Talk:Early childhood: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:50, 14 October 2011

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

To make this article better, the first thing it needs is sources. More research, photos, and description would make this article a lot better. Each section I think to improve needs at least two or three paragraphs for adequate information for readers. --Lwilmes (talk) 01:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

psych 101 edit

Your contribution added a lot more information. The only things i changed were i put your information in a different section so it wouldnt stay all in one long line and fixed a few spelling errors.--MeganJacobsmeyer94 (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)MeganJacobsmeyer94[reply]

psych 101 edit

Your contribution added a lot more information. The only things i changed were i put your information in a different section so it wouldnt stay all in one long line and fixed a few spelling errors.--MeganJacobsmeyer94 (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)MeganJacobsmeyer94[reply]

psych 101 edit

Your contribution added a lot more information. The only things i changed were i put your information in a different section so it wouldnt stay all in one long line and fixed a few spelling errors.--MeganJacobsmeyer94 (talk) 20:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)MeganJacobsmeyer94[reply]

psych 101 edit

Your contribution added a lot more information. The only things i changed were i put your information in a different section so it wouldnt stay all in one long line and fixed a few spelling errors.--MeganJacobsmeyer94 (talk) 20:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)MeganJacobsmeyer94[reply]

JennZmaila I corrected some spelling and grammer mistakes but the overall information was very useful for the article. You also need to cite your information! Ewoodruff13 (talk) 17:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I only corrected some minor spelling errors, but the information is very useful. The paragraph you did write does need a source still. --Lwilmes (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Psych 101 edit

I thought your early childhood article was very interesting. I didn't see anything wrong with it. I thought you did a wonderful job on it. User:Coolnick92

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 I only corrected some minor spelling errors, but the information is very useful. The paragraph you did write does need a source still. --[[User:Lwilmes|Lwilmes]] ([[User talk:Lwilmes|talk]]) 02:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
+== Psych 101 edit ==
+I thought your early childhood article was very interesting. I didn't see anything wrong with it. I thought you did a wonderful job on it. [[User:Coolnick92]]