Talk:154CM: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
not a metalworking article |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This article was first proposed to be moved to Wiktionary and then proposed for deletion. I do not believe either of these should be in effect. It is a very encyclopedic article although more could be added.--[[User:Ryan Vesey|Ryan Vesey]] ([[User talk:Ryan Vesey|talk]]) 16:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC) |
This article was first proposed to be moved to Wiktionary and then proposed for deletion. I do not believe either of these should be in effect. It is a very encyclopedic article although more could be added.--[[User:Ryan Vesey|Ryan Vesey]] ([[User talk:Ryan Vesey|talk]]) 16:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
:It was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=154CM&action=history proposed for deletion] and later [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=154CM&diff=417550464&oldid=417460629 proposed to be moved to Wiktionary]. It can stay here, but I will remove unsourced ad part [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 13:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC) |
:It was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=154CM&action=history proposed for deletion] and later [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=154CM&diff=417550464&oldid=417460629 proposed to be moved to Wiktionary]. It can stay here, but I will remove unsourced ad part [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 13:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
::I think this page should stay in the encyclopedia portion, since it's hardly a definition. [[User:M3I5K7E|M3I5K7E]] ([[User talk:M3I5K7E|talk]]) 18:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:00, 28 June 2011
Blades (inactive) | ||||
|
Chemistry Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Hang on
This article was first proposed to be moved to Wiktionary and then proposed for deletion. I do not believe either of these should be in effect. It is a very encyclopedic article although more could be added.--Ryan Vesey (talk) 16:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- It was proposed for deletion and later proposed to be moved to Wiktionary. It can stay here, but I will remove unsourced ad part Bulwersator (talk) 13:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- I think this page should stay in the encyclopedia portion, since it's hardly a definition. M3I5K7E (talk) 18:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)