Wikipedia:Peer review/Mount Cleveland (Alaska)/archive2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
cmt |
+ |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*I think it's always useful to research a bit more. Have you consulted all of the resources [http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1101-24-&volpage=sources here]? '''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#4682B4" face="Optima">ceran</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#4682B4" face="Optima">''thor''</font>]] 14:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC) |
*I think it's always useful to research a bit more. Have you consulted all of the resources [http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1101-24-&volpage=sources here]? '''[[User:Ceranthor|<font color="#4682B4" face="Optima">ceran</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Ceranthor|<font color="#4682B4" face="Optima">''thor''</font>]] 14:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
::All the ones that are accessible, yeah. The problem with Cleveland is that there's tons of sources, but none are very detailed, most just gloss over Cleveland with passing reference. Still, many of them contain short little unique bits, and it's from that that the article is structured. I don't remember exactly, but I think I talked to Awk and he got me some of the material in there, but it turned out to be nothing new. <span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><b><font color="#333">[[User:Resident Mario|Res]]</font></b><font color="#444">[[User_talk:Resident_Mario#top|Mar]]</font></span> 16:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:56, 30 June 2011
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because it failed an FAC fairly recently. That experience taught me that over-prepared is still not prepared enough; hence, I'm listing the article for review here as a step towards renominating it and, hopefully, passing this time. ;) ResMar 04:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- I think it's always useful to research a bit more. Have you consulted all of the resources here? ceranthor 14:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- All the ones that are accessible, yeah. The problem with Cleveland is that there's tons of sources, but none are very detailed, most just gloss over Cleveland with passing reference. Still, many of them contain short little unique bits, and it's from that that the article is structured. I don't remember exactly, but I think I talked to Awk and he got me some of the material in there, but it turned out to be nothing new. ResMar 16:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)