Talk:2012 Hong Kong Chief Executive election: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:36, 8 March 2012

Hong Kong Stub‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (33)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (298)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,068)

Image needed (347)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,534) • Stub-Class articles (6,673)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (382) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,345)

Return permit

Democratic party members not being given home entry permits. A couple of questions - I'm not sure if all democratic party members are not allowed the permits, or only some. Also,I don't think there is an official reason why those like Ho are not given a permit (even though everyone knows why). And, as Ho is not going to win, the fact that he cannot go to Mainland China is not really relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.177.38.242 (talk • contribs)

You count the number of times Donald Tsang has had to enter the mainland for paperwork, signings, visits etc. Many many times. It is not possible to be chief exec, while limited to just the SAR territories. Benjwong (talk) 03:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recently deleted content

So editor Ohconfucius and HKfuture has deleted the following content multiple times regarding candidate Yu Wing-yin.

"He is known for supporting the crackdown actions of the Communist government during the 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests, and said it was too bad they didn't have water cannons and plastic bullets."^[1]

This is relevant to this election because it shows where a non-party candidate takes stands. I am tempted to put this back, but will discuss here first. Benjwong (talk) 02:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just me and Hkfuture (talk · contribs) who see it as a coatrack. It was previously removed by RTBED (talk · contribs). Having said that, the two preceding named editors may be socks, but that's another matter.
Yu Wing-yin is not even a candidate, but somebody who announced that he was seeking nominations. He has such a cameo role in this play, and zero support from EC members, that I would have few hesitations in removing everything except his name as a passing mention. So far, I have refrained. We don't talk about any of the candidates stances or policy issues here in the article (maybe we should); in the absence, I feel that talking about his stance on June 4 is over the top to the extreme. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 03:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

^ "余永賢選特首指六四處理果斷". Am730.com.hk. Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2012.

[1] "余永賢選特首指六四處理果斷". Am730.com.hk. Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2012.

[1]

Revision as of 03:35, 8 March 2012 edit Ohconfucius (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 328,947 edits →Recently deleted content ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:36, 8 March 2012 edit undo Ohconfucius (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 328,947 edits →Recently deleted content: WP:SOCK Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	This is relevant to this election because it shows where a non-party candidate takes stands. I am tempted to put this back, but will discuss here first. [[User:Benjwong\|Benjwong]] ([[User talk:Benjwong\|talk]]) 02:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)		This is relevant to this election because it shows where a non-party candidate takes stands. I am tempted to put this back, but will discuss here first. [[User:Benjwong\|Benjwong]] ([[User talk:Benjwong\|talk]]) 02:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
	*It's not just me and {{User\|Hkfuture}} who see it as a coatrack. It was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hong_Kong_Chief_Executive_election,_2012&diff=479252110&oldid=479225391 previously removed] by {{User\|RTBED}}. Yu Wing-yin is not even a candidate, but somebody who announced that he was seeking nominations. He has such a cameo role in this play, and zero support from EC members, that I would have few hesitations in removing everything except his name as a passing mention. So far, I have refrained. We don't talk about any of the candidates stances or policy issues here in the article (maybe we should); in the absence, I feel that talking about his stance on June 4 is [[WP:UNDUE\|over the top]] to the extreme. --<small>[[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]]</small> 03:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)		*It's not just me and {{User\|Hkfuture}} who see it as a coatrack. It was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hong_Kong_Chief_Executive_election,_2012&diff=479252110&oldid=479225391 previously removed] by {{User\|RTBED}}. Having said that, the two preceding named editors may be [[WP:SOCK\|socks]], but that's another matter.<p>Yu Wing-yin is not even a candidate, but somebody who announced that he was seeking nominations. He has such a cameo role in this play, and zero support from EC members, that I would have few hesitations in removing everything except his name as a passing mention. So far, I have refrained. We don't talk about any of the candidates stances or policy issues here in the article (maybe we should); in the absence, I feel that talking about his stance on June 4 is [[WP:UNDUE\|over the top]] to the extreme. --<small>[[User:Ohconfucius\|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius\|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]]</small> 03:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)