Jump to content

Vertical integration: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Hvh22 (talk | contribs)
18 edits
Line 120: Line 120:
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
14. Legner, C.; Vogel, T.: Leveraging Web Services for Implementing Vertical Industry Standards: A Model for Service-Based Interoperability, in: Electronic Markets, 18, 1, 2008, pp. 39-52.


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==

Revision as of 17:59, 25 May 2011

A diagram illustrating vertical integration and contrasting it with horizontal integration.

In microeconomics and management, the term vertical integration describes a style of management control. Vertically integrated companies in a supply chain are united through a common owner. Usually each member of the supply chain produces a different product or (market-specific) service, and the products combine to satisfy a common need. It is contrasted with horizontal integration.

Vertical integration is one method of avoiding the hold-up problem. A monopoly produced through vertical integration is called a vertical monopoly, although it might be more appropriate to speak of this as some form of cartel.

Nineteenth century steel tycoon Andrew Carnegie introduced the concept and use of vertical integration. {{citation}}: Empty citation (help) This led other businesspeople to use the system to promote better financial growth and efficiency in their businesses.

Three types

Vertical integration is the degree to which a firm owns its downstream suppliers and its upstream buyers. Contrary to horizontal integration, which is a consolidation of many firms that handle the same part of the production process, vertical integration is typified by one firm engaged in different parts of production (e.g. growing raw materials manufacturing, transporting, marketing, and/or retailing).

There are three varieties: backward (upstream) vertical integration, forward (downstream) vertical integration, and balanced (both upstream and downstream) vertical integration.

  • A company exhibits backward vertical integration when it controls subsidiaries that produce some of the inputs used in the production of its products. For example, an automobile company may own a tire company, a glass company, and a metal company. Control of these three subsidiaries is intended to create a stable supply of inputs and ensure a consistent quality in their final product. It was the main business approach of Ford and other car companies in the 1920s, who sought to minimize costs by centralizing the production of cars and car parts.
  • A company tends toward forward vertical integration when it controls distribution centers and retailers where its products are sold.
  • Balanced vertical integration means a firm controls all of these components, from raw materials to final delivery.

The three varieties noted are only abstractions; actual firms employ a wide variety of subtle variations. Suppliers are often contractors, not legally owned subsidiaries. Still, a client may effectively control a supplier if their contract solely assures the supplier's profitability. Distribution and retail partnerships exhibit similarly wide ranges of complexity and interdependence. In relatively open capitalist contexts, pure vertical integration by explicit ownership is uncommon—and distributing ownership is commonly a strategy for distributing risks.

Examples

One of the earliest, largest and most famous examples of vertical integration was the Carnegie Steel company. The company controlled not only the mills where the steel was made, but also the mines where the iron ore was extracted, the coal mines that supplied the coal, the ships that transported the iron ore and the railroads that transported the coal to the factory, the coke ovens where the coal was cooked, etc. The company also focused heavily on developing talent internally from the bottom up, rather than importing it from other companies.[1] Later on, Carnegie even established an institute of higher learning to teach the steel processes to the next generation.

American Apparel

American Apparel is a fashion retailer and manufacturer that actually advertises itself as a vertically integrated industrial company.[2][3] The brand is based in downtown Los Angeles, where from a single building they control the dyeing, finishing, designing, sewing, cutting, marketing and distribution of the company's product.[3][4][5] The company shoots and distributes its own advertisements, often using its own employees as subjects.[2][6] It also owns and operates each of its retail locations as opposed to franchising.[7] According to the management, the vertically integrated model allows the company to design, cut, distribute and sell an item globally in the span of a week.[8] The original founder Dov Charney has remained the majority shareholder and CEO.[9] Since the company controls both the production and distribution of its product, it is an example of a balanced vertically integrated corporation.

Oil industry

Oil companies, both multinational (such as ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, ConocoPhillips or BP) and national (e.g. Petronas) often adopt a vertically integrated structure. This means that they are active along the entire supply chain from locating crude oil deposits, drilling and extracting crude, transporting it around the world, refining it into petroleum products such as petrol/gasoline, to distributing the fuel to company-owned retail stations, for sale to consumers.

Reliance

The Indian petrochemical giant Reliance Industries is a great example of vertical integration in modern business. Reliance's backward integration into polyester fibres from textiles and further into petrochemicals was started by Dhirubhai Ambani. Reliance has entered the oil and natural gas sector, along with retail sector. Reliance now has a complete vertical product portfolio from oil and gas production, refining, petrochemicals, synthetic garments and retail outlets.

