Talk:Wet moon: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
RM tag |
m remove TOC |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{move|Wet moon}} |
{{move|Wet moon}}{{noTOC}} |
||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
*The term "Wet moon" has been in longer use for this lunar phase phenomenon than "Cheshire moon", which is a relative - but noted - neologism.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 20:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
*The term "Wet moon" has been in longer use for this lunar phase phenomenon than "Cheshire moon", which is a relative - but noted - neologism.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 20:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:56, 28 February 2006
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.Template:NoTOC
Support
- The term "Wet moon" has been in longer use for this lunar phase phenomenon than "Cheshire moon", which is a relative - but noted - neologism.--み使い Mitsukai 20:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Oppose
Discussion
Earlier discussions
See Talk:Rising crescent moon. --Eric Forste 23:42, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Vfd
On 12 Jan 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cheshire moon for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 00:35, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)