User talk:HotshotCleaner: Difference between revisions
GOCE newsletter using AWB |
Sebastian80 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/November 2011}} |
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/November 2011}} |
||
<small>Sent on behalf of the [[WP:GOCE|Guild of Copy Editors]] using [[Project:AWB|AWB]] on 01:13, 29 October 2011 (UTC)</small> |
<small>Sent on behalf of the [[WP:GOCE|Guild of Copy Editors]] using [[Project:AWB|AWB]] on 01:13, 29 October 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
==Regarding the [[Black mamba]] article== |
|||
I had requested a move to its scientific name ''Dendroaspis polylepis'', you had replied in the discussion but didn't say whether you supported the move or not. I'd really appreciate it if you'd just tell us if you are in support of the move or not. I'd really appreciate it if you supported the move, I mean countless other snake articles use the same title format I am trying to use for the black mamba. I don't see why the black mamba should be different from most of the other snake articles. But either way, I'd respect your decision. Thanks. [[User:Sebastian|Bastian]] ([[User talk:Sebastian80|talk]]) 22:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:42, 30 October 2011
GOCE drive newsletter
Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
 The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:13, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the Black mamba article
I had requested a move to its scientific name Dendroaspis polylepis, you had replied in the discussion but didn't say whether you supported the move or not. I'd really appreciate it if you'd just tell us if you are in support of the move or not. I'd really appreciate it if you supported the move, I mean countless other snake articles use the same title format I am trying to use for the black mamba. I don't see why the black mamba should be different from most of the other snake articles. But either way, I'd respect your decision. Thanks. Bastian (talk) 22:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC)