Lydia Fairchild: Difference between revisions
put the citation after the fucking fact, not before |
This article is about Lydia Fairchild, not about Karen Keegan. Tag: references removed |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This resulted in Fairchild's being taken to court for fraud for claiming benefit for other people's children or taking part in a [[Surrogacy#United_Kingdom|surrogacy]] scam. Hospital records of her prior births were disregarded. Prosecutors called for her two children to be taken into care. As time came for her to give birth to her third child, the judge ordered a witness be present at the birth. This witness was to ensure that blood samples were immediately taken from both the child and Fairchild. Two weeks later, DNA tests indicated that she was not the mother of that child either. |
This resulted in Fairchild's being taken to court for fraud for claiming benefit for other people's children or taking part in a [[Surrogacy#United_Kingdom|surrogacy]] scam. Hospital records of her prior births were disregarded. Prosecutors called for her two children to be taken into care. As time came for her to give birth to her third child, the judge ordered a witness be present at the birth. This witness was to ensure that blood samples were immediately taken from both the child and Fairchild. Two weeks later, DNA tests indicated that she was not the mother of that child either. |
||
A breakthrough came when a lawyer for the prosecution found an article in the ''[[The New England Journal of Medicine|New England Journal of Medicine]]'' about a similar case that had happened in Boston<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1056/NEJMoa013452|last=Yu|first=Neng|coauthors=; et al.|date=16 May 2002|title=Disputed Maternity Leading to Identification of Tetragametic Chimerism|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|volume=346|issue=20|pages=1545–1552|pmid=12015394|url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/346/20/1545?query=TOC}}</ref> He realised that Fairchild's case might also be caused by [[chimera (genetics)|chimerism]]. |
A breakthrough came when a lawyer for the prosecution found an article in the ''[[The New England Journal of Medicine|New England Journal of Medicine]]'' about a similar case involving a woman called Karen Keegan that had happened in Boston.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1056/NEJMoa013452|last=Yu|first=Neng|coauthors=; et al.|date=16 May 2002|title=Disputed Maternity Leading to Identification of Tetragametic Chimerism|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|volume=346|issue=20|pages=1545–1552|pmid=12015394|url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/346/20/1545?query=TOC}}</ref> He realised that Fairchild's case might also be caused by [[chimera (genetics)|chimerism]]. Fairchild's prosecutors suggested this possibility to her lawyers, who arranged further testing. As in Keegan's case, DNA samples were taken from members of the extended family. The DNA of Fairchild's children matched that of Fairchild's mother to the extent expected of a grandmother. They also found that, although the DNA in Fairchild's skin and hair did not match her children's, the DNA from a cervical smear test did match. Fairchild was carrying two different sets of DNA, the defining characteristic of a [[Chimera (genetics)|chimera]]. |
||
Fairchild's prosecutors suggested this possibility to her lawyers, who arranged further testing. As in Keegan's case, DNA samples were taken from members of the extended family. The DNA of Fairchild's children matched that of Fairchild's mother to the extent expected of a grandmother. They also found that, although the DNA in Fairchild's skin and hair did not match her children's, the DNA from a cervical smear test did match. Fairchild was carrying two different sets of DNA, the defining characteristic of a [[Chimera (genetics)|chimera]]. |
|||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
Revision as of 16:58, 22 January 2012
Lydia Fairchild and her children are the subjects of a documentary called The Twin Inside Me (also known as "I Am My Own Twin").[1]
Lydia Fairchild was pregnant with her third child when she and the father of her children, Jamie Townsend, separated. When Fairchild applied for welfare support in 2002, she was requested to provide DNA evidence that Townsend was the father of her children. While the results showed Townsend was certainly the father of the children, the DNA tests indicated that she was not their mother.
This resulted in Fairchild's being taken to court for fraud for claiming benefit for other people's children or taking part in a surrogacy scam. Hospital records of her prior births were disregarded. Prosecutors called for her two children to be taken into care. As time came for her to give birth to her third child, the judge ordered a witness be present at the birth. This witness was to ensure that blood samples were immediately taken from both the child and Fairchild. Two weeks later, DNA tests indicated that she was not the mother of that child either.
A breakthrough came when a lawyer for the prosecution found an article in the New England Journal of Medicine about a similar case involving a woman called Karen Keegan that had happened in Boston.[2] He realised that Fairchild's case might also be caused by chimerism. Fairchild's prosecutors suggested this possibility to her lawyers, who arranged further testing. As in Keegan's case, DNA samples were taken from members of the extended family. The DNA of Fairchild's children matched that of Fairchild's mother to the extent expected of a grandmother. They also found that, although the DNA in Fairchild's skin and hair did not match her children's, the DNA from a cervical smear test did match. Fairchild was carrying two different sets of DNA, the defining characteristic of a chimera.
Notes
- ^ "The Twin Inside Me: Extraordinary People". TV5. Archived from the original on May 26, 2006.
- ^ Yu, Neng (16 May 2002). "Disputed Maternity Leading to Identification of Tetragametic Chimerism". New England Journal of Medicine. 346 (20): 1545–1552. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa013452. PMID 12015394.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help)
References
- ABC News: She's Her Own Twin Article on Lydia
- Kids' DNA Tested, Parent Informed The DNA Is Not A Match Article on Lydia's case
- The Stranger Within Article on Karen Keegan's case
- Genetic Mosaics Discussion on Tetragametic Humans
- DNA Tests Shed Light on 'Hybrid Humans' NPR recording.
- Mayne, Eleanor (March 5, 2006). "The mother with three children who don't share her DNA - and why her astonishing story will throw doubt on the 'foolproof' evidence in thousands of court cases". The Mail on Sunday, London. pp. 18–19.