Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Lync Server: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Microsoft Lync Server. (TW) |
Comment |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Microsoft Lync Server}}) |
:({{Find sources|Microsoft Lync Server}}) |
||
Product does not appear independently notable, unable to find significant, in depth coverage in reliable sources to support GNG. [[User:Nouniquenames|<font color="red">No</font>]][[User Talk:Nouniquenames|<font color="green">unique</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nouniquenames|<font color="blue">names</font>]] 11:19, 12 December 2012 (UTC) |
Product does not appear independently notable, unable to find significant, in depth coverage in reliable sources to support GNG. [[User:Nouniquenames|<font color="red">No</font>]][[User Talk:Nouniquenames|<font color="green">unique</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Nouniquenames|<font color="blue">names</font>]] 11:19, 12 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''': Hello. Article does show evidence of coverage in secondary sources. I think the community must decide whether there is ''significant'' coverage in secondary reliable sources. Maybe one or two of us can perform [[WP:BEFORE]] and see if it should be deleted. Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 17:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:23, 14 December 2012
- Microsoft Lync Server (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Product does not appear independently notable, unable to find significant, in depth coverage in reliable sources to support GNG. Nouniquenames 11:19, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Hello. Article does show evidence of coverage in secondary sources. I think the community must decide whether there is significant coverage in secondary reliable sources. Maybe one or two of us can perform WP:BEFORE and see if it should be deleted. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)