User talk:Shshshsh

Welcome to my talk page! Please leave a message and I will reply to you as fast as possible!:)

Chak De! India

So you don't want to accept even comments on Chak De! India? You better watch "Believe in Me (2006 film)" --Mohanavel 13:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohanavel (talk • contribs)

Andaz Apna Apna

I put citations next to Aamir Khan's name is because someone keep on switching between Aamir and Salman...So, i thought if i put citations they won't switch it...that's all...thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.222.243 (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hey, how are you doing?--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Life has been good and busy. Hardly editing these days. What are you up to these days?--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: The Playback singer problem is here again...

Re your messages: I semi-protected the article again. The user is effectively banned, so there isn't much anybody can do about that. I filed another SPI report to check for sleepers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: You're right. Sorry, I misread your message and the past protection log. I reset the protection. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: That account was picked up in the SPI sleeper check. If you ever run into any more sockpuppets, do feel free to file another SPI report. The CU are happy to sweep through these. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Lata Mangeshkar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Shshshsh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This must be a joke. The users I reverted with the rollback (Hereis the one1 (talk · contribs), Jacklion (talk · contribs), and the one whose revision still stands: Winner is Here (talk · contribs)) are the sock puppets of User:Dr.Mukesh111, who has been banned from WP and still keeps creating multiple accounts. All the socks I reverted are now blocked indefinitely. You can see the full report here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr.Mukesh111. The guy creates multiple accounts and reverts all the edits I do. You can turn to User:Gogo Dodo for further information.

I really think the blocking admin owes me an apology. He also took away my rollback rights without reviewing the case properly. This is really insulting. Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Accept reason:

My apologies, I hadn't realised there was socking going on. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

It's okay, everybody makes mistakes. Shahid • ^Talk2me 22:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

No, this is simply why we have unblock requests - so that one can explain one's actions when they are not readily visible to someone :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

LOL Shahid your turn to be blocked!! How are you amigo? Have you sene Band Baaja Baaraat?♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Nope haven't seen it, not my cup of tea, although generally I like Fincher's satirical sense of humor in his films. Yeah I think I'll go and see True Grit, much more my sort of film. A western these days too is pretty rare. What's Zinta up to these days?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Preity Zinta doesn't strike me as the typical drug addict... I've started Dobara. Want to have a joint DYK on it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:01, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Inquiry

I have gotten permission to use a publicity shot on Wikipedia but have no idea to what can I license it as. I would be very thankful if you could help me out, I uploaded it but it got removed immediately. Aryan1992 (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

WRT "Will source it today."

As you are an established contributor I was surprised at your comment diff. Re-adding unsourced personal information in this way would normally lead to warnings for non-regulars. Is there any reason that you feel that the BLP policy should not apply in this case? Thanks, Fæ (talk) 10:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar

Thank you for the barnstar! It is an honor to be receiving one from you. =) I blocked the most recent socks and filed yet another SPI to look for sleepers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Re:language scripts

Dear Shahid, I am still convinced that both Devanagari and Nastaliq scripts have a place in the article in light of my comments here. Since the two of us are very hidebound in our respective positions, I feel the best idea is to have a group of neutral administrators evaluate the issue and then draw a conclusion on it. I hope this helps. Thanks, Anupam^Talk 04:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

New message

Hey Shahid, remember how we wanted to start a discussion about adding other "notable" awards to an actor's filmography. Well, after thinking about this, I thought that this wouldn't be a good idea because it would increase the size of the article (I noticed this when I was working on Kapoor's article in my sandbox). Finally, I came up with this template as it would allow us to format an actor's wins/nominations in a proper and structured way. This is what you end up with. I am thinking of implementing this layout on other actors' award pages as well. What do you think? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

I have formatted the awards page according to how it appears on List of awards and nominations received by Alicia Keys - that was my main motivation in creating a template for actors as well. Plus it doesn't really hurt to have a "brief" introduction about the award ceremony especially for those who don't have an article of their own. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 16:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy Christmas Shahid and Rahul!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:59, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Same to you Blofeld... =) (P.S. Shahid you have written a really good intro to Preity's award page!!) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 18:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

That's what I did. Do you see any mistakes? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 20:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

What about the "critics" awards from Filmfare, Stardust, etc? Those awards don't have nominations. Would we have to include them as nominations as well? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 22:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Shahid it looks like all of the "Indiatimes" links are not working anymore and this problem has been occuring for a long time. At first I thought it was just a temporary thing but this isn't the case. :( This brings me to the question I wanted to ask you: Kapoor's article currently features a review of Chameli from Indiatimes (Subhash K Jha). Since the link doesn't work anymore, I was able to find the same review on "Glamsham.com". Do you think it would be okay if I changed it to that? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I don't know how to find the archived version of a source. Can you please help me? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 21:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks bud and BTW Happy New Year!! =) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 20:18, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Akshay Kumar

All quiet there now, semi protected for three months. If an article receives a similar amount of ip reverts then it is better to request semi protection than to keep having the article disrupted and having to constantly revert it, its a shame but if all the unconfirmed ip accounts are doing is vandalism then what to do. Many thanks for your contributions in 2010 and best wishes to you and your families and friends in 2011, and you User:BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ, happy new year. Off2riorob (talk) 20:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Excuse Me

Who are some of the most famous Bollywood Actors? Also, will you please put the answer on my talk page--76.20.52.229 (talk) 23:42, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Shania

NOOOOOOOOOooooo!!! Look how beautiful she looks though...♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

She really seems to go for German looking blokes with curly hair doesn't she!! This new bloke reminds me of Michael Ballack when he has longer curly hair. Not only is the guy stinking rich but has Shania for a wife and lives in Switzerland, one of the most scenic places on earth. So unfair!!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Cutting down on the time I spend on wikipedia and allocating more time to things I have to gain personally...♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Nothing recently. I was going to go and see The Tourist with Jolie and Depp but the reviews were awful...♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

HELP!

Please go to the talk page for Udita Goswami ASAP. I edited the article with a valid source (a real interview) and a certain person keeps changing the article to his edit with unreliable sources. It's becoming really pathetic. AyanP (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Ayan

Dear Shahid! That certain person happens to be me. Do be kind enough to check the talk page for Udita Goswami as well as the talk page for AyanP. You are sure to notice the personal attacks that he has made on me with phrases like 'fool' and 'stop pushing your agenda' in addition to mocking my home state. I am glad the guy called for your intervention, I wish to do the same and would very much wish that you intervene. I haven't been involved in an editing war ever but I am afraid this is turning into one. Happy if you could help. Killerdove 04:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerdove (talk • contribs)

Katrina Kaif

Hi amigo, when you are on line could you have a quick look at the edit request on this BLP, my Hindi consists of hello goodbye and a few other useful phrases and numbers and I definitely can't read it or tell the difference between this dialect and that one thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do provide sources

While the article contains references to awards she has won, I see nothing that supports this particular claim. [1]. Thank you for providing a source. Active Banana (^bananaphone 20:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Done. Shahid • ^Talk2me 21:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Baghban.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baghban.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Clint Eastwood

Hey buddy. This is currently going under GA review. I've condensed it down from 157kb to 86kb!! The GA reviwer said it must be below 60. I disagreed as if it is cut much below 80kb it will start to affect its comprehensiveness. Nehrams is going to do a little further cutting and imporvements later, it could still do with some copyediting. Zinta is currently 73kb so to expect Clint Eastwood who has been in films since 1954 to have an article below 60kb is a little extreme I think..♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I know, and Changeling is 121 kb and a featured article, so an article on Clint's career at 80kb is quite good I think. Well,we'll see how it goes...♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

And still Tony's grilling goes on and on. It really makes you think twice about bothering with GAs. This is easily the most fussy GA review I've ever encountered and I have over 60 of them. He expects it to be perfect and in all honesty don't think he has much experience with GA review, he's treating it virtually as an FAC. Wow google image Sarah Shahi....♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Most of his comments have been valid. But the article has near 300 references and it is way more comprehensive than most GA candidates.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Has Yellow Monkey retired? They hounded him and voted to remove his photo polls onto a sub page it seems and he has not returned since. He isn't answering his emails. What happened? Surely he is thicker skinned than that?? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

