Talk:2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak: Difference between revisions
Skmacksler (talk | contribs) |
m →Requested move: format |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
*I smiled when I saw the move. It seems to me that the Germans caused this outbreak through bad practices and stupidity, and are still unwilling to pay for the damage. Making a move without discussion is part of the [[WP:BRD]] credo. [[User:Speciate|Speciate]] ([[User talk:Speciate|talk]]) 19:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
*I smiled when I saw the move. It seems to me that the Germans caused this outbreak through bad practices and stupidity, and are still unwilling to pay for the damage. Making a move without discussion is part of the [[WP:BRD]] credo. [[User:Speciate|Speciate]] ([[User talk:Speciate|talk]]) 19:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
"German" is incorrect--this strain has also caused an outbreak in France and it will probably turn up in other countries. If the source is Egyptian fenugreek seeds as tentatively reported |
*"German" is incorrect--this strain has also caused an outbreak in France and it will probably turn up in other countries. If the source is Egyptian fenugreek seeds as tentatively reported[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-13973002] then there is nothing particularly German about it. Germans just got it first. Just stick with the technical name without political baggage. [[User:Skmacksler|Skmacksler]] ([[User talk:Skmacksler|talk]]) 15:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
== French outbreak and Swedish case == |
== French outbreak and Swedish case == |
Revision as of 19:18, 30 June 2011
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A news item involving 2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 31 May 2011. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
- Archives
Talk:2011 E. coli O104:H4 outbreak/Archives/2011/June
Reference to E. coli strain being engineered
There are now references to the possibility of this outbreak being man-made in multiple third party sources e.g. [1], [2], [3]. I recognise that this is likely to be highly controversial and therefore wanted to discuss the issue here rather than simply add a mention to the article, but in my view some mention of these reports should be made in this article. I am personally neutral as to which section the reference goes into. Rangoon11 (talk) 16:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Unreliable sources written by people who don't understand evolution. Livestock are given antibiotics, and so it is inevitable that resistant strains will florish. Speciate (talk) 19:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- How are these sources unreliable? So far as I can see they all more than satisfy WP requirements.Rangoon11 (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Because they are crazy Russkies advancing a moronic position. Every time I see a news story by RT or Pravda I wonder what they have been smoking, especially when they stray outside of politics. Speciate (talk) 20:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- That's your opinion and of course you're welcome to it but I don't see how it fits in with WP policy. Rangoon11 (talk) 20:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Because they are crazy Russkies advancing a moronic position. Every time I see a news story by RT or Pravda I wonder what they have been smoking, especially when they stray outside of politics. Speciate (talk) 20:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- How are these sources unreliable? So far as I can see they all more than satisfy WP requirements.Rangoon11 (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Title change without discussion
An anonymous editor changed the display title in this edit without explanation. I found no prior discussion about this in the talk archives. Another editor subsequently moved the article to a name matching the display title, again without discussion.
Is there a consensus for the title 2011 German E. coli O104:H4 outbreak ? I feel that title is clunky and the inclusion of "German" is unnecessary. Seeing as the change and move was without discussion I propose reverting back to the original name. I would prefer if in future such moves were done following the expected wikipedia processes. -84user (talk) 13:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
"German" in the title is incorrect and misleading as the strain has also caused an outbreak in France and will probably turn up in other countries. Skmacksler (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
It has been proposed in this section that 2011 Germany E. coli O104:H4 outbreak be renamed and moved to 2011 E. coli O104:H4 outbreak. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
2011 German E. coli O104:H4 outbreak → 2011 E. coli O104:H4 outbreak – My rationale is simply to return the name to what it was, and to undo a change made with no discussion. Editors can of course suggest other names for this article. 84user (talk) 13:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- I smiled when I saw the move. It seems to me that the Germans caused this outbreak through bad practices and stupidity, and are still unwilling to pay for the damage. Making a move without discussion is part of the WP:BRD credo. Speciate (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- "German" is incorrect--this strain has also caused an outbreak in France and it will probably turn up in other countries. If the source is Egyptian fenugreek seeds as tentatively reported[4] then there is nothing particularly German about it. Germans just got it first. Just stick with the technical name without political baggage. Skmacksler (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
French outbreak and Swedish case
There's a report about ~10 persons getting infected with 0104:H4 in France. And 1 person getting HUS? by infection in Sweden. Could someone dig into this? esp when, where, strain, effects.Electron9 (talk) 01:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class Europe articles
- Low-importance Europe articles
- WikiProject Europe articles
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Mid-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- B-Class Agriculture articles
- High-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- B-Class Microbiology articles
- Low-importance Microbiology articles
- WikiProject Microbiology articles
- Unassessed Disaster management articles
- Unknown-importance Disaster management articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- Requested moves