Charles Honorton: Difference between revisions
m Typo and General fixing, replaced: to try and prove → to try to prove using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
To that end Honorton conducted many ESP experiments, both hypothetical and in the real world, which attempted to focus on replicating data which had been collected by other scientists previously.<ref name="obit"/><ref>{{cite news|author = Dr. Julian de Bruyn Kops|title = FORETELLING PHONE CALLS ISN'T WITCHCRAFT|quote = |publisher = Idaho Falls Post Register|date = February 20, 1994|url = |accessdate = October 29, 2010}}</ref> Honorton's ultimate goal was to produce a method which could easily detect extended mention functioning. Much of Honorton's work also concentrated on various states of consciousness and how the brain functioned under abnormal conditions.<ref name="obit"/> |
To that end Honorton conducted many ESP experiments, both hypothetical and in the real world, which attempted to focus on replicating data which had been collected by other scientists previously.<ref name="obit"/><ref>{{cite news|author = Dr. Julian de Bruyn Kops|title = FORETELLING PHONE CALLS ISN'T WITCHCRAFT|quote = |publisher = Idaho Falls Post Register|date = February 20, 1994|url = |accessdate = October 29, 2010}}</ref> Honorton's ultimate goal was to produce a method which could easily detect extended mention functioning. Much of Honorton's work also concentrated on various states of consciousness and how the brain functioned under abnormal conditions.<ref name="obit"/> |
||
During the course of his research Honorton created the [[ |
During the course of his research Honorton created the [[Ganzfeld technique]], a mild sensory-deprevation technique designed to refocus the mind inwards.<ref>{{cite news|author = Lorn Macintyre|title = The man who is developing new senses for the new century|quote = |publisher = The Herald|date = January 6, 1993|url = |accessdate = October 29, 2010}}</ref> Honorton produced a lot of his experimental evidence for ESP using this technique. However, after a 1985 debate between Honoton and one of his critics, the procedure was changed in line with peer-reviewed guidelines. After the process had been changed, Honorton was still able to achieve the same results as he had previously.<ref>{{cite news|author = Susan Blackmore|title = Do you believe in psychic phenomena? Are they likely to be able to explain consciousness?; Consciousness; Conference; Towards a New Science of the Mind|quote = |publisher = The Times Higher Education Supplement|date = April 5, 1996|url = |accessdate = October 29, 2010}}</ref> |
||
Honorton rejected the term [[parapsychology]], instead preferring to call it psychophysics. To support this opinion he stated: "for the first time in history, we have begun to forge an empirical approach to one of the most profound and ancient of mysteries, the nature of mind and its relationship to the physical world."<ref name="obit"/> |
Honorton rejected the term [[parapsychology]], instead preferring to call it psychophysics. To support this opinion he stated: "for the first time in history, we have begun to forge an empirical approach to one of the most profound and ancient of mysteries, the nature of mind and its relationship to the physical world."<ref name="obit"/> |
Revision as of 19:55, 6 April 2012
Charles Henry Honorton (February 5, 1946 - November 4, 1992) was an American parapsychologist.
Honorton was born in Deer River, Minnesota on February 5, 1946.[1]
Honorton's research primarily focussed on ESP phenomena and he claimed that the purpose of his study was to bring the 'Mind-body' problem out of the realm of philosophy and into the realm of science.[1] He believed that the various findings of parapsychologists showed a systematic process which was the system onto which ESP and PK (which together are called 'psi') are built.
To that end Honorton conducted many ESP experiments, both hypothetical and in the real world, which attempted to focus on replicating data which had been collected by other scientists previously.[1][2] Honorton's ultimate goal was to produce a method which could easily detect extended mention functioning. Much of Honorton's work also concentrated on various states of consciousness and how the brain functioned under abnormal conditions.[1]
During the course of his research Honorton created the Ganzfeld technique, a mild sensory-deprevation technique designed to refocus the mind inwards.[3] Honorton produced a lot of his experimental evidence for ESP using this technique. However, after a 1985 debate between Honoton and one of his critics, the procedure was changed in line with peer-reviewed guidelines. After the process had been changed, Honorton was still able to achieve the same results as he had previously.[4]
Honorton rejected the term parapsychology, instead preferring to call it psychophysics. To support this opinion he stated: "for the first time in history, we have begun to forge an empirical approach to one of the most profound and ancient of mysteries, the nature of mind and its relationship to the physical world."[1]
Honorton was a research fellow at the Institute for Parapsychology Durham North Carolina from 1966–67, a research associate, then senior research associate, then Director of Research Division of Parapsychology and Psychophysics at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York from. 1967-79. After that he became the Director Psychophysical Research Laboratories at Princeton University, New Jersey from 1979-89[5] and from there he moved on to become a researcher at Edinburgh University from 1991 until his death.[6]
He died in on November 4, 1992 of a heart attack.[1]
Criticism
Many statisticians argued that the meta-analysis carried out by Honorton to try to prove an underlying pattern behind parasychological studies was ill-conceived and ignored basic rules of mathematics.[1][7] Honorton continued to claim that his meta-analysis, developed in the 1980s, conclusively proved that paraspychological research was replicable.[1][8]
Other critics have stated that the Ganzfeld technique is flawed as subjects still have partial awareness of their surroundings and as such could cheat during an ESP test.[9]
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h EMILY WILLIAMS COOK (November 19, 1992). "Obituary: Charles Honorton". The Independent.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Dr. Julian de Bruyn Kops (February 20, 1994). "FORETELLING PHONE CALLS ISN'T WITCHCRAFT". Idaho Falls Post Register.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Lorn Macintyre (January 6, 1993). "The man who is developing new senses for the new century". The Herald.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Susan Blackmore (April 5, 1996). "Do you believe in psychic phenomena? Are they likely to be able to explain consciousness?; Consciousness; Conference; Towards a New Science of the Mind". The Times Higher Education Supplement.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ John Palmer (March 8, 1987). "Why Is Science Spooked by 'psi'?". The Washington Post.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Susan Watts (February 15, 1993). "The American Association for the Advancement of Science: Magician presents evidence of ESP". The Independent.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ John Palmer (March 8, 1987). "Pink Noise and Dice". The Washington Post.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ "Tuning in to a presence of mind". The Scotsman. March 27, 1993.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ BRIAN D. JOSEPHSON (December 15, 1995). "Psychic shock; Books". The Times Higher Education Supplement.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help)