Jump to content

Talk:2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 47: Line 47:
*I smiled when I saw the move. It seems to me that the Germans caused this outbreak through bad practices and stupidity, and are still unwilling to pay for the damage. Making a move without discussion is part of the [[WP:BRD]] credo. [[User:Speciate|Speciate]] ([[User talk:Speciate|talk]]) 19:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
*I smiled when I saw the move. It seems to me that the Germans caused this outbreak through bad practices and stupidity, and are still unwilling to pay for the damage. Making a move without discussion is part of the [[WP:BRD]] credo. [[User:Speciate|Speciate]] ([[User talk:Speciate|talk]]) 19:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


"German" is incorrect--this strain has also caused an outbreak in France and it will probably turn up in other countries. If the source is Egyptian fenugreek seeds as tentatively reported<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-13973002</ref> then there is nothing particularly German about it. Germans just got it first. Just stick with the technical name without political baggage. [[User:Skmacksler|Skmacksler]] ([[User talk:Skmacksler|talk]]) 15:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
*"German" is incorrect--this strain has also caused an outbreak in France and it will probably turn up in other countries. If the source is Egyptian fenugreek seeds as tentatively reported[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-13973002] then there is nothing particularly German about it. Germans just got it first. Just stick with the technical name without political baggage. [[User:Skmacksler|Skmacksler]] ([[User talk:Skmacksler|talk]]) 15:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


== French outbreak and Swedish case ==
== French outbreak and Swedish case ==

Revision as of 19:18, 30 June 2011

  • Archives

Talk:2011 E. coli O104:H4 outbreak/Archives/2011/June

Reference to E. coli strain being engineered

There are now references to the possibility of this outbreak being man-made in multiple third party sources e.g. [1], [2], [3]. I recognise that this is likely to be highly controversial and therefore wanted to discuss the issue here rather than simply add a mention to the article, but in my view some mention of these reports should be made in this article. I am personally neutral as to which section the reference goes into. Rangoon11 (talk) 16:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unreliable sources written by people who don't understand evolution. Livestock are given antibiotics, and so it is inevitable that resistant strains will florish. Speciate (talk) 19:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How are these sources unreliable? So far as I can see they all more than satisfy WP requirements.Rangoon11 (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because they are crazy Russkies advancing a moronic position. Every time I see a news story by RT or Pravda I wonder what they have been smoking, especially when they stray outside of politics. Speciate (talk) 20:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's your opinion and of course you're welcome to it but I don't see how it fits in with WP policy. Rangoon11 (talk) 20:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title change without discussion

An anonymous editor changed the display title in this edit without explanation. I found no prior discussion about this in the talk archives. Another editor subsequently moved the article to a name matching the display title, again without discussion.

Is there a consensus for the title 2011 German E. coli O104:H4 outbreak ? I feel that title is clunky and the inclusion of "German" is unnecessary. Seeing as the change and move was without discussion I propose reverting back to the original name. I would prefer if in future such moves were done following the expected wikipedia processes. -84user (talk) 13:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"German" in the title is incorrect and misleading as the strain has also caused an outbreak in France and will probably turn up in other countries. Skmacksler (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

2011 German E. coli O104:H4 outbreak2011 E. coli O104:H4 outbreak – My rationale is simply to return the name to what it was, and to undo a change made with no discussion. Editors can of course suggest other names for this article. 84user (talk) 13:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I smiled when I saw the move. It seems to me that the Germans caused this outbreak through bad practices and stupidity, and are still unwilling to pay for the damage. Making a move without discussion is part of the WP:BRD credo. Speciate (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "German" is incorrect--this strain has also caused an outbreak in France and it will probably turn up in other countries. If the source is Egyptian fenugreek seeds as tentatively reported[4] then there is nothing particularly German about it. Germans just got it first. Just stick with the technical name without political baggage. Skmacksler (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

French outbreak and Swedish case

There's a report about ~10 persons getting infected with 0104:H4 in France. And 1 person getting HUS? by infection in Sweden. Could someone dig into this? esp when, where, strain, effects.Electron9 (talk) 01:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]