Mean reciprocal rank: Difference between revisions
upper summation index is |Q|, not Q |
m Bot: fixing section wikilinks |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
This basic definition does not specify what to do if... |
This basic definition does not specify what to do if... |
||
# none of the proposed results are correct (use mean reciprocal rank 0), or if |
# none of the proposed results are correct (use mean reciprocal rank 0), or if |
||
# there are multiple correct answers in the list. Consider using [[Information_retrieval# |
# there are multiple correct answers in the list. Consider using [[Information_retrieval#Mean_average_precision|mean average precision (MAP)]]. |
||
See also [[Information retrieval]] and [[Question answering]]<ref>{{cite conference | title=Evaluating web-based question answering systems | booktitle=Proceedings of LREC | author=D. R. Radev, H. Qi, H. Wu, W. Fan |year=2002 }}</ref>. |
See also [[Information retrieval]] and [[Question answering]]<ref>{{cite conference | title=Evaluating web-based question answering systems | booktitle=Proceedings of LREC | author=D. R. Radev, H. Qi, H. Wu, W. Fan |year=2002 }}</ref>. |
Revision as of 05:48, 9 February 2011
Mean reciprocal rank is a statistic for evaluating any process that produces a list of possible responses to a query, ordered by probability of correctness. The reciprocal rank of a query response is the multiplicative inverse of the rank of the first correct answer. The mean reciprocal rank is the average of the reciprocal ranks of results for a sample of queries Q[1]:
Example
For example, suppose we have the following three sample queries for a system that tries to translate English words to their plurals. In each case, the system makes three guesses, with the first one being the one it thinks is most likely correct:
Query | Results | Correct response | Rank | Reciprocal rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
cat | catten, cati, cats | cats | 3 | 1/3 |
torus | torii, tori, toruses | tori | 2 | 1/2 |
virus | viruses, virii, viri | viruses | 1 | 1 |
Given those three samples, we could calculate the mean reciprocal rank as (1/3 + 1/2 + 1)/3 = 11/18 or about 0.61.
This basic definition does not specify what to do if...
- none of the proposed results are correct (use mean reciprocal rank 0), or if
- there are multiple correct answers in the list. Consider using mean average precision (MAP).
See also Information retrieval and Question answering[2].
References
- ^ E.M. Voorhees (1999). "Proceedings of the 8th Text Retrieval Conference". TREC-8 Question Answering Track Report. pp. 77–82.
{{cite conference}}
: Unknown parameter|booktitle=
ignored (|book-title=
suggested) (help) - ^ D. R. Radev, H. Qi, H. Wu, W. Fan (2002). "Evaluating web-based question answering systems". Proceedings of LREC.
{{cite conference}}
: Unknown parameter|booktitle=
ignored (|book-title=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)