Talk:Hal Foster (art critic): Difference between revisions
Lagrange613 (talk | contribs) copyright problem removed |
DYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=start|a&e-priority=Low|listas=Foster, Hal|a&e-work-group=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=start|a&e-priority=Low|listas=Foster, Hal|a&e-work-group=yes}} |
||
{{dyktalk|17 November|2011|entry=... that '''[[Hal Foster (art critic)|Hal Foster]]'''{{`s}} first book was a [[children's book]], and his second was a seminal text in [[postmodernism]]?}} |
|||
==Untitled== |
==Untitled== |
||
Revision as of 08:01, 17 November 2011
 | Biography: Arts and Entertainment Start‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from Hal Foster (art critic) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 November 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Untitled
I'd say that if one puts Greenberg, Fried, Krauss and Foster into the same 'lineage,' it is also necessary to mention the serious disagreements between them - or at least, in this case, between Foster and the others. Also, I don't believe that Habermas, Frampton, Baudrillard, et al., can all be accurately described as being 'pro-resistance' and 'anti-reaction' on the topic of postmodernism, even with the qualifier 'disparate' -- that is just Foster's formulation. For instance, I would say Habermas would be simply pro-modern, anti-postmodern. Blima3000 12:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
The current article, in my view, somewhat overstates the centrality of postmodernism as a concept for Foster. I would propose editing it to give a bit of a longer list of the different concepts that he uses - which I also volunteer myself to do, shortly... Blima3000 13:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
NPV??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.241.163 (talk) 06:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://books.google.com/books?id=wBicasuZmDIC&pg=PT79&lpg=PT79&source=bl&ots=aqCyFFAlpB&sig=spsA9XnyZp17LWl8-6SYFl-avMA&hl=en&ei=O4WbTpzUIaqoiAKxyqz_Bg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Lagrange613 01:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)