Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H-Store: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
UMD-Database (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by [[WP:GNG]]. Sources offered are all [[WP:PRIMARY]]. I have searched for better sources with Google and found nothing useful. It's possible this may become notable in the future, but for now, it's [[WP:TOOSOON]]. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 00:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC) |
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by [[WP:GNG]]. Sources offered are all [[WP:PRIMARY]]. I have searched for better sources with Google and found nothing useful. It's possible this may become notable in the future, but for now, it's [[WP:TOOSOON]]. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 00:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''': I just rewrote this article to use less language from their website and add more meaningful citations (I am not affiliated with this project). This system is significant because it represents the beginning of a new wave of database systems, much like how MongoDB and those types of systems are part of the NoSQL wave. This is not a product like DBeaver. If you don't know the history of previous academic systems from this group, like [[C-Store]], then you shouldn't be commenting.--[[User:UMD-Database|UMD-Database]] ([[User talk:UMD-Database|talk]]) 04:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. This feels similar to the DBeaver page nominated for deletion yesterday in that there is not enough signifiance to it. At the moment I would argue that this would fail [[WP:GNG]]. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Velinath|Velinath]] ([[User talk:Velinath|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Velinath|contribs]]) 03:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
*'''Delete'''. This feels similar to the DBeaver page nominated for deletion yesterday in that there is not enough signifiance to it. At the moment I would argue that this would fail [[WP:GNG]]. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Velinath|Velinath]] ([[User talk:Velinath|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Velinath|contribs]]) 03:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 04:37, 6 July 2012
- H-Store (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Sources offered are all WP:PRIMARY. I have searched for better sources with Google and found nothing useful. It's possible this may become notable in the future, but for now, it's WP:TOOSOON. Msnicki (talk) 00:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: I just rewrote this article to use less language from their website and add more meaningful citations (I am not affiliated with this project). This system is significant because it represents the beginning of a new wave of database systems, much like how MongoDB and those types of systems are part of the NoSQL wave. This is not a product like DBeaver. If you don't know the history of previous academic systems from this group, like C-Store, then you shouldn't be commenting.--UMD-Database (talk) 04:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. This feels similar to the DBeaver page nominated for deletion yesterday in that there is not enough signifiance to it. At the moment I would argue that this would fail WP:GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Velinath (talk • contribs) 03:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)