Jump to content

Nucleic acid double helix: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m →Helix geometries: The finding of zero linking number topoisomer is unable to be explained by the Watson-Crick Model. The fact refute the purely right-handed winding of the double helix.
Line 208: Line 208:
===Non-double helical forms===
===Non-double helical forms===
Alternate [[Non-helical models of DNA structure|non-helical models]] were briefly considered in the late 1970s as a potential solution to problems in the [[DNA replication|replication]] of DNA in [[plasmid]]s and [[chromatin]]. However, the models were set aside in favor of the double-helical model due to subsequent experimental advances such as [[X-ray crystallography]] of DNA duplexes and later the [[nucleosome core particle]], as well as the discovery of [[topoisomerases]], and these non-double-helical models are not currently accepted by the mainstream scientific community.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Stokes|first=T. D.|title=The double helix and the warped zipper—an exemplary tale|journal=Social Studies of Science|year=1982|volume=12|issue=2|pages=207–240|doi=10.1177/030631282012002002|accessdate=29 November 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Gautham|first=N.|title=Response to 'Variety in DNA secondary structure'|journal=Current Science|date=25 May 2004|volume=86|issue=10|pages=1352&ndash;1353|url=http://cs-test.ias.ac.in/cs/Downloads/article_37537.pdf|accessdate=25 May 2012|quote=However, the discovery of topoisomerases took "the sting" out of the topological objection to the plectonaemic double helix. The more recent solution of the single crystal X-ray structure of the nucleosome core particle showed nearly 150 base pairs of the DNA (i.e. about 15 complete turns), with a structure that is in all essential respects the same as the Watson–Crick model. This dealt a death blow to the idea that other forms of DNA, particularly double helical DNA, exist as anything other than local or transient structures.}}</ref>
Alternate [[Non-helical models of DNA structure|non-helical models]] were briefly considered in the late 1970s as a potential solution to problems in the [[DNA replication|replication]] of DNA in [[plasmid]]s and [[chromatin]]. However, the models were set aside in favor of the double-helical model due to subsequent experimental advances such as [[X-ray crystallography]] of DNA duplexes and later the [[nucleosome core particle]], as well as the discovery of [[topoisomerases]], and these non-double-helical models are not currently accepted by the mainstream scientific community.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Stokes|first=T. D.|title=The double helix and the warped zipper—an exemplary tale|journal=Social Studies of Science|year=1982|volume=12|issue=2|pages=207–240|doi=10.1177/030631282012002002|accessdate=29 November 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Gautham|first=N.|title=Response to 'Variety in DNA secondary structure'|journal=Current Science|date=25 May 2004|volume=86|issue=10|pages=1352&ndash;1353|url=http://cs-test.ias.ac.in/cs/Downloads/article_37537.pdf|accessdate=25 May 2012|quote=However, the discovery of topoisomerases took "the sting" out of the topological objection to the plectonaemic double helix. The more recent solution of the single crystal X-ray structure of the nucleosome core particle showed nearly 150 base pairs of the DNA (i.e. about 15 complete turns), with a structure that is in all essential respects the same as the Watson–Crick model. This dealt a death blow to the idea that other forms of DNA, particularly double helical DNA, exist as anything other than local or transient structures.}}</ref>
In 2009, an ambidextrous double helix DNA model was proposed by Xu based on his topological investigation (<ref>Xu YC, Finding of a zero linking number topoisomer. 2009. B.B.A. 1790, 126-133.</ref> <ref>Xu YC, Replication demands an amendment of the double helix.29—56 in, Ed. by H. Seligmann DNA Replication---recent advances, InTech. 2011</ref>), which reconcile the disparity of arguments between helix and non-helix model. Different from most of those SBS models, its main concept is that the two strands inside the double helix are winding ambidextrously, rather than plectonemically. Hence all the evidences favorable to the Watson - Crick Model are still valid. At the same time, it strongly insists that there is a lot of left-handed DNA co-existing with the right-handed DNA. It is likely that Z-DNA is only a member of the left-handed DNA. The main evidence comes from the finding of a zero linking number topoisomer, which is topologically impossible if the two strands of a covalently closed circular DNA are always winding in right-handed direction as claimed in the Watson-Crick Model. According to this bidirectional model, the discovery of topoisomerases becomes a favorable evidence to take "the sting" out of the topological objection from the classical double helix model. And the function of the slow reaction rate of gyrase (6 reactions per minute) in the replisome located at replication fork can get a reasonable explanation for the quick DNA replication rate (1kb per second or 6,000 bases per minute). Although the proposed amendment to the Watson-Crick Model is just change winding direction of two strands from the either/or to both/and, it may have great consequences in the understanding of DNA topology and the mechanism of DNA replication. This amendment actually is required by many established evidences of semi-conservative bi-directional DNA replication in E.coli and many other bacteria.
In 2009, an ambidextrous double helix DNA model was proposed by Xu based on his topological investigation (<ref>Xu YC, Finding of a zero linking number topoisomer. 2009. B.B.A. 1790, 126-133.</ref> <ref>Xu YC, Replication demands an amendment of the double helix.29—56 in, Ed. by H. Seligmann DNA Replication---recent advances, InTech. 2011</ref>), which reconcile the disparity of arguments between helix and non-helix model. Different from most of those SBS models, its main concept is that the two strands inside the double helix are winding ambidextrously, rather than plectonemically. Hence all the evidences favorable to the Watson - Crick Model are still valid. At the same time, it strongly insists that there is a lot of left-handed DNA co-existing with the right-handed DNA. It is likely that Z-DNA is only a member of the left-handed DNA family. The main evidence comes from the finding of a zero linking number topoisomer, which is topologically impossible if the two strands of a covalently closed circular DNA are always winding in right-handed direction as claimed in the Watson-Crick Model. According to this bidirectional model, the discovery of topoisomerases becomes a favorable evidence to take "the sting" out of the topological objection from the classical double helix model. And the function of the slow reaction rate of gyrase (6 reactions per minute) in the replisome located at replication fork can get a reasonable explanation for the quick DNA replication rate (1kb per second or 60,000 bases per minute). Although the proposed amendment to the Watson-Crick Model is just change winding direction of two strands from the either/or to both/and, it may have great consequences in the understanding of DNA topology and the mechanism of DNA replication. This amendment actually is required by many established evidences of semi-conservative bi-directional DNA replication in E.coli and many other bacteria.


