Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BetaArchive: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
OBrasilo (talk | contribs)
A:-)Brunuś (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources|BetaArchive}})
:({{Find sources|BetaArchive}})
No reliable sources, only sources are WinRumors (a blog), itself, and its founder's personal site. So it fails both [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]], as well as [[WP:RS]]. [[User:OBrasilo|OBrasilo]] ([[User talk:OBrasilo|talk]]) 16:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
No reliable sources, only sources are WinRumors (a blog), itself, and its founder's personal site. So it fails both [[WP:N]] and [[WP:V]], as well as [[WP:RS]]. [[User:OBrasilo|OBrasilo]] ([[User talk:OBrasilo|talk]]) 16:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

'''Delete'''. Notable, but written like an advertisement. [[User:A:-)Brunuś|A:-)Brunuś]] ([[User talk:A:-)Brunuś|talk]]) 16:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:54, 6 October 2011

BetaArchive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, only sources are WinRumors (a blog), itself, and its founder's personal site. So it fails both WP:N and WP:V, as well as WP:RS. OBrasilo (talk) 16:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notable, but written like an advertisement. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 16:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]