Talk:A Separation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:18, 22 February 2011

Film: Persian Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Persian cinema task force.

Iran Start‑class Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A news item involving A Separation was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 February 2011.

Wikipedia

Plot

The last line of the plot makes no sense. "Razieh is found to not be guilty of the incident..." There is no previous mention of her being charged. It earlier refers only to Razieh's husband and Nader being charged. Tiddy (talk) 03:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen the film? I added the plot section, but I only based it on the one on German Wikipedia so I'm just as confused. Would be appreciated if someone who actually has seen the movie could go through the plot and adjust it. Right now there are lots of details and emphasis that I'm not entirely comfortable with. Smetanahue (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smet ! You'll have to excuse my imput, this is my first login on Wikipedia (a Wikivirgin, if you will). I agree with Tiddy that the last paragraph of the plot doesn't read rationally. While I appreciate your submission, may I make the suggestion that you just temporarily remove that part until you or someone else can re-add it more comprehensibly ? Roxannek (talk) 03:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks both Smet & Roxannek. I haven't seen the film either but was interested in trying to understand the plot. 121.217.158.197 (talk) 05:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Hi Smet !  You'll have to excuse my imput, this is my first login on Wikipedia (a Wikivirgin, if you will).  I agree with Tiddy that the last paragraph of the plot doesn't read rationally.  While I appreciate your submission, may I make the suggestion that you just temporarily remove that part until you or someone else can re-add it more comprehensibly ?  [[User:Roxannek|Roxannek]] ([[User talk:Roxannek|talk]]) 03:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 <br />
-Thanks both Smet & Roxannek. I haven't seen the film either but was interested in trying to understand the plot. [[Special:Contributions/121.217.158.197|121.217.158.197]] ([[User talk:121.217.158.197|talk]]) 05:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
+:Thanks both Smet & Roxannek. I haven't seen the film either but was interested in trying to understand the plot. [[Special:Contributions/121.217.158.197|121.217.158.197]] ([[User talk:121.217.158.197|talk]]) 05:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)