[[ssDNA|Single-stranded nucleic acids]] do not adopt a helical formation, and are described by models such as the [[random coil]] or [[worm-like chain]].{{Citation needed|date=January 2013}}
[[ssDNA|Single-stranded nucleic acids]] do not adopt a helical formation, and are described by models such as the [[random coil]] or [[worm-like chain]].{{Citation needed|date=January 2013}}

Revision as of 15:12, 30 March 2013

"Double helix" redirects here. For other uses, see Double helix (disambiguation).
Two complementary regions of nucleic acid molecules will bind and form a double helical structure held together by base pairs.

In molecular biology, the term double helix[1] refers to the structure formed by double-stranded molecules of nucleic acids such as DNA and RNA. The double helical structure of a nucleic acid complex arises as a consequence of its secondary structure, and is a fundamental component in determining its tertiary structure. The term entered popular culture with the publication in 1968 of The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA, by James Watson.

The DNA double helix polymer of nucleic acids, held together by nucleotides which base pair together.[2] In B-DNA, the most common double helical structure, the double helix is right-handed with about 10–10.5 nucleotides per turn.[3] The double helix structure of DNA contains a major groove and minor groove, the major groove being wider than the minor groove.[2] Given the difference in widths of the major groove and minor groove, many proteins which bind to DNA do so through the wider major groove.[4]

History

Further information: History of molecular biology

The double-helix model of DNA structure was first published in the journal Nature by James D. Watson and Francis Crick in 1953,[5] (X,Y,Z coordinates in 1954[6]) based upon the crucial X-ray diffraction image of DNA labeled as "Photo 51", from Rosalind Franklin in 1952,[7] followed by her more clarified DNA image with Raymond Gosling,[8][9] Maurice Wilkins, Alexander Stokes, and Herbert Wilson,[10] as well as base-pairing chemical and biochemical information by Erwin Chargaff.[11][12][13][14][15][16] The previous model was triple-stranded DNA.[17]

The realization that the structure of DNA is that of a double-helix elucidated the mechanism of base pairing by which genetic information is stored and copied in living organisms is widely considered one of the most important scientific discoveries of the 20th century. Crick, Wilkins, and Watson each received one third of the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their contributions to the discovery.[18] (Franklin, whose breakthrough X-ray diffraction data was used to formulate the DNA structure, died in 1958, and thus was ineligible to be nominated for a Nobel Prize.)

