Jump to content

Talk:Hartman Personality Profile: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
LDS mention: new section
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 97.75.188.130 - "LDS mention: new section"
Line 19: Line 19:
== LDS mention ==
== LDS mention ==


In the article there's a mention of the LDS (Latter-day Saint) church. but no mention of how this relates or why this church in particular factors into this discussion. I don't know the history of test or researcher, but does this imply that Dr. Hartman was a Mormon? Is the test common among the Mormon church? As a Mormon myself, I've seen it used for fun in a few situations, but never seriously or as a church-sanctioned activity.
In the article there's a mention of the LDS (Latter-day Saint) church. but no mention of how this relates or why this church in particular factors into this discussion. I don't know the history of test or researcher, but does this imply that Dr. Hartman was a Mormon? Is the test common among the Mormon church? As a Mormon myself, I've seen it used for fun in a few situations, but never seriously or as a church-sanctioned activity. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/97.75.188.130|97.75.188.130]] ([[User talk:97.75.188.130|talk]]) 03:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 03:37, 31 January 2012

Science

A section on the origin of the theory would be good. For instance, was it found to more completely account for variance in the questionnaire? What is the empirical basis for the questionnaire? Jim Bowery (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrght

This looks like it was pulled straight from the book, isn't that a copyright violation? 128.187.0.178 (talk) 07:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. Do we know for sure that it wasn't authorized by the copyright holder? Chiralgia (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between the four temperaments and the four personality types in the Hartman Personality Profile? They seem to correspond:

  • Red: The Power Wielders = Powerful Choleric
  • Blue: The Do-gooders = Perfect Melancholy
  • White: The Peacekeepers = Peaceful Phlegmatic
  • Yellow: The Fun Lovers = Popular Sanguine

Chiralgia (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like wikipedia, but this article highlights all of its weaknesses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.227.7.138 (talk) 02:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LDS mention

In the article there's a mention of the LDS (Latter-day Saint) church. but no mention of how this relates or why this church in particular factors into this discussion. I don't know the history of test or researcher, but does this imply that Dr. Hartman was a Mormon? Is the test common among the Mormon church? As a Mormon myself, I've seen it used for fun in a few situations, but never seriously or as a church-sanctioned activity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.75.188.130 (talk) 03:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]