Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HARA-KIRI: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:00, 6 June 2012

HARA-KIRI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film has not started shooting yet, which means it fails WP:NFILMS, and there are no sources provided to show WP:GNG notability. I can't find any sources (though it's a tricky subject to Google for - there have been several films with similar titles). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NFF and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet WP:GNG. Ubelowme (talk) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence that is happening, still less that it is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:21, 6 June 2012 edit Ubelowme (talk \| contribs) 1,719 edits →HARA-KIRI: Delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:00, 6 June 2012 edit undo RHaworth (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 118,796 edits del Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	*'''Delete'''. Doesn't meet [[WP:NFF]] and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Ubelowme\|Ubelowme]] ([[User talk:Ubelowme\|talk]]) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)		*'''Delete'''. Doesn't meet [[WP:NFF]] and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Ubelowme\|Ubelowme]] ([[User talk:Ubelowme\|talk]]) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
			* '''Delete'''. No evidence that is happening, still less that it is notable. — [[User:RHaworth\|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth\|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth\|contribs]]) 22:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)