Nucleic acid hybridization

Main article: Nucleic acid thermodynamics

Hybridization is the process of complementary base pairs binding to form a double helix. Melting is the process by which the interactions between the strands of the double helix are broken, separating the two nucleic acid strands. These bonds are weak, easily separated by gentle heating, enzymes, or physical force. Melting occurs preferentially at certain points in the nucleic acid.[19] T and A rich sequences are more easily melted than C and G rich regions. Particular base steps are also susceptible to DNA melting, particularly T A and T G base steps.[20] These mechanical features are reflected by the use of sequences such as TATA at the start of many genes to assist RNA polymerase in melting the DNA for transcription.

Strand separation by gentle heating, as used in PCR, is simple providing the molecules have fewer than about 10,000 base pairs (10 kilobase pairs, or 10 kbp). The intertwining of the DNA strands makes long segments difficult to separate. The cell avoids this problem by allowing its DNA-melting enzymes (helicases) to work concurrently with topoisomerases, which can chemically cleave the phosphate backbone of one of the strands so that it can swivel around the other. Helicases unwind the strands to facilitate the advance of sequence-reading enzymes such as DNA polymerase.

Base pair geometry

The geometry of a base, or base pair step can be characterized by 6 coordinates: Shift, slide, rise, tilt, roll, and twist. These values precisely define the location and orientation in space of every base or base pair in a nucleic acid molecule relative to its predecessor along the axis of the helix. Together, they characterize the helical structure of the molecule. In regions of DNA or RNA where the "normal" structure is disrupted, the change in these values can be used to describe such disruption.

For each base pair, considered relative to its predecessor, there are the following base pair geometries to consider:[21][22][23]

  • Shear
  • Stretch
  • Stagger
  • Buckle
  • Propeller twist: rotation of one base with respect to the other in the same base pair.
  • Opening
  • Shift: displacement along an axis in the base-pair plane perpendicular to the first, directed from the minor to the major groove.
  • Slide: displacement along an axis in the plane of the base pair directed from one strand to the other.
  • Rise: displacement along the helix axis.
  • Tilt: rotation around this axis.
  • vRoll: rotation around this axis.
  • Twist: rotation around the helix axis.
  • vx-displacement
  • y-displacement
  • inclination
  • tip
  • pitch: the number of base pairs per complete turn of the helix.

Rise and twist determine the handedness and pitch of the helix. The other coordinates, by contrast, can be zero. Slide and shift are typically small in B-DNA, but are substantial in A- and Z-DNA. Roll and tilt make successive base pairs less parallel, and are typically small. A diagram of these coordinates can be found in 3DNA website.

Note that "tilt" has often been used differently in the scientific literature, referring to the deviation of the first, inter-strand base-pair axis from perpendicularity to the helix axis. This corresponds to slide between a succession of base pairs, and in helix-based coordinates is properly termed "inclination".

Helix geometries

At least three DNA conformations are believed to be found in nature, A-DNA, B-DNA, and Z-DNA. The "B" form described by James D. Watson and Francis Crick is believed to predominate in cells.[24] It is 23.7 Å wide and extends 34 Å per 10 bp of sequence. The double helix makes one complete turn about its axis every 10.4-10.5 base pairs in solution. This frequency of twist (known as the helical pitch) depends largely on stacking forces that each base exerts on its neighbours in the chain.

A-DNA and Z-DNA differ significantly in their geometry and dimensions to B-DNA, although still form helical structures. The A form appears likely to occur only in dehydrated samples of DNA, such as those used in crystallographic experiments, and possibly in hybrid pairings of DNA and RNA strands. Segments of DNA that cells have been methylated for regulatory purposes may adopt the Z geometry, in which the strands turn about the helical axis the opposite way to A-DNA and B-DNA. There is also evidence of protein-DNA complexes forming Z-DNA structures.

Other conformations are possible; A-DNA, B-DNA, C-DNA, E-DNA,[25] L-DNA (the enantiomeric form of D-DNA),[26] P-DNA,[27] S-DNA, Z-DNA, etc. have been described so far.[28] In fact, only the letters F, Q, U, V, and Y are now available to describe any new DNA structure that may appear in the future.[29][30] However, most of these forms have been created synthetically and have not been observed in naturally occurring biological systems.[citation needed] There are also triple-stranded DNA forms and quadruplex forms such as the G-quadruplex.

The structures of A-, B-, and Z-DNA.
The helix axis of A-, B-, and Z-DNA.
Structural features of the three major forms of DNA
Geometry attribute A-DNA B-DNA Z-DNA
Helix sense right-handed right-handed left-handed
Repeating unit 1 bp 1 bp 2 bp
Rotation/bp 32.7° 35.9° 60°/2
bp/turn 11 10.5 12
Inclination of bp to axis +19° −1.2° −9°
Rise/bp along axis 2.3 Å (0.23 nm) 3.32 Å (0.332 nm) 3.8 Å (0.38 nm)
Pitch/turn of helix 28.2 Å (2.82 nm) 33.2 Å (3.32 nm) 45.6 Å (4.56 nm)
Mean propeller twist +18° +16° 0°
Glycosyl angle anti anti C: anti,
G: syn
Sugar pucker C3'-endo C2'-endo C: C2'-endo,
G: C2'-exo
Diameter 23 Å (2.3 nm) 20 Å (2.0 nm) 18 Å (1.8 nm)
Sources:[31][32][33]

Grooves

Major and minor grooves of DNA. Minor groove is a binding site for the dye Hoechst 33258.

Twin helical strands form the DNA backbone. Another double helix may be found by tracing the spaces, or grooves, between the strands. These voids are adjacent to the base pairs and may provide a binding site. As the strands are not directly opposite each other, the grooves are unequally sized. One groove, the major groove, is 22 Å wide and the other, the minor groove, is 12 Å wide.[34] The narrowness of the minor groove means that the edges of the bases are more accessible in the major groove. As a result, proteins like transcription factors that can bind to specific sequences in double-stranded DNA usually make contacts to the sides of the bases exposed in the major groove.[4] This situation varies in unusual conformations of DNA within the cell (see below), but the major and minor grooves are always named to reflect the differences in size that would be seen if the DNA is twisted back into the ordinary B form.

Non-double helical forms

Alternate non-helical models were briefly considered in the late 1970s as a potential solution to problems in the replication of DNA in plasmids and chromatin. However, the models were set aside in favor of the double-helical model due to subsequent experimental advances such as X-ray crystallography of DNA duplexes and later the nucleosome core particle, as well as the discovery of topoisomerases, and these non-double-helical models are not currently accepted by the mainstream scientific community.[35][36] In 2009, an ambidextrous double helix DNA model was proposed by Xu based on his topological investigation ([37] [38]), which reconcile the disparity of arguments between helix and non-helix model. Different from most of those SBS models, its main concept is that the two strands inside the double helix are winding ambidextrously, rather than plectonemically. Hence all the evidences favorable to the Watson - Crick Model are still valid. At the same time, it strongly insists that there is a lot of left-handed DNA co-existing with the right-handed DNA. It is likely that Z-DNA is only a member of the left-handed DNA family. The main evidence comes from the finding of a zero linking number topoisomer, which is topologically impossible if the two strands of a covalently closed circular DNA are always winding in right-handed direction as claimed in the Watson-Crick Model. According to this bidirectional model, the discovery of topoisomerases becomes a favorable evidence to take "the sting" out of the topological objection from the classical double helix model. And the function of the slow reaction rate of gyrase (6 reactions per minute) in the replisome located at replication fork can get a reasonable explanation for the quick DNA replication rate (1kb per second or 60,000 bases per minute). Although the proposed amendment to the Watson-Crick Model is just change winding direction of two strands from the either/or to both/and, it may have great consequences in the understanding of DNA topology and the mechanism of DNA replication. This amendment actually is required by many established evidences of semi-conservative bi-directional DNA replication in E.coli and many other bacteria.

Single-stranded nucleic acids do not adopt a helical formation, and are described by models such as the random coil or worm-like chain.[citation needed]

Bending

DNA is a relatively rigid polymer, typically modelled as a worm-like chain. It has three significant degrees of freedom; bending, twisting and compression, each of which cause particular limitations on what is possible with DNA within a cell. Twisting/torsional stiffness is important for the circularisation of DNA and the orientation of DNA bound proteins relative to each other and bending/axial stiffness is important for DNA wrapping and circularisation and protein interactions. Compression/extension is relatively unimportant in the absence of high tension.

