User talk:Spalds: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:Spalds/Archive 1. |
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Right Stuff: October 2011: new section |
||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
I think everyone over at WP:LDS will agree with me that this is overdue! – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]] <sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 06:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
I think everyone over at WP:LDS will agree with me that this is overdue! – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]] <sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 06:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
== ''The Right Stuff:'' October 2011 == |
|||
<!-- HEADER --> |
|||
<div style="background-color:#FFFACD;"> <!--:#FFFACD #FFF--> |
|||
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:15px 30px;"><div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:7px;">[[File:The right stuff.png|center|270px|alt=The Right Stuff|link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News/September 2011]]</div> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:100%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; text-align:center;"><span style="white-space:nowrap; line-height:120%; font-size:155%; color:#333;">October 2011<br /></span></div></div> |
|||
<div style="padding-left:4px; padding-right:4px;"> |
|||
<!-- LEFT PANEL --> |
|||
<div style="float:left; width:49%; "> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">INTERVIEW<br /></div> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:190%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">An Interview with Dank<br /></div> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 85%;"> |
|||
By [[user:Lionelt|Lionelt]]<br><br> |
|||
[[File:US-O12 insignia.svg|right|75px]] |
|||
''The Right Stuff'' caught up with [[user:Dank|Dank]], the recently elected Lead Coordinator of [[WP:MILHIST|WikiProject Military History]]. MILHIST is considered by many to be one of the most successful projects in the English Wikipedia. |
|||
'''Q: Tell us a little about yourself.'''<br> |
|||
'''A''': I'm Dan, a Wikipedian since 2007, from North Carolina. I started out with an interest in history, robotics, style guidelines, and copyediting. These days, I'm the lead coordinator for the Military History Project and a reviewer of Featured Article Candidates. I've been an administrator and maintained [[WP:Update]], a summary of policy changes, since 2008. |
|||
'''Q: What is your experience with WikiProjects?'''<br> |
|||
'''A''': I guess I'm most familiar with [[WP:MILHIST]] and [[WP:SHIPS]], and I'm trying to get up to speed at [[WP:AVIATION]]. I've probably talked with members of most of the wikiprojects at one time or another. |
|||
'''Q: What makes a WikiProject successful?'''<br> |
|||
'''A''': A lot of occasional contributors who think of the project as fun rather than work, a fair number of people willing to write or review articles, a small core of like-minded people who are dedicated to building and maintaining the project, and access to at least a few people who are familiar with reviewing standards and with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. |
|||
'''Q: Do you have any tips for increasing membership?'''<br> |
|||
'''A''': Aim for a consistent, helpful and professional image. Let people know what the project is doing and what they could be doing, but don't push. |
|||
</div></div> |
|||
<!-- RIGHT PANEL --> |
|||
<div style="float:right; width:49%;"> |
|||
<br><br><br><br> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 85%;"> |
|||
If you've got a core group interested in building a wikiproject, it helps if they do more listening than talking at first ... find out what people are trying to do, and offer them help with whatever it is. Some wikiprojects build membership by helping people get articles through the review processes. |
|||
</div> |
|||
----- |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">[[File:UK Pro-life demonstrators.jpg|right|180px]] |
|||
DISCUSSION REPORT<br /></div> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:190%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Abortion Case Plods Along<br /></div> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 85%;"> |
|||
By [[user:Lionelt|Lionelt]]<br><br> |
|||
The arbitration request submitted by [[user:Steven Zhang|Steven Zhang]] moved into its second month. The case, which evaluates user conduct, arose from contentious discussions regarding the naming of the [[Pro-life]] and [[Pro-choice]] articles, and a related issue pertaining to the inclusion of "death" in the lede of [[Abortion]]. A number of members are involved. On the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion/Evidence|Evidence]] page [[user:ArtifexMayhem|ArtifexMahem]] posted a table indicating that [[user:DMSBel|DMSBel]] made the most edits to the Abortion article. DMSBel has announced their semi-retirement. Fact finding regarding individual editor behavior has begun in earnest on the[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion/Workshop|Workshop]] page. |
|||
<p> |
|||
Last month it was [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_76#Dispute_resolution_noticeboard_-_Stage_2|decided]] that due to the success of the new [[WP:DRN|Dispute Resolution Noticeboard]] the [[WP:CNB|Content Noticeboard]] would be shut down. [[WP:WQA|Wikiquette Assistance]] will remain active. The DRN is primarily intended to resolve content disputes. |
|||
</div></div> |
|||
<!-- BOTTOM PANEL --> |
|||
<div style="clear:both; width:100%;"> |
|||
----- |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">PROJECT NEWS<br /></div> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:190%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Article Incubator Launched<br /></div> |
|||
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 85%;"> |
|||
By [[user:Lionelt|Lionelt]]<br><br> |
|||
Was your article deleted in spite of your best efforts to save it? You should consider having a copy [[WP:REFUND|restored]] to the [[WP:RIGHT/I|Incubator]] where project members can help improve it. Upon meeting content criteria, articles are graduated to mainspace. The Incubator is also ideal for collaborating on new article drafts. [[wp:WikiProject Conservatism/Incubator/Star Parker|Star Parker]] is the first addition to the incubator. The article was deleted per WP:POLITICIAN. |
|||
[[file:Wiki-commons.png|95px|right]]<p> |
|||
WikiProject Conservatism is expanding. We now have a [[commons:commons:WikiProject Conservatism|satellite on Commons]]. Any help in categorizing images or in getting the fledgling project off the ground is appreciated.<p> |
|||
We have a few new members who joined the project in September. Please give a hearty welcome to [[user:Conservative Philosopher|Conservative Philosopher]], [[user:Screwball23|Screwball23]] and [[user:Regushee|Regushee]] by showing them some [[WP:Wikilove|Wikilove]]. Screwball23 has been on WikiPedia for five years and has made major improvements to [[Linda McMahon]]. Regushee is not one for idle chit chat: an amazing 93% of their edits are in article space. |
|||
</div></div> |
|||
<!-- FOOTER --> |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- FOOTER --> |
|||
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:3px;"> |
|||
{| style="background:none; clear:both; text-align:center; font-size:90%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; color:#444; width:100%;" |
|||
| width="14%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism|Project]] |
|||
| width="14%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[P:RIGHT|Portal]] |
|||
| width="14%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/About us|Join]] |
|||
| width="14%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News#Archives|Archives]] |
|||
| width="14%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/News|Newsroom]] |
|||
| width="14%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism/News#Subscriptions|Subscribe]] |
|||
| width="14%" style="padding-top:3px;" | [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Conservatism/News|Suggestions]] |
|||
|}</div></div><br/> |
|||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0194 --> |
Revision as of 06:09, 1 November 2011
This is Spalds's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 2 days |
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Template:LDSproject
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement#Template:LDSproject. 208.81.184.4 (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}})
- Thanks, I'll keep an eye on the discussion and add comments if necessary. Regards, Spalds (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism broadly construed. – Lionel (talk) 05:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC) |
Rob Bishop Changes
Thanks for looking over the Rob Bishop page. Your changes are fine, however there were two paragraphs deleted that I have since re-sourced and inserted back into the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snyderut1847 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- I made a change to your change which kept the same meaning, but removed some of the more (in my opinion) anti-Bishop sentiments. Also, if you could find a source besides thinkprogress.org (a progressive left-leaning website), it would be great. I kept it in there because the video speaks for itself, but I'd rather have the "review" of the video done by a newspaper or similar entity. Thanks for your help, Spalds (talk) 03:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I understand the importance of keeping the neutral point of view so I made some slight tweaks that retain that, however don't overlook any facts.
- So far so good, but I think that changing the source from thinkprogress.org to WSJ is counter-productive to the reader, as no real information is available from the WSJ site, except for the link to thinkprogress.org Spalds (talk) 23:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I understand the importance of keeping the neutral point of view so I made some slight tweaks that retain that, however don't overlook any facts.
[[Image:Template:LogoCon|right|80px]]
Welcome to WikiProject Conservatism! We are a growing community of editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles related to conservatism. Here's how you can get involved:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! |
Policy
Please see Talk:Rob Bishop#Policy. Will Beback talk 00:41, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
The Right Stuff: September 2011
By Lionelt
Welcome to the inaugural issue of The Right Stuff, the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. The Project has developed at a breakneck speed since it was created on February 12, 2011 with the edit summary, "Let's roll!" With over 50 members the need for a project newsletter is enormous. With over 3000 articles to watch, an active talk page and numerous critical discussions spread over various noticeboards, it has become increasingly difficult to manage the information overload. The goal of The Right Stuff is to help you keep up with the changing landscape.
The Right Stuff is a newsletter consisting of original reporting. Writers will use a byline to "sign" their contributions. Just as with The Signpost, "guidelines such as 'no ownership of articles', and particularly 'no original research', will not necessarily apply."
