Jump to content

User talk:Glenfarclas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Ayse Fahri - ""
Line 96: Line 96:
with thanks
with thanks


Ayse00:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)~ <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ayse Fahri|Ayse Fahri]] ([[User talk:Ayse Fahri|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ayse Fahri|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Ayse00:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)~

Revision as of 00:38, 30 December 2010


This editor is a Veteran Editor and is entitled to display this Iron Editor Star.

Oakwood Law Group

Hi, at Talk:Oakwood Law Group you wrote "Being a law firm that handles patent applications does create notability", but didn't you mean to say "...does NOT create notability"? Cheers, --CliffC (talk) 02:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, yes, thanks! (A Freudian slip? Nah, don't think so ;)  Glenfarclas  (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We have to be careful about giving lawyers anything to grab on to.  :) CliffC (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:AspergesMe.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Acather96 (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message: As I explained on the description box, Candombe was Invented in Uruguay, your false accusations prove the lack of knowledge and therefore should restraint from Undoing my Edits, I recommend you experiment with a history book of the region from where I assume you know nothing. My edits are as political as fixing the the page of an american founding father when false history is added to it. Regards CMCmazzoni87 (talk) 17:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gardel Birthplace

Info which confirms French birth. Now in article. Tapered (talk) 02:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blog post does not confirm anything, unfortunately. The will could still be valid even if the factual recitals in it were false.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 02:40, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeri Lilov (2nd nomination), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 3#Valeri Lilov. Cunard (talk) 09:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holistic ten perspective for deletion

The article Holistic ten perspective is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holistic ten perspective until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Corvus cornixtalk 19:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected Page

You redirected an article I was working on to a disambiguation page and I was wondering what constitutes a "notable" artist? Also if the article was ambiguos should I re-title it more specifically (although the artists are known as "K.M")? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottebya (talkcontribs) 22:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A notable artist would be one who meets the criteria in the inclusion guideline WP:ARTIST (or, more generally, WP:BIO, or e.g. for musicians WP:MUSICBIO). Most commonly, this means that the person "[h]as been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself." I didn't see evidence that K.M met any of those criteria, but if you think they do then you can revert my redirect and add appropriate citations to reliable sources that would show their notability. Regards—  Glenfarclas  (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion also at EAR here. --CliffC (talk) 23:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Hammond, Jr. (disambiguation)

Re John Hammond, Jr. (disambiguation):
Replies for you at talk:John Hammond, Jr. (disambiguation)#My bad lead & ...#Piped link & real other options.
--Jerzyt 05:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, sorry about that.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 07:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a mistake but you shouldn't have warned me, I redirected, just after that you marked it for proposed deletion and it automatically sent it to me. Go and warn this user: User talk:Scrollofmystery :) Juze 10:58, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved it there. Juze 11:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry about that. I don't always double-check when Twinkle does something odd. Thanks for taking care of that, Juze.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 19:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to clean up a few more redirects, there is also Wikiracing and Wiki-Hopping. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks, Gogo.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 07:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD of C0c0n

As you added "No evidence of significant coverage or other indicia of notability that I can find for this conference. Glenfarclas (talk) 04:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)" at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/C0c0n : i don't know if google is down at your end but you can see the conference videos (as they also being cited)at http://stagevu.com/uservideos/c0c0n and speakers list at http://www.informationsecurityday.com/c0c0n/speakers.html

See also

http://blog.elearnsecurity.com/2010/08/proud-sponsors-of-c0c0n-conference-2010.html
http://www.hindu.com/2010/08/07/stories/2010080762610300.htm
http://www.cochinsquare.com/announcing-c0c0n-2010-%E2%80%93-international-information-security-day-in-kochi-on-5th-and-6th-aug-2010/
http://keralaitnews.com/news-outside-parks/kochi/1247-c0c0n-security-hacking-conference

even if you think that the c0c0n page should be deleted: you are free to do it at your will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yashartha Chaturvedi (talkcontribs) 18:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Luminous-Lint

I disagree with this proposal of yours and have revived the article after it was deleted by another admin. You are of course fully entitled to take the article to AfD. -- Hoary (talk) 03:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DEar Glenfarclas,

I need assistance + guidance please... My article, Branding National Myths and Symbols' has been deleted recently. please tell me what I need to do to keep it? with thanks

Ayse00:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayse Fahri (talkcontribs)