Persistence length/axial stiffness

Example sequences and their persistence lengths (B DNA)[citation needed]
Sequence Persistence Length
/base pairs
Random 154±10
(CA)repeat 133±10
(CAG)repeat 124±10
(TATA)repeat 137±10
Main article: Persistence length

DNA in solution does not take a rigid structure but is continually changing conformation due to thermal vibration and collisions with water molecules, which makes classical measures of rigidity impossible. Hence, the bending stiffness of DNA is measured by the persistence length, defined as:

"The length of DNA over which the time-averaged orientation of the polymer becomes uncorrelated by a factor of e".

This value may be directly measured using an atomic force microscope to directly image DNA molecules of various lengths. In an aqueous solution, the average persistence length is 46-50 nm or 140-150 base pairs (the diameter of DNA is 2 nm), although can vary significantly. This makes DNA a moderately stiff molecule.

The persistence length of a section of DNA is somewhat dependent on its sequence, and this can cause significant variation. The variation is largely due to base stacking energies and the residues which extend into the minor and major grooves.

Models for DNA bending

Stacking stability of base steps (B DNA)[39]
Step Stacking ΔG
/kcal mol−1
T A -0.19
T G or C A -0.55
C G -0.91
A G or C T -1.06
A A or T T -1.11
A T -1.34
G A or T C -1.43
C C or G G -1.44
A C or G T -1.81
G C -2.17

The entropic flexibility of DNA is remarkably consistent with standard polymer physics models, such as the Kratky-Porod worm-like chain model.[citation needed] Consistent with the worm-like chain model is the observation that bending DNA is also described by Hooke's law at very small (sub-piconewton) forces. However, for DNA segments less than the persistence length, the bending force is approximately constant and behaviour deviates from the worm-like chain predictions.

This effect results in unusual ease in circularising small DNA molecules and a higher probability of finding highly bent sections of DNA.[citation needed]

Bending preference

DNA molecules often have a preferred direction to bend, i.e. anisotropic bending. This is, again, due to the properties of the bases which make up the DNA sequence - a random sequence will have no preferred bend direction, i.e. isotropic bending.

Preferred DNA bend direction is determined by the stability of stacking each base on top of the next. If unstable base stacking steps are always found on one side of the DNA helix then the DNA will preferentially bend away from that direction. As bend angle increases then steric hindrances and ability to roll the residues relative to each other also play a role, especially in the minor groove. A and T residues will be preferentially be found in the minor grooves on the inside of bends. This effect is particularly seen in DNA-protein binding where tight DNA bending is induced, such as in nucleosome particles. See base step distortions above.

DNA molecules with exceptional bending preference can become intrinsically bent. This was first observed in trypanosomatid kinetoplast DNA. Typical sequences which cause this contain stretches of 4-6 T and A residues separated by G and C rich sections which keep the A and T residues in phase with the minor groove on one side of the molecule. For example: 

 |                  |                  |                  |                  |                  |
G A T T C C C A A A A A T G T C A A A A A A T A G G C A A A A A A T G C C A A A A A A T C C C A A A C

The intrinsically bent structure is induced by the 'propeller twist' of base pairs relative to each other allowing unusual bifurcated Hydrogen-bonds between base steps. At higher temperatures this structure, and so the intrinsic bend, is lost.

All DNA which bends anisotropically has, on average, a longer persistence length and greater axial stiffness. This increased rigidity is required to prevent random bending which would make the molecule act isotropically.

Circularization

DNA circularization depends on both the axial (bending) stiffness and torsional (rotational) stiffness of the molecule. For a DNA molecule to successfully circularize it must be long enough to easily bend into the full circle and must have the correct number of bases so the ends are in the correct rotation to allow bonding to occur. The optimum length for circularization of DNA is around 400 base pairs (136 nm), with an integral number of turns of the DNA helix, i.e. multiples of 10.4 base pairs. Having a non integral number of turns presents a significant energy barrier for circularization, for example a 10.4 x 30 = 312 base pair molecule will circularize hundreds of times faster than 10.4 x 30.5 ≈ 317 base pair molecule.

