Talk:Rifle: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I've tagged the page with cleanup as there is some repitition and it lacks narrative coherence. [[User:Anurag Garg|Anurag Garg]] 15:01, 10 November 2005 (UTC) |
I've tagged the page with cleanup as there is some repitition and it lacks narrative coherence. [[User:Anurag Garg|Anurag Garg]] 15:01, 10 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
The reference to muskets as non-rifled bears examination; recall, the .58 Springfield of the U.S. Civil War was a |
The reference to muskets as non-rifled bears examination; recall, the .58 Springfield of the U.S. Civil War was a ' musket... --squadfifteen, 23/11/05 |
||
I deleted the "WW1 nightmare" paragraph as too POV and not relevant to rifles. The effect of massed rifles was seen in the US Civil War, besides. I also deleted the reference to 155 howitzers as irrelevant. -- |
I deleted the "WW1 nightmare" paragraph as too POV and not relevant to rifles. The effect of massed rifles was seen in the US Civil War, besides. I also deleted the reference to 155 howitzers as irrelevant. --\jack off me in the bathroom |
||
Should the XM8 be listed as a type of rifle when it's a model of several different types? |
Should the XM8 be listed as a type of rifle when it's a model of several different types?It was completely out of place. [[User:Joffeloff|Joffeloff]] 13:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
:No, it shouldn't - I removed it. It was completely out of place. [[User:Joffeloff|Joffeloff]] 13:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Made a few minor (anon) edits correcting factual errors. |
Made a few minor (anon) edits correcting factual errors. |
||
Revision as of 17:45, 4 May 2006
I found this article blank. I have changed it back to the version before.
I've tagged the page with cleanup as there is some repitition and it lacks narrative coherence. Anurag Garg 15:01, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
The reference to muskets as non-rifled bears examination; recall, the .58 Springfield of the U.S. Civil War was a ' musket... --squadfifteen, 23/11/05
I deleted the "WW1 nightmare" paragraph as too POV and not relevant to rifles. The effect of massed rifles was seen in the US Civil War, besides. I also deleted the reference to 155 howitzers as irrelevant. --\jack off me in the bathroom
Should the XM8 be listed as a type of rifle when it's a model of several different types?It was completely out of place. Joffeloff 13:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Made a few minor (anon) edits correcting factual errors. --Daler 01:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC)