Jump to content

Talk:Fels-Naptha: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Tagging with {{WikiProject Brands}} based on membership in Category:Dial Corporation brands per request Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/WikiProjectTagger
Line 2: Line 2:
Does the name come from Naphtha?
Does the name come from Naphtha?
:: Or [[feldspar]]? That's what I've sometimes suspected, although neither spelling is correct. [[User:Asat|Asat]] ([[User talk:Asat|talk]]) 02:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
:: Or [[feldspar]]? That's what I've sometimes suspected, although neither spelling is correct. [[User:Asat|Asat]] ([[User talk:Asat|talk]]) 02:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

== "Health Considerations" section seems relatively pointless ==

Of the two items it contains, one seems to be there only to state that it is no longer a health consideration, but used to be ("Outdated Health Considerations" section?) the other is referencing an MSDS... although the statement is accurate, it would make more sense if the section was titled "Health Considerations for Manufacturers". Just for fun, the MSDS for water http://www.flinnsci.com/Documents/MSDS/WXYZ/Water.pdf , with such gems as:

'''SECTION 4 — FIRST AID MEASURES'''
Call a physician and seek medical attention for further treatment, observation, and support after first aid.

and

'''SECTION 12 — ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION'''
Data not yet available.

MSDS data generally exists for the purpose of ''Oh Christ, a 400 ton container of Fels-Naptha just exploded all over the highway, what do I need to know about it right now so I don't make this situation worse''
and not
''Oh here is some laundry soap in bar form that behaves like every other soap I've used in my entire life'' which is what normal people are thinking about when they look up health considerations.

I was tempted to delete the section and fold relevant bits into others, but then I realized I could type at least twice as much on the Talk page first and avoid any possible hurt feelings or confusion on the part of all of those millions upon millions of people who rely on this article about a specific brand of bar soap for all of their needs (oh god, should I eat it, what should I do with it? what if I have one from 70 years ago lying around, is THAT one safe to eat?).

[[User:SlipperyDongDumpster|SlipperyDongDumpster]] ([[User talk:SlipperyDongDumpster|talk]]) 09:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:11, 21 August 2014

WikiProject iconBrands Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Does the name come from Naphtha?

Or feldspar? That's what I've sometimes suspected, although neither spelling is correct. Asat (talk) 02:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Health Considerations" section seems relatively pointless

Of the two items it contains, one seems to be there only to state that it is no longer a health consideration, but used to be ("Outdated Health Considerations" section?) the other is referencing an MSDS... although the statement is accurate, it would make more sense if the section was titled "Health Considerations for Manufacturers". Just for fun, the MSDS for water http://www.flinnsci.com/Documents/MSDS/WXYZ/Water.pdf , with such gems as:

SECTION 4 — FIRST AID MEASURES Call a physician and seek medical attention for further treatment, observation, and support after first aid.

and

SECTION 12 — ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION Data not yet available.

MSDS data generally exists for the purpose of Oh Christ, a 400 ton container of Fels-Naptha just exploded all over the highway, what do I need to know about it right now so I don't make this situation worse and not Oh here is some laundry soap in bar form that behaves like every other soap I've used in my entire life which is what normal people are thinking about when they look up health considerations.

I was tempted to delete the section and fold relevant bits into others, but then I realized I could type at least twice as much on the Talk page first and avoid any possible hurt feelings or confusion on the part of all of those millions upon millions of people who rely on this article about a specific brand of bar soap for all of their needs (oh god, should I eat it, what should I do with it? what if I have one from 70 years ago lying around, is THAT one safe to eat?).

SlipperyDongDumpster (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]