socks

Hi there. This is the second time in a month that you have marked someone that was asking me for help as a sock. First User:Taribhen and then suspected User:Rapidfire1. How do you know, how do you prove it, and how do they get blocked? What else are you working on these days? I am trying to moderate a couple of warring editors on Mallika Sherawat, but not having a great deal of success. Some people just refuse to compromise. Also, Sholay is sitting in the GA queue waiting for a reviewer to pick it up. BollyJeff || talk 02:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. If you get a minute, could you throw in your opinion on Mallika Sherawat? They say they want more editors to weigh in, but it may just be a stalling tactic. I think they just want to wear each other down. BollyJeff || talk 14:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. BTW, the recent edit to Bollywood does not seem right to me. I am thinking the source meant Cinema of India as a whole. Bollywood alone does not make over 500 films a year. Cinema of India articles says it was 235 in 2009. BollyJeff || talk 17:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Star Screen Award

No problems mate, I didn't see the awards so have no clue about it. Don't know why its not mentioned in the source but thanks for the info.--- Managerarc ^talk 19:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

IP guy

This guy keeps making massive unwanted changes under 205.242.229.70, 205.242.229.69, and maybe more. BollyJeff || talk 21:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Actually, User:Managerarc, thinks he is okay, see: User_talk:Bollyjeff#Re:_205.242.229.70 BollyJeff || talk 21:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

What is your view on

this? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Over the past several years, I have noticed that an actor's win depends on the film's performance at the box office rather than his/her work in the film. If you were to take a look at the winners of mostly all the Indian award ceremonies, you would know what I'm talking about. This would explain how Shernaz Patel's performance in Guzaarish was completely overlooked and I do agree that she deserved the award. Frankly speaking, I thought Hrithik deserved the award over SRK. As for the Best Actress award, I have not seen Ishqiya & BBB (maybe if I saw them I would change my mind but out of the other 3 nominees I do think that Kajol deserved the award). Bebo's character in G3 is similar to that of JWM so if you liked her performance there, you would like her performance in G3 as well. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Bachchan

Its not a poor source, its the page of Kayastha community.Winston786 (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Forget it, I have added this as source.Winston786 (talk) 16:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I noticed...

...you have having problems with a particular edit warrior, which you warned. Please note that he has been blocked here yet again. If you have problems again with him, please inform me or the Administrators. Thanks --SH 23:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Abhishek Bachchan

Hi there, I just reverted you edits, I have added reference which is credible ie The Telegraph India. Also if people travel from place to place for work reason that doesnt mean they change there residence daily. Whenever celebrities change there home like Abhishek Bachchan, Aishwarya Rai‎‎ etc, it get fairly enough coverage in Media. Hope this clarify the doubt, happy editing KuwarOnline ^Talk 12:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't mind as long as the sources are up-to-date and it follows the required criteria. Not that if a person was born in a place where he currently also resides, his residence need not be added. Thanks, Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:Bollywood Top-Grossing movies list

I agree with you. The copyright concern wasn't in the original AFD nomination, it was raised later only by the nominator. Now that the issue is with the copyright admins, nothing much can be done than to wait for their verdict. I don't know much about how WP:NFC works but I'm sure the page will not be deleted. --- Managerarc ^talk 07:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Shahrukh Khan or Shah Rukh Khan?

Hi. What proof do you have that his name is 2 words instead of 3? Why not add some text with a source that explains why there is the discrepancy? Otherwise you will have to keep fighting this battle. You can't just says "it is so" without some proof. BollyJeff || talk 16:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I understand what you are saying about the burden, but the issue is not old to the new people that go on WP every day. A little prose explaining the situation would go a long way I think. How can it be that the spelling of the name of possibly the world's biggest star is not clear? BollyJeff || talk 17:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I do not agree with the other guy about the text. It was bad the way he wrote it. I know that there are lots of movies, books, etc. that have it either way. All I would like to see is the same thing that you usually ask for in articles: a RELIABLE SOURCE saying that his original name is Shahrukh, and maybe why it got morphed to Shah Rukh. If that exists, please add it. Didn't it come up in the discussion that you refer to? Can you point me to that? BollyJeff || talk 17:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Emailed!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Shahid, when you have the time could you please help me find out the youngest winner and nominee for this table? Thanks :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 03:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Funny but it seems the average South Indian film article is better quality than the average Hindi film article these days, at least the older ones anyway... E.g Aarilirunthu Arubathu Varai vs Aap Beati...♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

2000s Bollywood films are far better agreed. But pre 1990 Bollywood film articles on here are as bad as some of the Malayalam/south indian cinema articles we have on here. Sadly practically nobody seems interested in older Hindi films. I would love to see some GA articles on Nargis films etc... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Excellent. Yes its sad that we can't access decent info about some of the older films. We really ought to have more Bollywood GAs. Maybe info on some films does exist in biographies of Nargis etc. Info like this. Oooohhh check out this... . ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Of course! But I am attempting to compile material to develop Mother India into a GA class article, I've begun developing a themes section. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I noticed the copyvio notice and the deleted article in the template. It seems absurd to be that figures can be copyrightable. But the argument is "they are not actual figures but estimates". Its a bit extreme, but then Moonriddengirl is very strict in regards to possible copyvios.. I will try to get Mother India up to a GA standard although production notes I doubt I will be able to access. Mughal-e-Azam also intrigues me, you like it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Yeah that can go in the themes section for critical commentary... Its getting there. I think it could make GA without production notes as they don't appear to exist. We'll see after a few days of work on it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Can you add a plot summary in a sentence or two to the intro of Mother India, just to cover what its about?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

That's fine. Mmm I did like the new poster as it really looks more like a 1950s classic film. OK no images and that later pink poster then it is..♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

After a copyedit I think Mother India is ready for GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:18, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Tell you who I like at the moment. Emily Blunt. Exactly my type, dark hair and blue eyes, classy, and a good sense of humour. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLNs69VezjI&feature=related.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

She's not "super hot" looking or anything but she's still gorgeous in my opinion. But it is her looks combined with her intelligence and personality which is exactly my type. Many "super hot women" lack qualities in the brain and personality department anyway!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Mmm Ana Vidovic or Emily Blunt....♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Colin Firth Best Actor, no surprise there.. Natalie Portman Best actress. She's very beautiful don't you think. Where did she get her looks?? Have you noticed how quite a lot of very average looking parents produce stunning looking children? Have you see Halle Berry's mother for instance? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Here No, I wouldn't describe her as good looking. But then I think her extremely short hair and glasses don't help. She's OK , but pretty average looking if you consider how stunning Halle is. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Re Madhubala images

Sorry about the re-revert. Have mentioned my reasons for wanting to change the image on the talk page. Regards. Ragasuran (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Aishwarya Rai

Hi. Still awaiting my reply to the last post that I sent to you.

Sanjay911 (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, check out the improved page of Raavanan with extra reviews added. Both the reviews and the box office are extremely positive, at least more than Guru and Jodhaa Akbar. Check each and every review, plus the box office returns of both the movies and compare it to Raavana. It is better than them, both box-offce wise and reviews-wise. Sanjay911 (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

 :Hi there, hope you are well. Still awaiting your reply to my above message. Thanks! Sanjay911 (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay thanks. She was invited by the Academy, so I added that part along with The Hindu's link and another direct video link where she herself confirms it. In the link you cited she was appreciated for her fashion sense so I added up that too.

Btw, this is kinda dumb but where is 'Raavanans talk page so that I can put forward my argument? I know, dumb. But I'm new. So please help! Thanks! :)Sanjay911 (talk) 05:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

PINQ

Hey, waiting for your adjudication on the India Quiz -- Longhairandabeard (talk) 11:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you Re Madhubala page

Shahid Hello my name is Nav and I wanted to thank you for your constant monitoring and preservation of the madhubala page i wrote a few years ago. I spent a great deal of time and effort expanding and writing the previous page which was largely inacurate and full of gossip, so your constant reverting of irrelevent and incorrect additions etc is GREATLY appreciated since i rarely have the time to do so myself. I also wrote pages on vintage actresses Nimmi and Ameeta though being less prolific than Madhubala, thier pages remain largely intact ;o) Thanks again for your efforts and defence of my entry Warm Regards Nav Navsikand (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Rekha80.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rekha80.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The image is irreplaceable because no free images showing an actor in a film can be found. The rationale clearly explains why the image adheres to WP:NONFREE and particularly its eighth caluse. Many featured articles use non-free images. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Silsila (film)

Need your help. Can you add a music section and elaborate on what I added. The says talks of a Holt song which Bachcan sings which is one of India's best known folk songs. Can you verify and improve it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Who in your view is one of the worst actresses in Hollywood. It has to be Denise Richards who is onscreen for being nothing but a pretty face. Her filmography in the last ten years says it all. Easily the worst Bond girl ever.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Is she an actress? She's a socialite who has appeared in some films, like Kim Kardashian, another talentless fame whore. Dunno, Meryl Streep and Cate Blanchett are my favourites. Judi Dench and Helen Mirren are also great.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

What do you think of Selena Gomez?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I think Selena is absolutely gorgeous, just so cute and seems a lovely girl. She's a knock out for sure but I kind of feel like a paedo about it LOL, I dunno, she's 18 but just seems very young that's all, like she was only 3 years old when I started comprehensive school!... She can certainly do better than Justin Bieber though, annoying little git.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

What do you think of Nicole Scherzinger? I think she's very hot and a nice person but I must admit at times she really looks like an ageing prostitute...♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Bonvishhp

Can you be more specific about the connection? That account's edits don't seem to be problematic as yet. Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Sounds like you'll have to open an SPI. I don't have checkuser, and even if I did something like this would require the SPI process anyway. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Congrats

Thanks. Its a pretty good feeling. After watching how User:Dr. Blofeld plowed through Mother India so quickly, I may soon be getting the hang of this thing. He uses GoogleBooks quite a bit. If you have any other advice or article writing tips for me, I am listening. I failed to get Shriya Saran to GA because the reviewer was blocking many sources as unreliable, but when they were removed there was not enough content left. I guess its a lot harder to get BLPs than films to GA. BollyJeff || talk 20:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Look at the GA section in the talk page. There were many other sources that were rejected, and removed, but not the ones that you mentioned, except Idlebrain and behindwoods.com. I kept the ones I did only because they were just for awards. BollyJeff || talk 21:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

It would make a massive difference if you could both add some google book references to articles like Andaz (1971 film). Even 2 or 3 references makes a big difference to unsourced.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC) Excellent. A goal might be to get some book references into all of the films listed in the top Bollywood list. The original list can be accessed from before it was marked as "copyright". I'll definitely give a helping hand.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

i want to award u a barnstar

hey i want to award u a barnstar and i will .i am impressed with preity zinta article.keep it up.You and ranbirk are truely amazing guys.

The Modest Barnstar

		The Modest Barnstar
		You have done amazing work to most of the articles on wikipedia. Thank you and hope you will continue to do all these. Wallvelvet (talk) 17:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Playback singer

Re your message: I filed an SPI report about it to confirm the accounts and look for the usual sleepers. You're probably right that it is him. Looks the same to me. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Re your message: Reprotecting the page is in order since the old protection expired. I reset it for another six months. That will help with that article, but will not help with his other habit of undoing all of your edits. I filed another SPI report for the new account. If you find any more accounts, do report them to SPI as there always seems to be sleepers that are found. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Re your message: The CU came back really fast and picked up three additional accounts: One already used and two that had not. Do feel free to file an SPI report as soon as you see any other socks. Waiting for me to file it will just allow him to get in more edits. The SPI form makes it easy to file a new report. Just make sure you request a checkuser on the report. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Question

Is there a way to send another Wikipedian a private message that does not show up here? BollyJeff || talk 00:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Shshshsh. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Liz

Hello friend. To be honest she was one of the few old Hollywood stars I never liked. Too much of a diva, and eight husbands says it all!!! I can't believe though she was younger than Clint Eastwood! I've been playing the following on the piano. see this. B flat minor, B flat diminished, E flat minor, B flat minor G flat major, F 7 etc. Genius.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

LOL Shirley Maclaine was one of the few I didn't like either!! Great actress but a hard nosed bitch. She's one of the few female co-stars that Clint Eastwood didn't try to seduce. Both he and Don Siegel said she was harder than most men!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

She is supposed to be quite a difficult person I think. Her article really ought to be much better than it is, but then again most old Hollywood greats have lousy articles on here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Its hard to think that Clint Eastwood was older than both liz and James Dean. I mean James Dean and Liz Taylor had accomplished so much by only 24, Eastwood didn't even have his first audition until that age. He only really became super famous in the mid 1960s.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey there bud... How are you doing? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Not too bad... a bit busy though. What about you? Have you seen any new movies recently? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I only saw NOKJ and I actually liked it. All I can say is that Ms. Mukerji finally learnt that working with YRF won't get you anywhere. LOL :) BTW this is so pathetic! Does it remind you of anything? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks :) BTW have you managed to catch a glimpse of Preity's new TV show? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:55, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

