User talk:Andrija987

Hi everyone, this is my talk page. If there is anything you need to discuss with me then let me know.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Julia Gillard, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KoshVorlon Angeli I demoni krushil nado mnoj 13:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Julia Gillard. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Also, please keep a neutral point of view when editing. Thanks, -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 13:06, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Julia Gillard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It seems to me, that you are not showing a neutral point of view on a wide range of article's, related to Julia Gillard. In some cases you have vandalized them. This is unacceptable, so please take this as a final warning. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 13:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrija987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I promise that I will refrain from abusing editing priviledges in the future Andrija987 (talk) 10:48 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

After edits like this, you will need to do a much better job of explaining why you should be unblocked. TNXMan 14:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WaggersTALK 14:30, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrija987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please Sir/Madam, I would like to be unblocked as I wish to make constructive edits to Wikipedia articles in the future that will be relevant. I sincerely promise to refrain from vandalising Wikipedia articles. My explanation for the editing of Julia Gillard article was that I was only making edits in a satirical fashion and I promise to stop conducting these types of edits in the future. Andrija987 (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See WP:EBUR - intended humour is still vandalism (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.