User talk:Laith Bustani: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:21, 12 September 2012

Welcome!

Hello, Laithbustani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Phoenix Project (Economy), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! →Σ τ c. 22:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Phoenix Project (Economy)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Phoenix Project (Economy), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 22:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Occupy Healthcare

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Occupy Healthcare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 02:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may have a conflict of interest with your recent edits

Hello Laithbustani. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. — frankie (talk) 14:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Please do not insert mentions of yourself in Wikipedia articles. Your user page also appears to be a soapbox; this is discouraged. See Wikipedia:User pages for user page guidelines. Hairhorn (talk) 16:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apoogies for newbie mistakes. I submit myself to the democratic principles of Wikipedia's rules and regulations and in no way wish to hijack or degrade the efforts to ensure this source is trustworthy and definitive.

I have done my best to ensure that my user page is factual and objective. Please point out any specific sections you feel contravene the regulations and I will strive to speedily repair/remove the offense. Thanks for your patience and willingness to teach. Laith Bustani (talk) 17:17, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Contract Physician Services Ontario Canada

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Contract Physician Services Ontario Canada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 5hin3 (talk) 10:33, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have deleted this article. May I suggest you build it in your user space before introducing it to article space. User:Laithbustani/Contract Physician Services Ontario Canada would be a suitable place. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 10:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About Physician Services Agreement

Hi Laith. I'm tidying up the article. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it when you believe the concerns have been addressed. (To resubmit the submission, add the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the page)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio (HSMR).
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 21:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Most Responsible Physician

The article Most Responsible Physician has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 17:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re: proposal at village pump

Hi, regarding your proposal at the Village Pump, about getting a govt. department into Wikipedia, I've decided to just post here, because the discussion is getting really long there anyway.

I like the sound of your idea, but I feel that more will be achieved by getting government departments to start using the Wiki software for their own purposes, perhaps with stricter rules for who can log in. The best thing for everyone to try is just to use the format of the Wikipedia Reference Desks for forum discussions related to any topic (normal internet forums have a silly format, so the Wiki thing could take off). From there, once that has been established, things could build incrementally from this kind of smaller starting point. Your reform proposal in Ontario might benefit by using a Reference Desk to facilitate discussion, which could then grow along with the community and begin to build encyclopedic content, some of which could be transferred to Wikipedia. Trying directly to introduce content without an established community I feel is too ambitious. Wikis only work because of established communities that develop around them, like any collaborative projects on the Internet. What are your thoughts? IBE (talk) 13:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Physician Services Agreement

The article Physician Services Agreement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no third party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 20:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 I like the sound of your idea, but I feel that more will be achieved by getting government departments to start using the Wiki software for their own purposes, perhaps with stricter rules for who can log in. The best thing for everyone to try is just to use the format of the Wikipedia Reference Desks for forum discussions related to any topic (normal internet forums have a silly format, so the Wiki thing could take off). From there, once that has been established, things could build incrementally from this kind of smaller starting point. Your reform proposal in Ontario might benefit by using a Reference Desk to facilitate discussion, which could then grow along with the community and begin to build encyclopedic content, some of which could be transferred to Wikipedia. Trying directly to introduce content without an established community I feel is too ambitious. Wikis only work because of established communities that develop around them, like any collaborative projects on the Internet. What are your thoughts? [[User:It&#39;s Been Emotional|IBE]] ([[User talk:It&#39;s Been Emotional|talk]]) 13:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
+== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Physician Services Agreement]] ==
+[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]
+The article [[Physician Services Agreement]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32; because of the following concern:
+:'''Not notable, no third party sources'''
+While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
+You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Physician Services Agreement|the article's talk page]].
+Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Hairhorn|Hairhorn]] ([[User talk:Hairhorn|talk]]) 20:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)