Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech G25: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Logitech G25: +scientific studies |
Stuartyeates (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**Reliable sources does not necessarily indicate sufficient notability for an article. See also [[WP:PRODUCT]]. -- [[User:Alan Liefting|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting|talk]]) - 19:59, 30 September 2011 (UTC) |
**Reliable sources does not necessarily indicate sufficient notability for an article. See also [[WP:PRODUCT]]. -- [[User:Alan Liefting|Alan Liefting]] ([[User_talk:Alan_Liefting|talk]]) - 19:59, 30 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - I found three strong reviews: [http://books.google.com/books?id=xQIAAAAAMBAJ&pg=RA1-PA88 Maximum PC], [http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2006/10/5730.ars Ars Technica], [http://nascar.about.com/od/steeringwheels/gr/logitechg25.htm About.com]. The Ars Technica is really good, the Maximum PC is only a half-page box review, but the About.com one is written by a NASCAR author and the head of About.com's NASCAR area. I also found [http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/2361663/Review-Logitech-G25-Racing-Wheel Stuff.co.nz] and [http://www.atomicgamer.com/articles/379/logitech-g25-racing-wheel AtomicGamer.com], but I can't verify their reliability. I was going to say delete until I found the About.com review. I think that with the three posted we can say the product is notable. I would also bet there are multiple reviews in printed enthusiast computer magazines as well. --[[User:Odie5533|Odie5533]] ([[User talk:Odie5533|talk]]) 23:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC) '''*EDIT*''' I think it's also worth noting that the G25 Wheel has been used in [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=logitech+g25+racing+wheel dozens] of scientific studies to test racing simulation environments. --[[User:Odie5533|Odie5533]] ([[User talk:Odie5533|talk]]) 23:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - I found three strong reviews: [http://books.google.com/books?id=xQIAAAAAMBAJ&pg=RA1-PA88 Maximum PC], [http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2006/10/5730.ars Ars Technica], [http://nascar.about.com/od/steeringwheels/gr/logitechg25.htm About.com]. The Ars Technica is really good, the Maximum PC is only a half-page box review, but the About.com one is written by a NASCAR author and the head of About.com's NASCAR area. I also found [http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/2361663/Review-Logitech-G25-Racing-Wheel Stuff.co.nz] and [http://www.atomicgamer.com/articles/379/logitech-g25-racing-wheel AtomicGamer.com], but I can't verify their reliability. I was going to say delete until I found the About.com review. I think that with the three posted we can say the product is notable. I would also bet there are multiple reviews in printed enthusiast computer magazines as well. --[[User:Odie5533|Odie5533]] ([[User talk:Odie5533|talk]]) 23:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC) '''*EDIT*''' I think it's also worth noting that the G25 Wheel has been used in [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=logitech+g25+racing+wheel dozens] of scientific studies to test racing simulation environments. --[[User:Odie5533|Odie5533]] ([[User talk:Odie5533|talk]]) 23:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 08:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:13, 5 October 2011
- Logitech G25 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:44, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - a WP:BEFORE search for reliable sources will turn up plenty of usable coverage. This (and the G27) are extremely high profile wheels for the PlayStation 2/3 platforms and have strong and direct ties to Gran Turismo 4 and Gran Turismo 5. --Teancum (talk) 12:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Reliable sources does not necessarily indicate sufficient notability for an article. See also WP:PRODUCT. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:59, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - I found three strong reviews: Maximum PC, Ars Technica, About.com. The Ars Technica is really good, the Maximum PC is only a half-page box review, but the About.com one is written by a NASCAR author and the head of About.com's NASCAR area. I also found Stuff.co.nz and AtomicGamer.com, but I can't verify their reliability. I was going to say delete until I found the About.com review. I think that with the three posted we can say the product is notable. I would also bet there are multiple reviews in printed enthusiast computer magazines as well. --Odie5533 (talk) 23:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC) *EDIT* I think it's also worth noting that the G25 Wheel has been used in dozens of scientific studies to test racing simulation environments. --Odie5533 (talk) 23:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)