Stretching

Longer stretches of DNA are entropically elastic under tension. When DNA is in solution, it undergoes continuous structural variations due to the energy available in the thermal bath of the solvent. This is due to the thermal vibration of the molecule combined with continual collisions with water molecules. For entropic reasons, more compact relaxed states are thermally accessible than stretched out states, and so DNA molecules are almost universally found in a tangled relaxed layouts. For this reason, a single molecule of DNA will stretch under a force, straightening it out. Using optical tweezers, the entropic stretching behavior of DNA has been studied and analyzed from a polymer physics perspective, and it has been found that DNA behaves largely like the Kratky-Porod worm-like chain model under physiologically accessible energy scales.

Under sufficient tension and positive torque, DNA is thought to undergo a phase transition with the bases splaying outwards and the phosphates moving to the middle. This proposed structure for overstretched DNA has been called "P-form DNA", in honor of Linus Pauling who originally presented it as a possible structure of DNA.[27]

The mechanical properties DNA under compression have not been characterized due to experimental difficulties in preventing the polymer from bending under the compressive force.[citation needed]

Supercoiling and topology

Main article: DNA supercoil
Supercoiled structure of circular DNA molecules with low writhe. Note that the helical nature of the DNA duplex is omitted for clarity.

The B form of the DNA helix twists 360° per 10.4-10.5 bp in the absence of torsional strain. But many molecular biological processes can induce torsional strain. A DNA segment with excess or insufficient helical twisting is referred to, respectively, as positively or negatively "supercoiled". DNA in vivo is typically negatively supercoiled, which facilitates the unwinding (melting) of the double-helix required for RNA transcription.

Within the cell most DNA is topologically restricted. DNA is typically found in closed loops (such as plasmids in prokaryotes) which are topologically closed, or as very long molecules whose diffusion coefficients produce effectively topologically closed domains. Linear sections of DNA are also commonly bound to proteins or physical structures (such as membranes) to form closed topological loops.

Francis Crick was one of the first to propose the importance of linking numbers when considering DNA supercoils. In a paper published in 1976, Crick outlined the problem as follows:

In considering supercoils formed by closed double-stranded molecules of DNA certain mathematical concepts, such as the linking number and the twist, are needed. The meaning of these for a closed ribbon is explained and also that of the writhing number of a closed curve. Some simple examples are given, some of which may be relevant to the structure of chromatin.[40]

Analysis of DNA topology uses three values:

L = linking number - the number of times one DNA strand wraps around the other. It is an integer for a closed loop and constant for a closed topological domain.
T = twist - total number of turns in the double stranded DNA helix. This will normally tend to approach the number of turns that a topologically open double stranded DNA helix makes free in solution: number of bases/10.5, assuming there are no intercalating agents (e.g., chloroquine) or other elements modifying the stiffness of the DNA.
W = writhe - number of turns of the double stranded DNA helix around the superhelical axis
L = T + W and ΔL = ΔT + ΔW

Any change of T in a closed topological domain must be balanced by a change in W, and vice versa. This results in higher order structure of DNA. A circular DNA molecule with a writhe of 0 will be circular. If the twist of this molecule is subsequently increased or decreased by supercoiling then the writhe will be appropriately altered, making the molecule undergo plectonemic or toroidal superhelical coiling.

When the ends of a piece of double stranded helical DNA are joined so that it forms a circle the strands are topologically knotted. This means the single strands cannot be separated any process that does not involve breaking a strand (such as heating). The task of un-knotting topologically linked strands of DNA falls to enzymes known as topoisomerases. These enzymes are dedicated to un-knotting circular DNA by cleaving one or both strands so that another double or single stranded segment can pass through. This un-knotting is required for the replication of circular DNA and various types of recombination in linear DNA which have similar topological constraints.

The linking number paradox

For many years, the origin of residual supercoiling in eukaryotic genomes remained unclear. This topological puzzle was referred to by some as the "linking number paradox".[41] However, when experimentally determined structures of the nucleosome displayed an over-twisted left-handed wrap of DNA around the histone octamer,[42][43] this "paradox" was considered to be solved by the scientific community.

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to DNA helix-structures.

