User talk:LedRush/Amanda Knox: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::This is 98.118.62.140 typing. I've created an account for myself; I am [[User:Tweedledee2011|Tweedledee2011]] |
::This is 98.118.62.140 typing. I've created an account for myself; I am [[User:Tweedledee2011|Tweedledee2011]] |
||
::[[User:Tweedledee2011|Tweedledee2011]] ([[User talk:Tweedledee2011|talk]]) 21:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC) |
::[[User:Tweedledee2011|Tweedledee2011]] ([[User talk:Tweedledee2011|talk]]) 21:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Amanda Knox in the news == |
|||
Read [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/07/amanda-knox-lawyers-try-t_n_819686.html here] [[User:Tweedledee2011|Tweedledee2011]] ([[User talk:Tweedledee2011|talk]]) 22:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:02, 7 February 2011
I am not sure if I am doing this right, but I hope to start an article here.LedRush (talk) 04:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
I suggest that we find a similar article, the format of which we want to follow, then cut & paste that article source code here and modify the article to change it to Amanda Knox information. If we do this, then it will leave very little room for someone to challenge the form of the article. 98.118.62.140 (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was planning on using the older Amanda Knox article or the Meredith Kercher article as a foundation, but perhaps your plan is better. Any suggestions?LedRush (talk) 19:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Am VB tonight and next day or so - will get back to you 98.118.62.140 (talk) 20:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- This is 98.118.62.140 typing. I've created an account for myself; I am Tweedledee2011
- Tweedledee2011 (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Amanda Knox in the news
Read here Tweedledee2011 (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)