Motion picture industry

From the early 1920s through the early 1950s, the American motion picture industry was led by five vertically integrated studios--Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Paramount, Warner Bros., 20th Century Fox, and RKO.[10] The studios were responsible for showing films in a large network of theaters that they controlled. The issue of vertical integration (also known as common ownership) has been a main focus of policy makers because of the possibility of anti-competitive behaviors affiliated with market influence. For example, in United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., the five vertically integrated studios were ordered to sell off their theater chains, more so their exhibition stage from vertical integration production and distribution stages. (United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 1948).[11].The prevalence of vertical integration wholly redetermined the relationships between both studios and networks and modified criterion in financing. Networks began arranging content initiated by commonly owned studios and stipulated a portion of the syndication revenues in order for a show to gain a spot on the schedule if it was produced by a studio without common ownership.[12]

Apple

Apple Inc. have been listed as an example of vertical integration, specifically with many elements of the ecosystem for the iPhone and iPad, where they control the processor, the hardware and the software.[13] Hardware itself is not typically manufactured by Apple, but third-party manufacturers such as Hon Hai Foxconn or Asus Pegatron manufacture Apple's products to their specifications.

Problems and benefits

There are internal and external (e.g. society-wide) gains and losses due to vertical integration. They will differ according to the state of technology in the industries involved, roughly corresponding to the stages of the industry lifecycle.

Static technology

This is the simplest case, where the gains and losses have been studied extensively.

Internal gains:

Vertical expansion

Vertical expansion, in economics, is the growth of a business enterprise through the acquisition of companies that produce the intermediate goods needed by the business or help market and distribute its product. Such expansion is desired because it secures the supplies needed by the firm to produce its product and the market needed to sell the product. The result is a more efficient business with lower costs and more profits.

Related is lateral expansion, which is the growth of a business enterprise through the acquisition of similar firms, in the hope of achieving economies of scale.

Vertical expansion is also known as a vertical acquisition. Vertical expansion or acquisitions can also be used to increase scales and to gain market power. The acquisition of DirectTV by News Corporation is an example of forward vertical expansion or acquisition. DirectTV is a satellite TV company through which News Corporation can distribute more of its media content: news, movies, and television shows. The pending acquisition of NBC by Comcast Cable (as of January 16, 2010) is an example of forward vertical integration.

In the United States, protecting the public from communications monopolies that can be built in this way is one of the missions of the Federal Communications Commission.

See also

References

  1. ^ Folsom, Burton The Myth of the Robber Barons 5th edition. 2007. pg 65 "only we can develop ability and hold it in our service. Every year should be marked by the promotion of one or more of our young men."
  2. ^ a b Machosky, Michael (February 13, 2006). "Vertical Integration". Pittsburgh Tribune Review. Retrieved 2008-06-12."- the buzzword now is "vertical integration.""
  3. ^ a b Greenberg, David (May 31, 2004). "Sew what? American Apparel founder Dov Charney wants to de-emphasize the fact he doesn't use sweatshop labor; he's just trying to sell a better T-shirt - People". Los Angeles Business Journal. Archived from the original on 2008-04-01. Retrieved 2008-03-26.
  4. ^ "American Apparel Purchases Assets from U.S. Dyeing & Finishing, Inc" (Press release). Business Wire. May 2008. Retrieved June 2008. {{cite press release}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  5. ^ Dov Charney (2006). Charlie Rose (YouTube). PBS. {{cite AV media}}: External link in |medium= (help) 32:40
  6. ^ Palmeri, Christopher (2005-06-27). "Living on the Edge at American Apparel". Businessweek. Retrieved 2008-03-22. "Charney takes many of the photos himself, often using company employees as models as well as people he finds on the street."
  7. ^ Hirschfeld, Bob (December 19, 2006). "American Apparel Rides Marketing, Site-Selection to Success". Retail Traffic Mag.
  8. ^ Dov Charney (2006). Charlie Rose (YouTube). PBS. {{cite AV media}}: External link in |medium= (help)@32:40
  9. ^ Kang, Stephanie (December 19, 2006). "American Apparel Seeks Growth Through An Unusual Deal". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2008-03-21.
  10. ^ Thorburn, David and Jenkins, Henry (eds)(2003) Rethinking Media Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.283.
  11. ^ Oba, Goro, and Chan-Olmstead, Sylvia. "Self-Dealing or Market Transaction?: An Exploratory Study of Vertical Integration in the U.S. Television Syndication Market." Journal of Media Economics 19.2 (2006): 99-118. Communication & Mass Media Complete.
  12. ^ Lotz, Amanda D. (2007) "The Television Will Be Revolutionized".New York, NY: New York University Press. p.87
  13. ^ Newsweek article

14. Legner, C.; Vogel, T.: Leveraging Web Services for Implementing Vertical Industry Standards: A Model for Service-Based Interoperability, in: Electronic Markets, 18, 1, 2008, pp. 39-52.

Bibliography

  • Martin K. Perry. "Vertical Integration: Determinants and Effects". Chapter 4 in: Handbook of Industrial Organization. North Holland, 1988.
  • Joseph R. Conlin. "The American Past: A Survey of American History". Chapter 27 page 457 under "VERTICAL INTEGRATION". Thompson Wadsworth. Belmont, CA, 2007.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Vertical_integration&oldid=430881761"