References

  1. ^ Kabai, Sándor (2007). "Double Helix". The Wolfram Demonstrations Project.
  2. ^ a b Alberts; et al. (1994). The Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland Science. ISBN 978-0-8153-4105-5. {{cite book}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  3. ^ Wang JC (1979). "Helical repeat of DNA in solution". PNAS. 76 (1): 200–203. Bibcode:1979PNAS...76..200W. doi:10.1073/pnas.76.1.200. PMC 382905. PMID 284332.
  4. ^ a b Pabo C, Sauer R (1984). "Protein-DNA recognition". Annu Rev Biochem. 53: 293–321. doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.001453. PMID 6236744.
  5. ^ James D. Watson and Francis Crick (1953). "A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid" (PDF). Nature. 171 (4356): 737–738. Bibcode:1953Natur.171..737W. doi:10.1038/171737a0. PMID 13054692.
  6. ^ Crick F, Watson JD (1954). "The Complementary Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 223, Series A: 80–96.
  7. ^ "Secret of Photo 51". NOVA. PBS.
  8. ^ http://www.nature.com/nature/dna50/franklingosling.pdf
  9. ^ The Structure of the DNA Molecule
  10. ^ Wilkins MHF, Stokes AR, Wilson HR (1953). "Molecular Structure of Deoxypentose Nucleic Acids" (PDF). Nature. 171 (4356): 738–740. Bibcode:1953Natur.171..738W. doi:10.1038/171738a0. PMID 13054693.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ Elson D, Chargaff E (1952). "On the deoxyribonucleic acid content of sea urchin gametes". Experientia. 8 (4): 143–145. doi:10.1007/BF02170221. PMID 14945441.
  12. ^ Chargaff E, Lipshitz R, Green C (1952). "Composition of the deoxypentose nucleic acids of four genera of sea-urchin". J Biol Chem. 195 (1): 155–160. PMID 14938364.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ Chargaff E, Lipshitz R, Green C, Hodes ME (1951). "The composition of the deoxyribonucleic acid of salmon sperm". J Biol Chem. 192 (1): 223–230. PMID 14917668.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ Chargaff E (1951). "Some recent studies on the composition and structure of nucleic acids". J Cell Physiol Suppl. 38 (Suppl).
  15. ^ Magasanik B, Vischer E, Doniger R, Elson D, Chargaff E (1950). "The separation and estimation of ribonucleotides in minute quantities". J Biol Chem. 186 (1): 37–50. PMID 14778802.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ^ Chargaff E (1950). "Chemical specificity of nucleic acids and mechanism of their enzymatic degradation". Experientia. 6 (6): 201–209. doi:10.1007/BF02173653. PMID 15421335.
  17. ^ Pauling L, Corey RB (1953 Feb). "A proposed structure for the nucleic acids". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 39 (2): 84–97. Bibcode:1953PNAS...39...84P. doi:10.1073/pnas.39.2.84. PMC 1063734. PMID 16578429. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  18. ^ "Nobel Prize - List of All Nobel Laureates".
  19. ^ Breslauer KJ, Frank R, Blöcker H, Marky LA (1986). "Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence". PNAS. 83 (11): 3746–3750. Bibcode:1986PNAS...83.3746B. doi:10.1073/pnas.83.11.3746. PMC 323600. PMID 3459152.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ Owczarzy, Richard (2008-08-28). "DNA melting temperature - How to calculate it?". High-throughput DNA biophysics. owczarzy.net. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
  21. ^ Dickerson RE (1989). "Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure components". Nucleic Acids Res. 17 (5): 1797–1803. doi:10.1093/nar/17.5.1797. PMC 317523. PMID 2928107.
  22. ^ Lu XJ, Olson WK (1999). "Resolving the discrepancies among nucleic acid conformational analyses". J Mol Biol. 285 (4): 1563–1575. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2390. PMID 9917397.
  23. ^ Olson WK, Bansal M, Burley SK, Dickerson RE, Gerstein M, Harvey SC, Heinemann U, Lu XJ, Neidle S, Shakked Z, Sklenar H, Suzuki M, Tung CS, Westhof E, Wolberger C, Berman HM (2001). "A standard reference frame for the description of nucleic acid base-pair geometry". J Mol Biol. 313 (1): 229–237. doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4987. PMID 11601858.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. ^ Richmond; Davey, CA; et al. (2003). "The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core". Nature. 423 (6936): 145–150. Bibcode:2003Natur.423..145R. doi:10.1038/nature01595. PMID 12736678. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  25. ^ Vargason JM, Eichman BF, Ho PS (2000). "The extended and eccentric E-DNA structure induced by cytosine methylation or bromination". Nature Structural Biology. 