Talk:Jonathan Fisher (barrister)

Untitled

The page is unbiased, informative and verifiable. Hannah.rachel0801 (talk) 13:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

The page is about a professional and an academic who has been the subject of secondary source material that is intellectually independent for example see, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/staff/jonathan-fisher.htm Hannah.rachel0801 (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

The nomination for deletion isn not on the grounds that it's an advert although I see that the topic has previously been deleted for that reason, and by your statement (on the article page not her, incidentally) I can only assume you know that also. The ground for deletion is that Jonathan Fisher isn't notable enough to merit inclusion, see WP:BIO. NtheP (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

I have reviewed the page 'Jonathan Fisher (lawyer)' and having researched the internet sources listed on the page, it is clear to me that all the information is correct and well substantiated. Consequently, the tags that were applied to the page are no longer applicable and I have removed them. Natural born singer (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Natural Born Singer

No one has disputed whether the information is correct or not; the main issues are conflict of interest and promotion. There is still some promotional language, and this is still largely a resume style entry. Usually maintenance tags are removed after a rewrite. Hairhorn (talk) 13:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

COI

There are persistent COI and single-purpose accounts editing this page, introducing dubious language throughout. I'm not convinced that cleanup is anywhere near complete. Hairhorn (talk) 01:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Where is the conflict of interest? And what is objected to about the content. This has all been discussed before, and the information is all verifiable and correct. That falls a long way short of a conflict of interest. And neither is there anything wrong with a single purpose account. Not everyone needs to spend all his time on WP. Ironman1104 (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

The conflict of interest issues are discussed at length at User talk:Hannah.rachel0801, User talk:Fisherjon1 and elsewhere. Hairhorn (talk) 18:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

I am aware of that old discussion. The info is verifiable and correct. What's the problem? Ironman1104 (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

If you've read the discussions you already know where the conflict of interest is, so there's little point asking where it lies. Hairhorn (talk) 12:34, 29 July 2012 (UTC)