Jump to content

Talk:Macedonian Question: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


:The thing is that the "Macedonian Question" is a late 19th topic of specific content which is highly irrelevant to the modern claims of FYR Macedonia and its dispute with Greece. It is also irrelevant to anqituity and practically most of the things the article focuses on. The article gives a POV interpretation of the Macedonian question as it's perceived by the modern Slavic Macedonian nation, and it should be subjected to clean-up. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 21:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
:The thing is that the "Macedonian Question" is a late 19th topic of specific content which is highly irrelevant to the modern claims of FYR Macedonia and its dispute with Greece. It is also irrelevant to anqituity and practically most of the things the article focuses on. The article gives a POV interpretation of the Macedonian question as it's perceived by the modern Slavic Macedonian nation, and it should be subjected to clean-up. [[User:Miskin|Miskin]] 21:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

::I agree that the section on antiquity and the middle ages should be removed, as it is of no importance for the article. --[[User:Aldux|Aldux]] 22:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:05, 23 April 2006

I am not Greek, nor Macedonian, I was just looking for information on Macedonia and find the quote "Macedonia’s vile and evil southern neighbor, Greece" to be hilarious. How can anyone take any of the rest of the article seriously with a quote like that?


the problem is that the Macedonian question is a controversial issue, and whenever someone from the nations involved reads this, they have a need to change it.... stupid, but..

The thing is that the "Macedonian Question" is a late 19th topic of specific content which is highly irrelevant to the modern claims of FYR Macedonia and its dispute with Greece. It is also irrelevant to anqituity and practically most of the things the article focuses on. The article gives a POV interpretation of the Macedonian question as it's perceived by the modern Slavic Macedonian nation, and it should be subjected to clean-up. Miskin 21:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the section on antiquity and the middle ages should be removed, as it is of no importance for the article. --Aldux 22:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]