Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HARA-KIRI: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→HARA-KIRI: Delete |
del |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Doesn't meet [[WP:NFF]] and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Ubelowme|Ubelowme]] ([[User talk:Ubelowme|talk]]) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Doesn't meet [[WP:NFF]] and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Ubelowme|Ubelowme]] ([[User talk:Ubelowme|talk]]) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete'''. No evidence that is happening, still less that it is notable. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 22:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:00, 6 June 2012
- HARA-KIRI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Film has not started shooting yet, which means it fails WP:NFILMS, and there are no sources provided to show WP:GNG notability. I can't find any sources (though it's a tricky subject to Google for - there have been several films with similar titles). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NFF and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet WP:GNG. Ubelowme (talk) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence that is happening, still less that it is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)