Talk:M-46 (Michigan highway): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Transcluding GA review |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{U.S. Roads WikiProject|state=MI|needs-map=no|importance=Mid|class=C|sort=M-046|photo=Michigan}} |
{{U.S. Roads WikiProject|state=MI|needs-map=no|importance=Mid|class=C|sort=M-046|photo=Michigan}} |
||
{{dyktalk|2 March|2011|entry=... that '''[[M-46 (Michigan highway)|M-46]]''' is only one of three trans-peninsular [[Michigan Highway System|state highways]] in the [[Lower Peninsula of Michigan]]?}} |
{{dyktalk|2 March|2011|entry=... that '''[[M-46 (Michigan highway)|M-46]]''' is only one of three trans-peninsular [[Michigan Highway System|state highways]] in the [[Lower Peninsula of Michigan]]?}} |
||
{{Talk:M-46 (Michigan highway)/GA1}} |
Revision as of 22:16, 4 March 2011
M-46 (Michigan highway) is currently a Transport good article nominee. Nominated by Imzadi 1979 → at 10:43, 26 February 2011 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.
|
U.S. Roads: Michigan C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from M-46 (Michigan highway) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:M-46 (Michigan highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose: (MoS):
- prose: (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
1. enters Saginaw proper. Suggest - removeproper
2. Van Dyke Road.Between Elmer. Between needs a space.
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- For number 1, that would be wrong. The "proper" is there to distinguish between the city of Saginaw and Saginaw Charter Township, so it's needed. As for the second, that easy fix has been applied. Imzadi 1979 → 00:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ah fair enough and meh I like to take a hands of approach to GA reviews. Anyway nice work. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees currently on hold
- Good article nominees on review
- C-Class Michigan road transport articles
- Mid-importance Michigan road transport articles
- C-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- Michigan road transport articles
- C-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Michigan
- Wikipedia requested photographs of roads in Michigan
- U.S. road transport articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles