Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Frederick Theodore Frelinghuysen: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Sentence structure
Closed, not promoted
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''Weak Oppose'''. I like the portrait, but unfortunately the low DOF removes much of the the thumbnail detail. '''''[[User:Nauticashades|Nautica]]''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Nauticashades|Shad]]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/Nauticashades|es]]</font>''' 17:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
*'''Weak Oppose'''. I like the portrait, but unfortunately the low DOF removes much of the the thumbnail detail. '''''[[User:Nauticashades|Nautica]]''<font color="black">[[User Talk:Nauticashades|Shad]]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/Nauticashades|es]]</font>''' 17:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
<!-- additional votes go above this line -->
<!-- additional votes go above this line -->
{{FPCresult|Not Promoted| }} --[[User:Makeemlighter|Makeemlighter]] ([[User talk:Makeemlighter|talk]]) 08:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
{{-}}
{{-}}



Revision as of 08:55, 18 January 2011

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2011 at 05:18:36 (UTC)

Original - Frederick Theodore Frelinghuysen the 29th Secretary of State of the United States
Reason
High Ev as lead image. very good for its time
Articles in which this image appears
Frederick Theodore Frelinghuysen, List of Secretaries of State of the United States, List of United States Senators from New Jersey, 1844 Whig National Convention,
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator
Mathew Brady and Levin Corbin Handy
Comment This image and this one are of the same nature and both are featured. Spongie555 (talk) 04:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Granted, but I would honestly say those two are stronger. Both have slightly better compositions; they both draw you into the image, and say something about the subject. Frelinghuysen just looks bored. I also note that the DOF is stronger on both of them. I agree that, in practice, portrait FPs are a little odd, but I don't think this one has the umph. J Milburn (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He looks more serious then bored. Also probably beacause he had to sit still for a long time to pose he would look bored because I know I would(last part personal opinion). Spongie555 (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 08:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]