, thinking that he deleted the images. But actually, commonsdelinker, a bot I presume, deleted it. tnXman did not yet respond, so I'm posting this to your talk page. Thank you.

You deleted two jpg files: Malizia-clinic-CT-imaging-suite.jpg and Malizia-clinic-exterior.jpg

These files were not copyright violations. They are pics from my personal collection which were not used on the Malizia Clinic site. I am a friend of the marketing dir. at the clinic and those pics are mine. Please check again. The pics are part of that same set, but they are unpublished. If you look carefully at malizia.org, you will see that the ones I uploaded were not the same as the ones on the site. Thank you. 1weezie23 (talk) 12:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC

Reason put by u was wrong

This is in response to ur message osted on 8th october. i had no time to reply.

by the way i have no obsession with the "nickname" and moreover superstar is not a nickname but a title conferred out of respect and admiration for his varied performances given by critics.

its u who had unnecessarily edited and written he is called a superstar cause of he had maddest fan following among female fans.

the entertainment one india article is actually talking about why he still remains the biggest superstar-- for that that was cited as the reason.Read the lines from the artcile ---"Why since four long decades 'Kakaji's' superstar status is still not passed on? Because he had the biggest and the maddest fan following, especially his female fans."---http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/interviews/2009/rajesh-khanna-interview-100609.html.

but why superstar he is called for that the reason is he was called as superstar by critics for his performances beginning with aradhana and giving consecutive 15 hits, then giving critically acclaimed box office hits continuously and consistently if not consecutively!!these reasons needent be mentioned as they are covered at various places.it need not be repeated so stop raising this issue. the artcile didnt need that wrong reson as put by u. infact i had no problems with the artcile untill 8th october ....as article looks pretty good.

Re: External links

I misinterpreted the bit about other official links, I suppose. Her Twitter is linked from her MySpace, so it is findable from an official source. Plus, her Twitter is used as a reference—for one of the very limited cases where a self-published source is acceptable—so there is a link to it within the article. However, minimizing the number of external links is different from WP:ELNO, which covers links to be avoided—and that's a large part of why I re-added the link on sight. —C.Fred (talk) 00:35, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Pamela Geller

Hey,

I'm monitoring this page and will help you deal with that pesky IP. NickCT (talk) 15:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:96.231.31.238_reported_by_User:NickCT_.28Result:_.29 NickCT (talk) 16:08, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:MissBarkley, Taylor Swift, Kanye West, and Beyonce Knowles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MissBarkley (talk) 22:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Annoying Orange

I used Grapefruit just as an example. I could have said 'Knife' or 'Liam' - would you have then removed those? What is your criteria for "trivial"? Far but no Cigar (talk) 15:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

What is the evidence that 'Knife' or 'Liam' are not trivial? Again, What is your criteria for "trivial"? I can go looking for some sources, but I need to understand what the standard is, first. Far but no Cigar (talk) 15:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Shearography

You forgot to check the Google News Archives -- plenty of stuff there. Someone else has already removed the PROD, though. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Otaki Forks Article

By the sounds of it you have not actually been to Tararua Forest Park or Otaki forks, they are differet and a seperate page for each is appropriate.

Yeah its the main way through to the Tararua Forest. The Tararua forest is a FORREST compared to Otaki Forks which is a visitor and tourist location. Have you been there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postitnz (talk • contribs) 01:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Fixing the tone is hardly an issue and can be fixed easily. In what way is it not properly sourced? Its sourced with New Zealand goverment information, I can hardly think of a better source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postitnz (talk • contribs) 01:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)