Ghost imaging: Difference between revisions
Encycloshave (talk | contribs) Wikified |
m Typo fixing and cleanup, typos fixed: , → , using AWB |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
It was soon realized that the correlations between the [[light beam]] that hits the camera and the beam that hits the object can be purely classical. If quantum correlations are present, the signal-to-noise [[ratio]] of the reconstructed image can be improved. The exact role of quantum and classical correlations in ghost imaging is still controversial. |
It was soon realized that the correlations between the [[light beam]] that hits the camera and the beam that hits the object can be purely classical. If quantum correlations are present, the signal-to-noise [[ratio]] of the reconstructed image can be improved. The exact role of quantum and classical correlations in ghost imaging is still controversial. |
||
In 2009 'pseudothermal ghost imaging' and 'ghost [[diffraction]]' were demonstrated using only a single single-pixel detector<ref>[http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2633 'Ghost Imaging with a Single Detector'] by Y.Bromberg, O.Katz and Y.Silberberg</ref> |
In 2009 'pseudothermal ghost imaging' and 'ghost [[diffraction]]' were demonstrated using only a single single-pixel detector.<ref>[http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2633 'Ghost Imaging with a Single Detector'] by Y.Bromberg, O.Katz and Y.Silberberg</ref> This was achieved by implementing the 'Computational ghost-imaging' scheme, relaxing the need to evoke quantum correlations arguments for the pseudothermal source case.<ref>[http://arxiv1.library.cornell.edu/abs/0807.2614v1 'Computational Ghost Imaging'] by J.Shapiro</ref> |
||
Recently, it was shown that the principles of [[ |
Recently, it was shown that the principles of [[compressed sensing|'Compressed-Sensing']] can be directly utilized to reduce the number of measurements required for image reconstruction in GI.<ref>[http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0321 'Compressive Ghost Imaging'] by O.Katz, Y.Bromberg and Y.Silberberg</ref> This allowed to acquire an N pixel image with much less than N measurements and may have applications in [[lidar|LIDAR]] and [[microscopy]] |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
* [http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn13825-quantum-camera-snaps-objects-it-cannot-see.html Quantum camera snaps objects it cannot 'see'] by Belle Dume, New Scientist, 2 May 2008. Accessed July 2008 |
* [http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn13825-quantum-camera-snaps-objects-it-cannot-see.html Quantum camera snaps objects it cannot 'see'] by Belle Dume, New Scientist, 2 May 2008. Accessed July 2008 |
||
* [http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/ghost-imaging-s.html Air Force Demonstrates 'Ghost Imaging'] By Sharon Weinberger |
* [http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/ghost-imaging-s.html Air Force Demonstrates 'Ghost Imaging'] By Sharon Weinberger, Wired, 3 June 2008. Accessed July 2008 |
||
[[Category:Quantum mechanics]] |
[[Category:Quantum mechanics]] |
||
Revision as of 10:24, 1 July 2012
Ghost imaging (GI) is a technique that allows a high resolution camera to produce an image of an object which the camera cannot itself see. This method reduces the number of measurements required for image reconstruction.
History
The first demonstrations of ghost imaging were based on the quantum nature of light. Specifically, quantum correlations between photon pairs were utilized to build up an image of the unseen object. When one of the photons strikes the object, the other follows a different path to the camera's lens. If the camera is constructed to only record pixels from photons that hit simultaneously at the object and the camera's image plane, an image of the object is reconstructed.
It was soon realized that the correlations between the light beam that hits the camera and the beam that hits the object can be purely classical. If quantum correlations are present, the signal-to-noise ratio of the reconstructed image can be improved. The exact role of quantum and classical correlations in ghost imaging is still controversial.
In 2009 'pseudothermal ghost imaging' and 'ghost diffraction' were demonstrated using only a single single-pixel detector.[1] This was achieved by implementing the 'Computational ghost-imaging' scheme, relaxing the need to evoke quantum correlations arguments for the pseudothermal source case.[2]
Recently, it was shown that the principles of 'Compressed-Sensing' can be directly utilized to reduce the number of measurements required for image reconstruction in GI.[3] This allowed to acquire an N pixel image with much less than N measurements and may have applications in LIDAR and microscopy
References
- ^ 'Ghost Imaging with a Single Detector' by Y.Bromberg, O.Katz and Y.Silberberg
- ^ 'Computational Ghost Imaging' by J.Shapiro
- ^ 'Compressive Ghost Imaging' by O.Katz, Y.Bromberg and Y.Silberberg
External links
- Quantum camera snaps objects it cannot 'see' by Belle Dume, New Scientist, 2 May 2008. Accessed July 2008
- Air Force Demonstrates 'Ghost Imaging' By Sharon Weinberger, Wired, 3 June 2008. Accessed July 2008
 | This physics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This quantum mechanics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |