Jump to content

Complex multiplication: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Singular moduli: cite Silverman (1989), (1994)
Abstract theory of endomorphisms: cite Silverman (1989)
Line 33: Line 33:


==Abstract theory of endomorphisms==
==Abstract theory of endomorphisms==
The ring of endomorphisms of an elliptic curves can be of one of three forms:the integers '''Z'''; an [[Order (ring theory)|order]] in an [[imaginary quadratic number field]]; or an order in a definite [[quaternion algebra]] over '''Q'''.<ref>Silverman (1989) p.102</ref>


When the base field is a [[finite field]], there are always non-trivial endomorphisms of an elliptic curve; so the ''complex multiplication'' case is in a sense typical (and the terminology isn't often applied). But when the base field is a number field, complex multiplication is the exception. It is known that, in a general sense, the case of complex multiplication is the hardest to resolve for the [[Hodge conjecture]].
When the base field is a [[finite field]], there are always non-trivial endomorphisms of an elliptic curve; so the ''complex multiplication'' case is in a sense typical (and the terminology isn't often applied). But when the base field is a number field, complex multiplication is the exception. It is known that, in a general sense, the case of complex multiplication is the hardest to resolve for the [[Hodge conjecture]].

Revision as of 21:40, 22 August 2012

In mathematics, complex multiplication is the theory of elliptic curves E that have an endomorphism ring larger than the integers; and also the theory in higher dimensions of abelian varieties A having enough endomorphisms in a certain precise sense (it roughly means that the action on the tangent space at the identity element of A is a direct sum of one-dimensional modules). Put another way, it contains the theory of elliptic functions with extra symmetries, such as are visible when the period lattice is the Gaussian integer lattice or Eisenstein integer lattice.

It has an aspect belonging to the theory of special functions, because such elliptic functions, or abelian functions of several complex variables, are then 'very special' functions satisfying extra identities and taking evaluable special values at particular points. It has also turned out to be a central theme in algebraic number theory, allowing some features of the theory of cyclotomic fields to be carried over to wider areas of application.

David Hilbert is said to have remarked that the theory of complex multiplication of elliptic curves was not only the most beautiful part of mathematics but of all science.[1]

Example

An example of an elliptic curve with complex multiplication is

C/Z[i

where Z[i] is the Gaussian integer ring, and θ is any non-zero complex number. Any such complex torus has the Gaussian integers as endomorphism ring. It is known that the corresponding curves can all be written as

Y2 = 4X3aX,

having an order 4 automorphism sending

Y → −iY, X → −X

in line with the action of i on the Weierstrass elliptic functions.

This is a typical example of an elliptic curve with complex multiplication. Over the complex numbers, all elliptic curves with complex multiplcation can be similarly constructed. That is, as quotients of the complex plane by some order in the ring of integers in an imaginary quadratic field.

Abstract theory of endomorphisms

The ring of endomorphisms of an elliptic curves can be of one of three forms:the integers Z; an order in an imaginary quadratic number field; or an order in a definite quaternion algebra over Q.[2]

When the base field is a finite field, there are always non-trivial endomorphisms of an elliptic curve; so the complex multiplication case is in a sense typical (and the terminology isn't often applied). But when the base field is a number field, complex multiplication is the exception. It is known that, in a general sense, the case of complex multiplication is the hardest to resolve for the Hodge conjecture.

Kronecker and abelian extensions

Kronecker first postulated that the values of elliptic functions at torsion points should be enough to generate all abelian extensions for imaginary quadratic fields, an idea that went back to Eisenstein in some cases, and even to Gauss. This became known as the Kronecker Jugendtraum; and was certainly what had prompted Hilbert's remark above, since it makes explicit class field theory in the way the roots of unity do for abelian extensions of the rational number field, via Shimura's reciprocity law. Many generalisations have been sought of Kronecker's ideas; they do however lie somewhat obliquely to the main thrust of the Langlands philosophy, and there is no definitive statement currently known.

Sample consequence

It is no accident that

or equivalently,

is so close to an integer. This remarkable fact is explained by the theory of complex multiplication, together with some knowledge of modular forms, and the fact that

is a unique factorization domain.

Here satisfies α² = α − 41. In general, S[α] denotes the set of all polynomial expressions in α with coefficients in S, which is the smallest ring containing α and S. Because α satisfies this quadratic equation, the required polynomials can be limited to degree one.

Alternatively,[3]

an internal structure due to certain Eisenstein series, and with similar simple expressions for the other Heegner numbers.

Singular moduli

The points of the upper half-plane which correspond to the period ratios of curves over the complex numbers with complex multiplication are precisely the imaginary quadratic numbers.[4] These are the singular moduli, coming from an older terminology in which "singular" referred to the property of having non-trivial endomorphisms rather than referring to a singular curve.[5]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Reid, Constance (1996), Hilbert, Springer, p. 200, ISBN 978-0-387-94674-0
  2. ^ Silverman (1989) p.102
  3. ^ http://groups.google.com.ph/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/3d24137c9a860893?hl=en#
  4. ^ Silverman (1986) p.339
  5. ^ Silverman (1994) p.104

References