You may wish to read my new articles A Berlin Romance and Martin Miller (Czech actor), both with reference to old Hollywood.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks buddy. Can you help with addressing Talk:Mother India/GA1?♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Mother India passed GA with flying colours... See this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I have nothing to say... -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 18:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Well I wanted to show you that it is possible to write good articles on such old films.. Its a site called Qwiki. It used wikipedia text and displays it as a sort of media portfolio with it spoken and some nice pictures. Users can submit links on youtube and photos which can be used to illustrate it. E.g Preity Zinta clips on youtube can be recommended.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:09, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Which film do you want improved to GA next?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:12, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I think I can get Dil Se up to a B class status. But GA, I doubt the critical coverage of it is all that substantial in books... I'll look into it over the next few days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Gorgeous. Man would I love to ride that motorbike down the Italian coast with that chick on the back.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Yeah she's hot alright. Check your email I've posted something about Aishwarya which will definitely interest you.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Will resume with Dil Se tomorrow, Can you condense/improve the quality of the plot for me and then I'll resume writing it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Tell you who I think is hotter than Jolie. Krista Allen. I think she is one of the sexiest I've ever seen. See this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Shahid. Not your cup of tea? Dil Se is proving to be difficult, not sure I can find enough decent material to get beyond B. It has at least improved though!..♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

You see this?. Prepared for GA and nominated. Not only completely reverted, my GA nomination reverted and page locked to prevent my version going through and being promoted because Giano is more important that wikipedia's GA and FA content. Seem right to you? Is this a complete miscarriage of justice and a perfect example of the mess wikipedia administration is in with such extreme double standards?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

reply

Sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. This was mainly aimed at Bollywooddreamz because he reverted an edit that was exactly liked one of yours and then ridiculed the guy for it. It leaves me (and I am sure other outside observers) wondering why its okay in one place and not in the other. It seems to me that for consistency sake, the articles should be treated the same. If you really believed that your edit on Priyanka was right, then I would think that you should agree with what the other guy did on Kareena, and not take 'Dreamz side. Likewise, if you think the way it is on Kareena is okay, then put it back that way on Priyanka too. I would really like to see it the same way on both articles. Otherwise I am left wondering how to write up these things on other articles that I might edit. But please don't take offense; things often come off more harsh in writing than in speech. You know that we are friends on here. BollyJeff || talk 01:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Now after writing all of this, I see that he has already changed it :-) BollyJeff || talk 01:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

India Quiz

Please post a question and keep the quiz moving..You have removed my question also, how can i use it later? Prasad (talk) 07:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Amondal is not posting a question, can you pl. post my earlier deleted question ?? Prasad (talk) 06:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Ranveer Singh

Can you add some info bout Ranveer's second film in his article? Im kinda doomed at editing because of my accident. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Checked Rekha page off late?

Hey, I have been seeing you building and maintaining Rekha page too selflessly since quite long, I hope my humble contribution helps. Fanofbollywood (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Yup that got ugly with her PR interfering a lot, anyway I have told all my photographers to be on a lookout, hopefully I'll get one soon. Fanofbollywood (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, just came to knw about you. Even am interested in expanding articles like Amitabh Bachchan, Rekha, Hema Malini and Aishwarya Rai. I can contribute the best to my level. --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 11:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Feedback

Hello Shahid, I created this article Kamla_(film), though its childish to ask for feedback, but kind of put in a lot of time that's why would appreciate your feedback. Fanofbollywood (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.Fanofbollywood (talk) 06:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

PC sig

What are your views on this issue? And how can you provide a source for a signature? BollyJeff || talk 12:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Amigo

Hola amigo. How are you? Having fun? Chao !!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

The recent edits on Mukerji's page is pathetic... -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 18:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

An ANI opened about me for creating stubs like Dara-I-Pech, Mano Gai, ‎ Baladay and Asqalan, Afghanistan... They will always be notable whether short or long.. This is a wiki, people seem to be blind to the fact that short new articles can be expanded... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

LOL.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I am doing well. What about you? (P.S. Do you really think that it is really "him"?) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 18:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Over the past several months, I only managed to catch NOKJ & Patiala House - the latter proves what Kumar can actually do if he stops doing these "mindless" comedies. What about you? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

