User talk:Coeus24: Difference between revisions
m UT |
m ut |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===UT Football=== |
===UT Football=== |
||
I undid you last edit only due to the fact that the school has them with this record. The record book may have made a mistake when they where publishing it. They only give the school 115 years and UT has them as 116 so someone made a mistake. I am not saying you did since the record book has what you posted.[[User:MDSanker|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.7em 0.7em 0.7em; letter-spacing: 4px; padding: 3px 6px;"> <i>MDSanker</i></span>]] 15:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC) |
I undid you last edit only due to the fact that the school has them with this record. The record book may have made a mistake when they where publishing it. They only give the school 115 years and UT has them as 116 so someone made a mistake. I am not saying you did since the record book has what you posted.[[User:MDSanker|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.7em 0.7em 0.7em; letter-spacing: 4px; padding: 3px 6px;"> <i>MDSanker</i></span>]] 15:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
UT started playing football in 1896. 1896 to 2012 is 121 years. UT didn't have a team during six of those years = 115 years. The source you cited hadn't been updated since January; since that time, a loss to Penn State was changed to win as a result of the Sandusky scandal (hence, the added win). My source is up to date and accurate, and therefore I undid your undoCoeus24 (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
The Penn State loss is still a loss for the team that lost per NCAA instructions. Sorry. If they had forfeited the games yes they would have been a win, however they vacated the games. [[User:MDSanker|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.7em 0.7em 0.7em; letter-spacing: 4px; padding: 3px 6px;"> <i>MDSanker</i></span>]] 01:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
The Penn State loss is still a loss for the team that lost per NCAA instructions. Sorry. If they had forfeited the games yes they would have been a win, however they vacated the games. [[User:MDSanker|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.7em 0.7em 0.7em; letter-spacing: 4px; padding: 3px 6px;"> <i>MDSanker</i></span>]] 01:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:32, 16 August 2012
UT Football
I undid you last edit only due to the fact that the school has them with this record. The record book may have made a mistake when they where publishing it. They only give the school 115 years and UT has them as 116 so someone made a mistake. I am not saying you did since the record book has what you posted. MDSanker 15:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
UT started playing football in 1896. 1896 to 2012 is 121 years. UT didn't have a team during six of those years = 115 years. The source you cited hadn't been updated since January; since that time, a loss to Penn State was changed to win as a result of the Sandusky scandal (hence, the added win). My source is up to date and accurate, and therefore I undid your undoCoeus24 (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
The Penn State loss is still a loss for the team that lost per NCAA instructions. Sorry. If they had forfeited the games yes they would have been a win, however they vacated the games. MDSanker 01:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)