7 (9): 758–761. doi:10.1038/78985. PMID 10966645.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. ^ Hayashi G, Hagihara M, Nakatani K (2005). "Application of L-DNA as a molecular tag". Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (Oxf). 49 (49): 261–262. doi:10.1093/nass/49.1.261. PMID 17150733.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ a b Allemand JF, Bensimon D, Lavery R, Croquette V (1998). "Stretched and overwound DNA forms a Pauling-like structure with exposed bases". PNAS. 95 (24): 14152–14157. Bibcode:1998PNAS...9514152A. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14152. PMC 24342. PMID 9826669.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ^ List of 55 fiber structures
  29. ^ Bansal M (2003). "DNA structure: Revisiting the Watson-Crick double helix". Current Science. 85 (11): 1556–1563.
  30. ^ Ghosh A, Bansal M (2003). "A glossary of DNA structures from A to Z". Acta Cryst. D59 (Pt 4): 620–626. doi:10.1107/S0907444903003251. PMID 12657780.
  31. ^ Sinden, Richard R (1994-01-15). DNA structure and function (1st ed.). Academic Press. p. 398. ISBN 0-12-645750-6.
  32. ^ Rich A, Norheim A, Wang AHJ (1984). "The chemistry and biology of left-handed Z-DNA". Annual Review of Biochemistry. 53: 791–846. doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.004043. PMID 6383204.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  33. ^ Ho PS (1994-09-27). "The non-B-DNA structure of d(CA/TG)n does not differ from that of Z-DNA". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91 (20): 9549–9553. Bibcode:1994PNAS...91.9549H. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.20.9549. PMC 44850. PMID 7937803.
  34. ^ Wing R, Drew H, Takano T, Broka C, Tanaka S, Itakura K, Dickerson R (1980). "Crystal structure analysis of a complete turn of B-DNA". Nature. 287 (5784): 755–8. Bibcode:1980Natur.287..755W. doi:10.1038/287755a0. PMID 7432492.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  35. ^ Stokes, T. D. (1982). "The double helix and the warped zipper—an exemplary tale". Social Studies of Science. 12 (2): 207–240. doi:10.1177/030631282012002002. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  36. ^ Gautham, N. (25 May 2004). "Response to 'Variety in DNA secondary structure'" (PDF). Current Science. 86 (10): 1352–1353. Retrieved 25 May 2012. However, the discovery of topoisomerases took "the sting" out of the topological objection to the plectonaemic double helix. The more recent solution of the single crystal X-ray structure of the nucleosome core particle showed nearly 150 base pairs of the DNA (i.e. about 15 complete turns), with a structure that is in all essential respects the same as the Watson–Crick model. This dealt a death blow to the idea that other forms of DNA, particularly double helical DNA, exist as anything other than local or transient structures.
  37. ^ Xu YC, Finding of a zero linking number topoisomer. 2009. B.B.A. 1790, 126-133.
  38. ^ Xu YC, Replication demands an amendment of the double helix.29—56 in, Ed. by H. Seligmann DNA Replication---recent advances, InTech. 2011
  39. ^ Protozanova E, Yakovchuk P, Frank-Kamenetskii MD (2004). "Stacked–Unstacked Equilibrium at the Nick Site of DNA". J Mol Biol. 342 (3): 775–785. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.075. PMID 15342236.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  40. ^ Crick FH (1976). "Linking numbers and nucleosomes". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 73 (8): 2639–43. Bibcode:1976PNAS...73.2639C. doi:10.1073/pnas.73.8.2639. PMC 430703. PMID 1066673.
  41. ^ Prunell A (1998). "A topological approach to nucleosome structure and dynamics: the linking number paradox and other issues". Biophys J. 74 (5): 2531–2544. Bibcode:1998BpJ....74.2531P. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77961-5. PMC 1299595. PMID 9591679.
  42. ^ Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ (1997). "Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution". Nature. 389 (6648): 251–260. Bibcode:1997Natur.389..251L. doi:10.1038/38444. PMID 9305837.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  43. ^ Davey CA, Sargent DF, Luger K, Maeder AW, Richmond TJ (2002). "Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 Å resolution". Journal of Molecular Biology. 319 (5): 1097–1113. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00386-8. PMID 12079350.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nucleic_acid_double_helix&oldid=547824707"