WikiProject Conservatism has a bright future ahead: this newsletter will allow us tell the story. All that's left to say is: "Let's roll!"
By Lionelt
A new style guide to help standardize editing was rolled out. It focuses on concepts, people and organizations from a conservatism perspective. The guide features detailed article layouts for several types of articles. You can help improve it here. The Project's Article Collaboration currently has two nominations, but they don't appear to be generating much interest. You can get involved with the Collaboration here.
I am pleased to report that we have two new members: Rjensen and Soonersfan168. Rjensen is a professional historian and has access to JSTOR. Soonersfan168 says he is a "young conservative who desires to improve Wikipedia!" Unfortunately we will be seeing less of Geofferybard, as he has announced his semi-retirement. We wish him well. Be sure to stop by their talk pages and drop off some Wikilove.
By Lionelt
On August 3rd Peter Oborne, a British journalist, became the Project's 3,000th tagged article. It is a tribute to the membership that we have come this far this quickly. The latest Featured Article is Richard Nixon. Our congratulations to Wehwalt for a job well done. The article with the most page views was Rick Perry with 887,389 views, not surprising considering he announced he was running for president on August 11th. Follwing Perry were Michele Bachmann and Tea Party movement. The Project was ranked 75th based on total edits, which is up from 105th in July. The article with the most edits was Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2012 with 374 edits. An RFC regarding candidate inclusion criteria generated much interest on the talk page.
Great work!
The Morning Star Award | ||
Awarded for your tireless efforts on behalf of WikiProject LDS. – Lionel (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
I think everyone over at WP:LDS will agree with me that this is overdue! – Lionel (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
The Right Stuff: October 2011
By Lionelt
The Right Stuff caught up with Dank, the recently elected Lead Coordinator of WikiProject Military History. MILHIST is considered by many to be one of the most successful projects in the English Wikipedia.
Q: Tell us a little about yourself.
A: I'm Dan, a Wikipedian since 2007, from North Carolina. I started out with an interest in history, robotics, style guidelines, and copyediting. These days, I'm the lead coordinator for the Military History Project and a reviewer of Featured Article Candidates. I've been an administrator and maintained WP:Update, a summary of policy changes, since 2008.
Q: What is your experience with WikiProjects?
A: I guess I'm most familiar with WP:MILHIST and WP:SHIPS, and I'm trying to get up to speed at WP:AVIATION. I've probably talked with members of most of the wikiprojects at one time or another.
Q: What makes a WikiProject successful?
A: A lot of occasional contributors who think of the project as fun rather than work, a fair number of people willing to write or review articles, a small core of like-minded people who are dedicated to building and maintaining the project, and access to at least a few people who are familiar with reviewing standards and with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
Q: Do you have any tips for increasing membership?
A: Aim for a consistent, helpful and professional image. Let people know what the project is doing and what they could be doing, but don't push.
If you've got a core group interested in building a wikiproject, it helps if they do more listening than talking at first ... find out what people are trying to do, and offer them help with whatever it is. Some wikiprojects build membership by helping people get articles through the review processes.
By Lionelt
The arbitration request submitted by Steven Zhang moved into its second month. The case, which evaluates user conduct, arose from contentious discussions regarding the naming of the Pro-life and Pro-choice articles, and a related issue pertaining to the inclusion of "death" in the lede of Abortion. A number of members are involved. On the Evidence page ArtifexMahem posted a table indicating that DMSBel made the most edits to the Abortion article. DMSBel has announced their semi-retirement. Fact finding regarding individual editor behavior has begun in earnest on theWorkshop page.
Last month it was decided that due to the success of the new Dispute Resolution Noticeboard the Content Noticeboard would be shut down. Wikiquette Assistance will remain active. The DRN is primarily intended to resolve content disputes.
By Lionelt
Was your article deleted in spite of your best efforts to save it? You should consider having a copy restored to the Incubator where project members can help improve it. Upon meeting content criteria, articles are graduated to mainspace. The Incubator is also ideal for collaborating on new article drafts. Star Parker is the first addition to the incubator. The article was deleted per WP:POLITICIAN.
WikiProject Conservatism is expanding. We now have a satellite on Commons. Any help in categorizing images or in getting the fledgling project off the ground is appreciated.
We have a few new members who joined the project in September. Please give a hearty welcome to Conservative Philosopher, Screwball23 and Regushee by showing them some Wikilove. Screwball23 has been on WikiPedia for five years and has made major improvements to Linda McMahon. Regushee is not one for idle chit chat: an amazing 93% of their edits are in article space.