I have been a fan of Vidya since she made her debut with Parineeta; she reminds me of the yestyear actresses. Anushka Sharma is another actress that I am growing fond of. As for the actors, I like Pratik Babbar and Ranbir Kapoor. Ranveer Singh isn't that bad either... though I have to see what else he does with his new-found success. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry but I completely disagree with the SRK intro. Tom Cruise, Will Smith, Brad Pitt etc we do not claim them to be "one of the world's biggest movie stars" even though they are. To me a westerner it seems extremely out of place to claim he is one of the world biggest movie stars when the fact is the vast majority have not even heard of him in the UK and Europe. Seriously if I did a survey Who is Shadrukh Khan? to my home town out of 50,000, 49,000 at least would not have heard of him. This is why you must clarify that he he is perhaps the biggest movie star in Asia with massive populations but not as well known in Europe. Sorry mate but he really isn'y well known in UK and Europe even though I believe they made a Madame Tussauds one of him for the British Indians. This is why it looks out of place. Either accept my change or remove the claim please. The current version looks highly Indian-centric and not a genuine reflection of the truth. He is far from being one of the biggest movie stars in Europe, North and South America. The claim is indeed true if you account for Asian populations and diaspora compared to the overall world population but that's because there is a disproportionate number of Asians in the world to other continents. It needs to be clarified. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Reworded slightly which I think addresses my concern.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, but I do hope you can see what I mean.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Would be nice to get his article up to GA of course... Thing is a lot of people don't know he is one of the biggest movie stars in the world! I think its OK to say so as long as it implies that it means overall, which I think the current version makes clear... Anyway I think this coming week I'll draft up an improved version in my user space and then we can copy edit it and hopefully promote to GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

FYI

I have written an Edit Filter in an attempt to help with the sock that keeps following you. I can't tell you how it works, but hopefully it will help a little. The filter is currently set in a log only mode in order to check its effectiveness. I know that he is not around every day, but if you spot him over the next couple of days, can you leave me a note so I can check to see if the filter would have caught him? Or you can file another SPI report as I'm watching that page. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

It seems that he has disappeared? At least for a little while. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Re your message: You're probably right. =) The filter got disabled for now, but I can always re-enable it should he reappear. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

...

LOL. An obituary, now that's a first. Any articles on the go Shahid? Chao!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

infobox question

Why make this edit to put Jaya on top? Look whose pictures are on the cover; not hers. Nothing in here to indicate who should be first. BollyJeff || talk 21:08, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Well, AB is on the cover of KANK, so he belongs there. My take is whoever is on the poster/DVD cover are the major actors that should go in the infobox, or at least be at the top of the list. BollyJeff || talk 21:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

If not the poster, then I think whoever has the leading roles, or most screen time, should determine the order, not acting seniority, unless the screen time is similar. On Sholay, I think other people chose the order, why? In this case, I understand that Dharmendra was the bigger star at the time, which is why he is first. BollyJeff || talk 23:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Re

Hey buddy, I am doing fine. Its just that over the past several months I have noticed that a lot of links are dying and I am unable to find a replacement of them or sometimes even an archived version of a source that already died. Just as a precautionary measure, I thought it would be good if we archived sources while they were stil working... something that I thought of while going through the article of Taare Zameen Par. If you take a look at Zinta's article, there are a lot of dead links now and an archived version of these sources can't be found anymore. (P.S. BTW how do you check the size of the article?) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:06, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

So you're telling me that if the "original" link dies (even after finding an archived version of it), the archived version won't work on WP anymore? As for the size of the article, I'm talking about finding out its length. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

I now understand what you are saying. Thanks for letting me know about that. I thought that an archived version would continue working even though if the original version was dead. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Someday we will get SRK up to GA and Kareena to FA right? Ciao!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh that, well, its certainly keeping me busy!! Haven't been to he cinema recently, you?♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

WHich ones?♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Check out Little black Givenchy dress of Audrey Hepburn and Green Versace "jungle" dress of Jennifer Lopez.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps if I started a dress of Bette Davis's you'd like it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Just a bit of fun. I'd start a dress of Rekha's if I had the sources. Can you think of any iconic Rekha dress? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chirag69.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chirag69.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Ness Wadia

"No, sorry, it's not done. Wikipedia uses internal wikilinks, not external links in the text." Oh my bad, didnt know that. Yea, never seen external links in the text anywhere else. Apologies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prashantserai (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Udit Narayan

Hi, I thought Udit Narayan was originally from Nepal and not India, but on here (wiki) it is written India. I also read some facts about Udit and there it was stated he was born in Nepal. Now, i am in doubt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torreslfchero (talk • contribs) 09:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikiproject Films to my article talk page.

