Jump to content

Talk:Rewilding: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Classifying for WP Zoo
Line 20: Line 20:
Dr Fraser is the author of the book entitled Rewilding the World: Dispatches from the Conservation Revolution, published late last year. It would seem that Dr Fraser is sufficiently informed on the current trends in rewidling for her entry to Wikipedia about this subject to have considerable merit. I urge people to think carefully (and do their research) before making any changes.
Dr Fraser is the author of the book entitled Rewilding the World: Dispatches from the Conservation Revolution, published late last year. It would seem that Dr Fraser is sufficiently informed on the current trends in rewidling for her entry to Wikipedia about this subject to have considerable merit. I urge people to think carefully (and do their research) before making any changes.
Dr Mark Fisher, Wildlands Research institute, University of Leeds [[User:Self willed|Self willed]] ([[User talk:Self willed|talk]]) 14:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Dr Mark Fisher, Wildlands Research institute, University of Leeds [[User:Self willed|Self willed]] ([[User talk:Self willed|talk]]) 14:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rewilding_(Carnivores)]] ==

Wikipedians researching this article's topic may be interested in the above AfD. Note also that an account which edited this article and related articles, [[User:Leogard]], was indefinitely banned as a suspected sockpuppet in February of 2011 in a related investigation: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/China's Tiger/Archive]]. --[[User:Struthious_Bandersnatch|❨Ṩtruthious '''ℬ'''andersnatch❩]] 05:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:27, 4 March 2011

I am losing track here since the previous discussion on rewilding seems to have disappeared, but the meaning of rewilding must not be sidetracked down a road that only leads to a project on releasing tigers. It has much, much wider implicatiohns than that, as is reflected in this version of the article - or wikipedia just becomes propaganda for one view. 11:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

More reliable references

It seems that there is a misunderstand from a particular user regarding Wikipedia's policies. Wikipedia is trying to become a more reliable site, with its articles having more support from reliable references.

It seems that the previous edit of the Rewilding page based on Rewilding of Endangered Carnivores and Tigers seem to be the most updated rewilding issue everyone is talking about. Furthermore, if one were to really look through the references, we can see that the previous article seems much more supported.

It may seem more one-sided to some, however at least it has good support for its statements and more relevant to today's "rewilding" process.

LeoGard (talk) 16:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support for Dr Caroline Fraser

Dr Fraser is the author of the book entitled Rewilding the World: Dispatches from the Conservation Revolution, published late last year. It would seem that Dr Fraser is sufficiently informed on the current trends in rewidling for her entry to Wikipedia about this subject to have considerable merit. I urge people to think carefully (and do their research) before making any changes. Dr Mark Fisher, Wildlands Research institute, University of Leeds Self willed (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians researching this article's topic may be interested in the above AfD. Note also that an account which edited this article and related articles, User:Leogard, was indefinitely banned as a suspected sockpuppet in February of 2011 in a related investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/China's Tiger/Archive. --❨Ṩtruthious andersnatch❩ 05:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]