Warden's Five Rings: Difference between revisions
Copy edit |
m Dating maintenance tags: {{By whom}} |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Each level of system or "ring" was considered one of the enemy's centers of gravity. The idea behind Warden's five rings was to attack each of the rings to paralyze their forces, an objective also known as ''physical paralysis''. To optimize a strike attack the attacker would engage as many rings as possible with special emphasis on taking out the center ring, which is the enemy's leadership. This would result in total physical [[paralysis]]. |
Each level of system or "ring" was considered one of the enemy's centers of gravity. The idea behind Warden's five rings was to attack each of the rings to paralyze their forces, an objective also known as ''physical paralysis''. To optimize a strike attack the attacker would engage as many rings as possible with special emphasis on taking out the center ring, which is the enemy's leadership. This would result in total physical [[paralysis]]. |
||
Warden's theories on the application of air power in modern war have been criticized{{by whom}} as little more than a reiteration of earlier strategic bombing concepts discredited by historical analysis of the [[Second World War]] and the [[Vietnam War]], similar to the effect on the writings of [[Giulio Douhet]]. Dismissal of the theories has led some to mistakenly conclude that the theories have no application, thereby missing the application of air power as a modern means of accomplishing the Strategic Indirect of Sir [[B. H. Liddell Hart]]. |
Warden's theories on the application of air power in modern war have been criticized{{by whom|date=February 2012}} as little more than a reiteration of earlier strategic bombing concepts discredited by historical analysis of the [[Second World War]] and the [[Vietnam War]], similar to the effect on the writings of [[Giulio Douhet]]. Dismissal of the theories has led some to mistakenly conclude that the theories have no application, thereby missing the application of air power as a modern means of accomplishing the Strategic Indirect of Sir [[B. H. Liddell Hart]]. |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
Revision as of 04:23, 25 February 2012
Warden's Five Rings represent a theory of military strategic attack, based on five levels of system attributes. They are named in honor of Col. John A. Warden III, a former USAF officer and theorist of air power.
The Five Rings include:
- Leadership
- Organic/System Essentials
- Infrastructure
- Population
- Fielded Military Forces
Each level of system or "ring" was considered one of the enemy's centers of gravity. The idea behind Warden's five rings was to attack each of the rings to paralyze their forces, an objective also known as physical paralysis. To optimize a strike attack the attacker would engage as many rings as possible with special emphasis on taking out the center ring, which is the enemy's leadership. This would result in total physical paralysis.
Warden's theories on the application of air power in modern war have been criticized[by whom?] as little more than a reiteration of earlier strategic bombing concepts discredited by historical analysis of the Second World War and the Vietnam War, similar to the effect on the writings of Giulio Douhet. Dismissal of the theories has led some to mistakenly conclude that the theories have no application, thereby missing the application of air power as a modern means of accomplishing the Strategic Indirect of Sir B. H. Liddell Hart.
See also
References
External links
- Air Theory for the Twenty-First Century, by Col. John Warden, USAF
- Warden and the Air Corps Tactical School
 | This United States military article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |