Talk:Wet moon: Difference between revisions
m moved Talk:Cheshire moon to Talk:Wet moon: WP:RM |
Problems with ''In folklore'' Section |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Vfd== |
==Vfd== |
||
On 12 Jan 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cheshire moon]] for a record of the discussion. —[[User:Korath|Korath]] ([[User talk:Korath|Talk]]) 00:35, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC) |
On 12 Jan 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cheshire moon]] for a record of the discussion. —[[User:Korath|Korath]] ([[User talk:Korath|Talk]]) 00:35, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC) |
||
== Problems with ''In folklore'' Section == |
|||
I believe we need someone well-versed in astronomy as well as Hawaiian folklore and astrology to straighten out the ''In folklore'' section, which appears to me to be full of contradictions with the rest of the article and with itself. |
|||
As I understand it, the moon is said to be "Dry" when the crescent horns appear nearly vertical; i.e., the bowl of the moon is upright and it captures falling rain, preventing much of it from reaching the Earth. According to other sections of the article, this occurs during winter in the northern hemisphere. However, the folklore section says that Hawaiians call the moon the "Dripping wet moon" typically between January 20 - February 18, which is the height of winter. Something seems amiss! |
|||
Is this only a matter of my mistaken interpretation? (I.e., "Dripping wet" being in the literal sense of only just beginning to drip, as opposed to my interpretation of "Dripping wet" in the common idiomatic sense of being extremely wet, in other words pouring out rapidly and inundating the Earth below?) |
Revision as of 06:51, 25 March 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 21:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Support
- The term "Wet moon" has been in longer use for this lunar phase phenomenon than "Cheshire moon", which is a relative - but noted - neologism.--み使い Mitsukai 20:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Support sounds right. Gryffindor 18:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Earlier discussions
See Talk:Rising crescent moon. --Eric Forste 23:42, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Vfd
On 12 Jan 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cheshire moon for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 00:35, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Problems with In folklore Section
I believe we need someone well-versed in astronomy as well as Hawaiian folklore and astrology to straighten out the In folklore section, which appears to me to be full of contradictions with the rest of the article and with itself.
As I understand it, the moon is said to be "Dry" when the crescent horns appear nearly vertical; i.e., the bowl of the moon is upright and it captures falling rain, preventing much of it from reaching the Earth. According to other sections of the article, this occurs during winter in the northern hemisphere. However, the folklore section says that Hawaiians call the moon the "Dripping wet moon" typically between January 20 - February 18, which is the height of winter. Something seems amiss!
Is this only a matter of my mistaken interpretation? (I.e., "Dripping wet" being in the literal sense of only just beginning to drip, as opposed to my interpretation of "Dripping wet" in the common idiomatic sense of being extremely wet, in other words pouring out rapidly and inundating the Earth below?)