Hello there. Is it ok to add the Wiki project movies to my article talk page?--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 01:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

You are winner of the Portal India Quiz Round 37!

This user was the winner of Round 37 of the India Quiz.

Congratulations!

Awards format

Hey there buddy!! I noticed that you were also interested in adding nominations to other award ceremonies apart from Filmfare. For that reason, I decided to format the Apsara Awards like that too. However, do you actually know a site that has all the previous nominations from the previous years? Filmfare is done. Apsara and Star Screen is still going on. IIFA, Zee Cine and Stardust are left. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 04:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

N. T. Rama Rao

Hi. Can you put this on your watchlist. I think the 33 political point thing is too tedious reading to be suitable. Maybe it could be broken down into proper prose I don't know, but the ip keeps reverting it. But its extremely difficult to read in the ip version plus it is against MOS to have a filmography in the centre of the article. I disagree with the point section, we do not need to know every single policy of his ever do we?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actor

Hi there. Can you please show me where in the official website the list of all past nominations is (especially those since 2005)? I must be missing the obvious link. --Muhandes (talk) 12:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Hola

Hola amigo!! Ohhh NOOOOO. Such a major loss to the project. LOL.. Stop your POVVVV Arrrraaaggaahahaagghh. O LOL I thought you said Sarvagnya!! Couldn't care less about him, wikipedia is better off without snotty-nosed tyrants... The film project is now run by much better individuals, even if I still have nothing to do with it. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

filmfare

Yeah, that looks good. Question: why does the documentary one not have 'critics' in the title? Is it really a critics award? Also, do you have any desire to contribute an opinion to the ongoing struggle with box office #s for Enthiran? I placed a question to various projects and to Talk:Enthiran itself asking for other opinions. Someone "new" came along and changed the figures and the article got locked with their edits in place. BollyJeff || talk 23:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

filmfare Debut Awards

Please use the Box itself, because it is more arranged and perfect. The already added years are wrong as well. The years which I updated is right. For exapmple, QSQT was released in 1988, so award was given for 1988 only, not for 1989. Similarly Maine pyar kiya was released in 1989, so award was given for 1989 only, not for 1990. Moreover, Salman Khan was never given Best Debut award in 1989, instead it was given to sooraj Barjatya. Filmfare said that, Salman has already acted in Beevi ho To aisi, so "debut" award cannot be given, but they intentionally forgot that, Aamir Khan, winner for 1988 has already acted in Holi before QSQT. Anyhow Filmfare understood their mistake and awarded salman the trophy after 10 years. Rajeshbieee (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Modelling, acting, business (IPL), television and now production - Zinta has done it all. We need to update her article pronto... -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Re Hema Malini

Hi! can you just expand her "career" section. It's too short for someone who has acted in 150 plus movies. Thanks! --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 07:32, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Aishwarya Rai

Hi friend. I will look into this later as its at GAC and I think it needs a bit of work. Everything good I hope. Ciao!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, Dil Se will be tough though.. Wow have a look at some of the images of West Chinnock and see it on google street view. Its such a gorgeous part of the country, I adore rural Somerset, Devon, Cornwall and Dorset. Its like stepping into a Famous Five novel!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Enthiran

Enthiran page is being owned by hard-core Rajinikanth fans User:Vensatry, User:Bollyjeff and User:Eelamstylez77. They have a conflict of interest in keeping this article neutral. They claim Enthiran is the highest grosser in India (not Sholay and 3 Idiots).

The neutral version is this. Taran Adarash even gives break up. Please help protect wikipedia from such vandalising criminals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kollyfan (talk • contribs) 16:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Ash GANs

It pains me to see the article failing so many times, and I would like it to be improved in the same way as I do for other articles. Can I count on you to help me out in this respect? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)